Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So if a POTUS owes 3 billion to Russia or any country, do you think that POTUS can effectively govern given the conflict of interest? I don't, that should be a disqualification!
"So if". if, maybe, could, etc., has ZERO credibility in the real world. These are all we have heard from the left for OVER 5 years now.
"if a frog had wings, he would NOT bump his arse". Since he does NOT have wings, he will CONTINUE to bump his ARSE!
"IF I had BALLS, said the queen, I would be king". She will NEVER be king because she does NOT have balls.
It is asinine and unrealistic to live in the "if", etc. world!
tradition is not the reason he should reveal his tax returns.
his promise to release them as soon as they were done auditing it (which is a dumb reason but whatever) is why he should reveal them.
he's hiding something, whether it be foul play, or something embarrassing.
It is nice to see people who have NEVER changed their mind.
Why would an elected official given up his tax return for the public to see? His tax return, as a private businessman, had nothing to do with his official position as the POTUS.
Now, you would have a point IF Trump was a public official (senator, governor, congressman, etc) prior of becoming POTUS, and his income/tax return came from tax payers. Then yes, we need to see his tax return.
Because its none of your business or anyone else's! The democrats are so damn concerned about his money but could care less about OUR money that they spend freely and without any concern.
The subpoena shouldn't have been issued. It was political.
Based on what, aside from a fanatical devotion to a twice impeached, thrice married moral vacuum who empowered hate speech? Neither of us work for the SDNY so you know the validity of the subpoena and more than I do. And since this ruling was given by a Federal Judge with over 2 decades on the bench....I'm going to say this is not a fishing expedition.
Because its none of your business or anyone else's! The democrats are so damn concerned about his money but could care less about OUR money that they spend freely and without any concern.
OUR business? No, unless they're used as evidence ina trial. The SDNY's business or Congress' business? They absolutely ARE entitled.
The public won't see them unless there is an indictment by a grand jury.
The leaky swamp? This will be a first.
That didn't stop them in Russia, Russia, Russia.... Hell, make **** up like they did last time to try and destroy the mans character.
Hint: There is nothing there to find, or Obama would have nailed him for being an outspoken birther....
The leaky swamp? This will be a first.
That didn't stop them in Russia, Russia, Russia.... Hell, make **** up like they did last time to try and destroy the mans character.
Hint: There is nothing there to find, or Obama would have nailed him for being an outspoken birther....
Hint: Those two topics are totally unrelated.....and Obama was not a member of the SDNY.
1) Obama didn't NEED to do anything about the birther nonsense because all it did was make Trump look bad to any sane American.
2) If Obama HAD done anything, it would have been Federal and Trump could subsequently pardon himself from it. SDNY? Trump has no defense except the truth.
3) In what world do tax returns play into inane conspiracy theories like birtherism?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.