Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-05-2022, 02:07 PM
 
17,311 posts, read 12,263,996 times
Reputation: 17263

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
oil production is DOWN from 2019

Year..........Jan...........Feb...........Mar..... .....Apr...........May..........Jun...........Jul. ..........Aug..........Sep...........oct.......... nov.............dec
2019........11,869 11,673 11,913 12,149 12,154 12,218 11,902 12,486 12,590 12,809 13,000 12,978
2020........12,852 12,842 12,797 11,914 9,713 10,442 11,006 10,577 10,921 10,457 11,196 11,168
2021........11,124 9,925 11,326 11,305 11,356 11,356 11,347 11,277 10,918 11,569 11,790 11,634
2022........11,369 11,316 11,701 11,668 11,629 11,788 11,800


https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/Le...s=MCRFPUS2&f=M

Release Date: 9/30/2022
Next Release Date: 10/31/2022
OK? It's up since Biden took over after crashing with Trump. No?

It took nearly 3 years of "Trump policies" to build up to that level. No?

We're currently well above 2018 levels. At the same point in the presidency Biden has an extra 1,000 barrels a day.

This despite all the shutdowns during the pandemic and the significant time it can take to get things going again.

As much as a president can directly impact oil production(not much) things are going rather well for Biden in that regard in comparison.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-05-2022, 02:11 PM
 
5,946 posts, read 2,765,554 times
Reputation: 3453
Maybe Biden is secretly in bed with the O&G industry, that's why we're all being punished by high gas prices! LOL

Remember when the Left slandered Bush on that in 2007/08? They were saying things like this: "He's a Texas guy, he wants high oil to make money", arrgghhhh!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2022, 02:26 PM
 
574 posts, read 299,647 times
Reputation: 1195
Prices up .30 per gallon overnight for regular unleaded where we live NE of Dallas. Thanks brandon!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2022, 02:31 PM
 
Location: NYC
5,209 posts, read 4,675,356 times
Reputation: 7985
I find this guy very informed.

https://www.tiktok.com/@mrglobaltoo/...97953992674606

Watch him if you don't want the political angle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2022, 02:34 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,435 posts, read 60,638,057 times
Reputation: 61054
Quote:
Originally Posted by AfricanSunset View Post
Let's separate the oil you put in your car (Americans sometimes say 'gas' what europeans call benzene) from the gas Europeans need to heat their homes.

Benzene has always been high in Europe - roughly between 8-11$ a gallon with exchange rate and conversion of liters to gallons.

Gas to heat homes has been low, is still not that bad, but will spike this winter for sure.
Much of that higher price, though, is not due to the cost of "benzene" but higher, much higher, liquid fuel taxes than in the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2022, 03:46 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
11,350 posts, read 16,717,087 times
Reputation: 13394
Up .24 cents overnight and I'm sure this is only the beginning.

Thank you Joe as this will clearly back fire on the dems with the upcoming election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2022, 03:49 PM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,142 posts, read 18,298,681 times
Reputation: 35024
Gonna happen no matter who you blame.

Everything that is high now will go higher.
And soon that extra 15% tax will be put on companies to send retail prices even higher.
And then the Fed says there's 2 more rate hikes in the coming months.


We're being set up for a perfect storm here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2022, 03:59 PM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,836 posts, read 17,115,957 times
Reputation: 11535
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMSRetired View Post
Gonna happen no matter who you blame.

Everything that is high now will go higher.
And soon that extra 15% tax will be put on companies to send retail prices even higher.
And then the Fed says there's 2 more rate hikes in the coming months.


We're being set up for a perfect storm here.
All it's going to take is an invasion of Taiwan by the CCP prior to the midterms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2022, 04:03 PM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,142 posts, read 18,298,681 times
Reputation: 35024
Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD View Post
All it's going to take is an invasion of Taiwan by the CCP prior to the midterms.
Well we are trying to get China to do something as we are keeping our warships there and politicians keep going there to tout how the US will defend them.

Just a matter of time. The US "war games" have moved from the Black Sea to the Taiwan Strait.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2022, 05:12 PM
 
29,543 posts, read 19,636,351 times
Reputation: 4554
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post

Yes necessarily. The pipeline if not axed would have injected much more Canadian oil into the market through the US and it's refineries than is currently being trucked or railed through. Also with less risk of environmental accidents as well. At the time the presidential cross-border permit was revoked, construction of the 1,120-mile Keystone XL segment was on track to be completed in 2022, with operations starting in early 2023. Much better than asking petty dictators to ramp up their oil production which is what we are doing now don't you think?

From Harvard Magazine written by Butler professor of environmental studies Michael B. McElroy back in 2013



Quote:
can minimize environmental damage. From the U.S. perspective, there are sound economic and security reasons to encourage development of the Canadian resource. Subject to the conditions noted here, I would recommend that the Keystone XL project should be approved.
https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2013...ne-xl-pipeline
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top