Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes liberals marriage is most fitting between opposite sexes and it always will be no matter how much you try to
Pervert the tradition of marriage. Marriage between the same sexes has never been or will never be normal no matter how much you try to pervert society to accept it. And I’m sure “God” would agree!
You are right on the home seller example but when you conduct a business call doesn't the impression the other party gets mean the same thing? You can be representing yourself and that fine but if the recipient doesn't take it the same way they may look elsewhere. Simple example might be overt or excessive faith symbols and based on the usual negative comments on these boards same gender wedding pictures.
No one dictating you do anything this is just another concept of modern business and there are those who think its relevant.
Is the example in the article your idea of offensive? The article does not present it in the way you are attempting to twist it, by saying it would be better for the business. It's telling people they are offending others by having wedding photos and thereby attempting to force correctness. That is social engineering by shame.
Status:
"Let this year be over..."
(set 25 days ago)
Location: Where my bills arrive
19,223 posts, read 17,105,490 times
Reputation: 15540
Quote:
Originally Posted by redwood66
Is the example in the article your idea of offensive? The article does not present it in the way you are attempting to twist it, by saying it would be better for the business. It's telling people they are offending others by having wedding photos and thereby attempting to force correctness. That is social engineering by shame.
Lets stop here, I haven't changed anything, I have neither said I agree or disagree I have only said
"the only thing that makes sense is realize what people are seeing if your involved with an online meeting.".
You are welcome to twist this into whatever you want because at this point you are on your own tangent with it. Love it, hate it, protest it I really don't care....
You are right on the home seller example but when you conduct a business call doesn't the impression the other party gets mean the same thing? You can be representing yourself and that fine but if the recipient doesn't take it the same way they may look elsewhere. Simple example might be overt or excessive faith symbols and based on the usual negative comments on these boards same gender wedding pictures.
No one dictating you do anything this is just another concept of modern business and there are those who think its relevant.
But the study didn't address same sex wedding photo's did it? They're not saying the notion of same sex marriage might be offensive to some, which could cost someone business, so be aware of what people are seeing on zoom.
They're saying heterosexual wedding photo's is pushing a bias and potentially alienating and harming people who aren't heterosexual, which is utter bull crap.
It's a study being done by social scientists. Big whoop. Nobody is forcing you to take your wedding picture off the wall if you're doing a Skype meeting.
Social “scientists” LOL I guess the science is settled!
More virtue signaling from the academic wing of Beads and Sandals Inc.
Lets stop here, I haven't changed anything, I have neither said I agree or disagree I have only said
"the only thing that makes sense is realize what people are seeing if your involved with an online meeting.".
You are welcome to twist this into whatever you want because at this point you are on your own tangent with it. Love it, hate it, protest it I really don't care....
I am not twisting anything said by the articles, you are. It isn't presented as some innocuous "realize what people are seeing if your (you're) involved with an online meeting" like you try to twist it into. It is very specific in identifying its offended minority subjects with microaggressions - very tiny perceived aggressions.
Status:
"Let this year be over..."
(set 25 days ago)
Location: Where my bills arrive
19,223 posts, read 17,105,490 times
Reputation: 15540
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan
Which anyone and everyone is welcome to ignore if they like. <shrug>
Lots of triggered folks in this thread, though.
Kool-Aid for everyone......
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
