Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Before they force anyone wears a mask (bacteria trap) don't you think they show studies on whether or not it impacts people's health for hours of use. If it is working so well then your essentially collecting bacteria right next to your mouth and nose, but no big deal.
Your health is not important, you are responsible for the health of someone next to you who wants/needs to go out.
The first article is about a study that has serious limitations in its methodology, which are likely the reason no one wants to publish it, not a conspiracy to suppress the results.
The second article ignores the fact that current increases in the number of cases is being ascribed to lack of mask use in private gatherings, not public.
The first article is about a study that has serious limitations in its methodology, which are likely the reason no one wants to publish it, not a conspiracy to suppress the results.
The second article ignores the fact that current increases in the number of cases is being ascribed to lack of mask use in private gatherings, not public.
Fact? What FACT! And you can proved this how? It's like saying that smelling cigar smoke can make one fat. That's the problem, too much BS and conflicting information amounting to nothing. It gives more reasons to keep the power hungry to keep kicking this rusty can of a pandemic down the road.
During the 1969 (H3N2) Hon Kong Flu Pandemic, 1 to 4 million died. There was Woodstock going on and a man set foot on the moon. There was no stupid masks or lockdowns.
The first article is about a study that has serious limitations in its methodology, which are likely the reason no one wants to publish it, not a conspiracy to suppress the results.
The second article ignores the fact that current increases in the number of cases is being ascribed to lack of mask use in private gatherings, not public.
The main point is was did the study not show what the current narrative is (that masks are so great) and so they refused to publish it. The results may have not been what the expect. So if the study comes out in a few months somehow saying masks work, does it have any credibility now.
Masks are working so well that Trader Joes and Amazon have thousands of people getting infected. Sure lets continue this joke giving people a false sense their mask can save them from a virus...or save others.
Then don't bitterly complain if you get sick from the virus. Interesting how seldom I read of people complaining they wore a mask where ever there was people, but got sick from the virus anyway.
Just stop already with the overflowing hospital scare-mongering. IT NEVER HAPPENED despite assurances that it would!
It has — not in every city or town—but in some
And if CoVid continues to infect people then some of those people are going to the hospital and need intubation and ICU beds
You can’t ignore reality just because it doesn’t suit your agenda
Masks are working so well that Trader Joes and Amazon have thousands of people getting infected. Sure lets continue this joke giving people a false sense their mask can save them from a virus...or save others.
Some masks ARE crap
Some are not
Just like some better quality
And some people don’t wear masks properly
Don’t follow through with other aspects of CoVid security
A flu shot might not protect every person who gets one
But you are better getting the shot than not IMO
He can order anything he like, who will follow this order?
Last edited by looker009; 11-09-2020 at 11:03 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.