Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Fine, take all the carbon generated technology away from China and Africa and India and all these places that we “gave” this tech to. What a colossal screw up.
Maybe we could try planting a trillion trees like China is doing on the edge of the Gobi Desert.
The North American entire continent east of around the 100th meridian was once covered in dense forest.
So you think over 8 BILLION people have no influence on climate? Wow, and I assume you're not a climate scientist, just some guy trying to make a point with no real idea of how things work on our planet
Is there evidence that 8 billion people have an influence on the earth’s climate? I’m not the one claiming man is causing the climate to change, you are. Are you a climatologist? You have zero credibility to make such an assertion that man is causing the climate to change. What proof can you provide that man is causing the heat spell we are going through?
Is there evidence that 8 billion people have an influence on the earth’s climate? I’m not the one claiming man is causing the climate to change, you are. Are you a climatologist? You have zero credibility to make such an assertion that man is causing the climate to change. What proof can you provide that man is causing the heat spell we are going through?
I trust climate scientists more than end times preachers and talk show hosts bought by the fossil fuel industry.
Temperatures have always swung around wildly. But whenever we have a warm swing, suddenly the global warming enthusiasts come out to predict doom. Then when it swing cold, the global climate change enthusiasts come out to predict doom.
The report is from scientists, not enthusiasts, or alarmists, but I suppose that you like so many others think you know more than trained scientists...You don't.
The report is from scientists, not enthusiasts, or alarmists, but I suppose that you like so many others think you know more than trained scientists...You don't.
"Trained scientists" can also be zealots and alarmists.
Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.
Ha. Yeah, this has been going around for several years how 97% of scientists agree that man is causing climate change. First of all, science isn’t settled by a poll. You fail there. Science is settled by facts and data, not guesses. The truth about science really is that it is never settled. It’s a discovery process where often the guess work is more times wrong than not.
So, what do these 97% of climate scientists agree on? Do these scientists agree we need to stop using fossil fuels? How do we know they agree? When you actually examine this study “the view that the Earth is warming up and human emissions of greenhouse gases are the main cause” is only endorsed by a handful of scientists.
Are you having a serious problem with reading comprehension? I think you need to go back and read that person's post again, very slowly and carefully so it all sinks in.
.
Then you can point out the evidence in this rambling where humans are the cause of climate change?
So there is a consensus among climatologists that man is causing the climate to change? It isn’t possible the climate changes naturally?
Yes to both, but we all know that the real issue here is that the political party that aligns with your side of the culture war is also the party that has a vested interest in preserving the status quo on environmental regulations. The actual science or facts don't matter.
If the Democratic Party denied climate science but positions on all other issues were the same, you would probably be on the front lines fighting for climate action.
We are at 1.1 Deg C (2 Deg F) and going to 1.5 degrees even with radical sudden changes in consumption but we really need to change our habits rapidly.
The increase in global warming is inversely correlated to the NY Times subscription revenue. But good that they're keeping this going for when the COVID panic porn becomes less believable.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think you need to go back and read that person's post again, very slowly and carefully so it all sinks in.