Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We don't know that. The Delta spreads among the vaccinated, so it might just do what it does regardless of how fast we vaccinated. There is this mythical idea that we could have vaccinated 'fast enough' to outrun the coronavirus. This idea has no basis in anything. We can't even quantify what 'fast enough' means, or if it was even feasible.
What I said was never possible to do in real life.
The point is that the smaller the active viral pool, the less chance of more virulent viral mutations occurring.
The CDC showed around 12,000 reported deaths via VAERS for about a week and then later, showed around 6,000 reported VAERS deaths. They deleted about half of the reports.
I suspect you have not been playing very close attention.
Those other 6000 were not in the US and were entered by mistake.
Is that what you call "addressed"? First, consider the source (politifact), then consider THEIR source (CDC.)
A clerical error...
There have already been screenshots of records that were gone the next day. They were NOT foreign. And the CDC better be glad they weren't foreign, as the numbers would have been triple the 12,000.
Is that what you call "addressed"? First, consider the source (politifact), then consider THEIR source (CDC.)
A clerical error...
There have already been screenshots of records that were gone the next day. They were NOT foreign. And the CDC better be glad they weren't foreign, as the numbers would have been triple the 12,000.
Oh I'd love to see all the screenshots of the 6,000 records that "weren't foreign." I don't believe you.
Despite his claims, Malone did not invent the mRNA vaccine nor it’s platform.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur
Malone is a self promoter and liar. It is Dr. Katalin Karikó and her collaborator Dr. Drew Weissman who are more commonly credited with laying the groundwork for mRNA vaccines.
What he has said is that he is the inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology.
Due to their unique physicochemical properties, graphene-family nanomaterials (GFNs) are widely used in many fields, especially in biomedical applications.
Due to their exceptional physical and chemical properties, graphene materials have been widely used in various fields, including energy storage; nanoelectronic devices; batteries [10–12]; and biomedical applications, such as antibacterials [13, 14], biosensors [15–18], cell imaging [19, 20], drug delivery [8, 21, 22], and tissue engineering [23–25].
GFNs penetrate through the physiological barriers or cellular structures by different exposure ways or administration routes and entry the body or cells, eventually resulting in toxicity in vivo and in vitro.
GO can result in acute inflammation response and chronic injury by interfering with the normal physiological functions of important organs [32, 81].
Graphene has largely benefited neurosurgery with the application of drug/gene delivery (hmmm.. MRN vaccine?) for brain tumour treatment, intracranial and spinal biocompatible devices, biosensing and bioimaging techniques. Studies regarding the potentialities or risks of graphene in the brain have emerged.
Pristine graphene reduced the vascularization of the heart and the density of branched vessels after injection into fertilized chicken eggs followed by incubation for 19 d [101]
"We hypothesised that graphene flakes that we showed to temporarily inhibit excitatory synapses (without causing inflammation, damage to neurons or other side effects) could be injected in the lateral amygdala when the plasticity associated with memory was consolidated. If the nanomaterial was efficient in blocking excitatory synapses, it should inhibit plasticity and decrease the anxiety related response. And this is what happened: the animals that were administered with graphene flakes, after six days, "forgot" the anxiety related responses, rescuing their behaviour". https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/672615
Basically, it's like bromides. Bonds to nervous system and makes you - what's the word? - docile?
And regarding graphene as "internet interface". Well, she's right there too:
“We have benchmarked graphene against Pedot. Pedot quickly degrades over millions of pulses of stimulation. So that’s why we are super hopeful about graphene, because it actually remains stable for many, many millions of pulses,” she says. “For sure he’s not going to stay with Pedot if he wants to be in the market successfully.” So does Aguilar believe Musk could develop a graphene based implant of his own? “No, he would have to acquire us. There’s many different types of graphene and some are toxic, she says. “We’ve spent eight years developing a manufacturing process, which we’ve patented, that makes graphene the way we want it in the brain. So yes, he will have to buy us.”
Oh I'd love to see all the screenshots of the 6,000 records that "weren't foreign." I don't believe you.
It's easy enough to find, If I linked them you would then say my sources are unreliable. It's a never ending game with you people that I won't play. BTW, I didn't say all 6000 reports were screenshot-ed. That would be ridiculous. I said SOME were shown and they were not foreign.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.