Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I am pro vax choice. Get it if you want it. Just dont make me get it when I already got immunity naturally. Plus with what happened to my father in law, and that covid went thru my house already, i dont advise anyone in my house should get the vax.
What about the rights and choice of the people who cannot be vaccinated or who will not generate a strong immune response to not be exposed to a deadly disease? Your comment only addresses one side of the issue and only addresses the rights of one group of people.
So tossing around anecdotes from unknown people that can't be substantiated is better than actual data.
With the way the media has been hiding facts and the way our political system is cancel culturing opposition, I don't particularly trust all the data.
For what it's worth Covaxin is trying to get US approval for kids. Covaxin is the sole vaccine on the market that is inactivated virus...old school vaccine basically.
What about the rights and choice of the people who cannot be vaccinated or who will not generate a strong immune response to not be exposed to a deadly disease? Your comment only addresses one side of the issue and only addresses the rights of one group of people.
They need to make choices for them.
Immunocompromised individuals have existed forever.
This is nothing new.
Again: If you are terrified of dying if you leave your house you can choose to STAY HOME. Your choice. Have at it.
And if you ARE terrified of dying, why WOULD you leave your house? Makes no sense.
What about the rights and choice of the people who cannot be vaccinated or who will not generate a strong immune response to not be exposed to a deadly disease? Your comment only addresses one side of the issue and only addresses the rights of one group of people.
Re read my post. We agree.. I believe everyone should have the choice. I was responding to someone who made a general statement about antivaxers. Just because someone is choosing not to take this vax doesn’t mean they are actually antivax.
I want a scientist to truly address how they couldn;t figure out the vaccines wane after 6 month.
Should've been very easy to notice that during the initial "trials'.
*crickets*
They knew all along but just lied. They knew if they came out right away that this would wane and you’ll need boosters every 6months to a year, many people wouldn’t even bother. I posted a study back in April on CD showing nAbs waning at 6 months, but was ignored.
In reality, Pfizer begins waning after 2 months, by 6 months it’s essentially worthless at preventing infection.
They knew all along but just lied. They knew if they came out right away that this would wane and you’ll need boosters every 6months to a year, many people wouldn’t even bother. I posted a study back in April on CD showing nAbs waning at 6 months, but was ignored.
In reality, Pfizer begins waning after 2 months, by 6 months it’s essentially worthless at preventing infection.
Exactly.
They have proved over and over that the data is not accurate.
And anyone who can't understand something as simple as: The trials WOULD have shown vaccines waning after six months, which means that they are NOT effective. And the researchers and scientists would have known this.
Has been thoroughly brainwashed. And posts here keep trying to get their brains dirty again.
The brush I paint the world with, must be smaller than yours.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.