Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-05-2023, 10:58 AM
 
30,907 posts, read 32,984,452 times
Reputation: 26919

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by UNC4Me View Post
They only pretend to care when it’s the other party in the WH. Otherwise they’re all good with their guy running up the deficit.
Conservatives? Yes. Exactly.

 
Old 05-05-2023, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,233 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15621
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
This tells us otherwise. The bottom 90% are paying LESS than their fair share. The top 1% pays nearly twice their fair share. BOTH need to be changed. The bottom 90% needs to pay more. The top 1% needs tax relief:



Here's the actual IRS data if you don't believe the chart. It goes all the way to even breaking out the top 0.001%:

https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/20in41ts.xls
The top 3 billionaires have more wealth than the bottom 50 % of the nation and your worried about their tax rate. We have the greatest income disparity in the world. Maybe they would have to knock off a trip to space here and there or give up one of their super yachts.

Article from 2017, I assume the disparity is worse now.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/noahkir...h=5fe74ae33cf8
 
Old 05-05-2023, 11:07 AM
 
50,721 posts, read 36,411,320 times
Reputation: 76530
Quote:
Originally Posted by VA Yankee View Post
If there below the poverty level and trying to survive I have no issue, if they are doing it by creative money hiding I have an issue. What source is claiming that its 50%
A lot of those are elderly, too. My mother didn't have to pay taxes for the last 20 years of her life, because she only had about $1500 a month income and didn't reach the threshold required. That's after working her entire adult life, so not a freeloader. My fiance's parents don't either, they live in low income senior housing on about $600 a month or so. A lot of elderly have low enough incomes that they don't have to pay, but still worked their entire lives.
 
Old 05-05-2023, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,861 posts, read 26,482,831 times
Reputation: 25753
Lets be honest-neither of the two mainstream parties is willing to do what is actually important. Cut spending. Secure our borders. Set limits on immigration and asylum seekers. Stop spending on "foreign aid", including Ukraine. Strengthening our economy. Securing actual fair-trade deals. Both want to spend, spend, spend.
 
Old 05-05-2023, 11:16 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
The top 3 billionaires have more wealth than the bottom 50 % of the nation and your worried about their tax rate. We have the greatest income disparity in the world. Maybe they would have to knock off a trip to space here and there or give up one of their super yachts.

Article from 2017, I assume the disparity is worse now.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/noahkir...h=5fe74ae33cf8
Yes, we do have a large income disparity and that's BECAUSE the left REFUSES to tax like the European countries do, regressively.

European countries have LOWER Gini Coefficient ratings than the US, which means they are far more socioeconomically equitable.

We can have that in the US, too, if the left would only agree to tax regressively.

This explains it, with suggestions to more reading if you're having a hard time wrapping your mind around WHY progressive taxation results in much greater income inequality:

Other countries don't have a 47% - Washington Post
 
Old 05-05-2023, 11:23 AM
Status: "Let this year be over..." (set 16 days ago)
 
Location: Where my bills arrive
19,219 posts, read 17,075,134 times
Reputation: 15537
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
This tells us otherwise. The bottom 90% are paying LESS than their fair share. The top 1% pays nearly twice their fair share. BOTH need to be changed. The bottom 90% needs to pay more. The top 1% needs tax relief:



Here's the actual IRS data if you don't believe the chart. It goes all the way to even breaking out the top 0.001%:

https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/20in41ts.xls
Again I didn't question the chart/link you posted before. As I said which is a greater impact the person living at or below the poverty level trying to support a family of 4 or a millionaire who can take their $3,5 million dollar obligation and reduce it down to near nothing?

The top 1% need tax relief, spare me the chart only says they pay taxes , doesn't say how much of the full bill their paying and the example I posted show where they can often be paying none.
 
Old 05-05-2023, 11:32 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13681
Quote:
Originally Posted by VA Yankee View Post
Again I didn't question the chart/link you posted before. As I said which is a greater impact the person living at or below the poverty level trying to support a family of 4 or a millionaire who can take their $3,5 million dollar obligation and reduce it down to near nothing?
I'm not seeing any evidence that millionaires are reducing their multi-million dollar incomes to the point where they pay zero in taxes. In fact, the IRS data states quite the opposite: the higher one's income, the fewer deductions one is able to take.

Quote:
The top 1% need tax relief, spare me the chart only says they pay taxes , doesn't say how much of the full bill their paying and the example I posted show where they can often be paying none.
If that were true, the top 1% wouldn't be paying nearly twice their fair share, which they are. They'd be much more like the bottom 90%, UNDER-paying their fair share.
 
Old 05-05-2023, 11:48 AM
 
13,602 posts, read 4,926,293 times
Reputation: 9687
Quote:
Originally Posted by RetireinPA View Post
ok, so in the last 20 year the gop controlled it for 2, as per you and you are taking THEM to task and not the 18 years of dem increases? yeah ok.
I was only going back 5 or 6 years. If you want to go back 20 years, Republicans controlled the House 12 out of 20 years, the Senate 12 out of 20 (not always the same years) and the POTUS 10 years. GOP had complete control 6 years (2003 - 2006 and 2017-18). Democrats 4 years (2009-10 and 2021-22).
 
Old 05-05-2023, 11:56 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo58 View Post
I was only going back 5 or 6 years. If you want to go back 20 years, Republicans controlled the House 12 out of 20 years, the Senate 12 out of 20 (not always the same years) and the POTUS 10 years. GOP had complete control 6 years (2003 - 2006 and 2017-18). Democrats 4 years (2009-10 and 2021-22).
In which years did the GOP have a filibuster-proof Senate? Oh, yeah... NONE.
 
Old 05-05-2023, 11:58 AM
 
7 posts, read 4,262 times
Reputation: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo58 View Post
I was only going back 5 or 6 years. If you want to go back 20 years, Republicans controlled the House 12 out of 20 years, the Senate 12 out of 20 (not always the same years) and the POTUS 10 years. GOP had complete control 6 years (2003 - 2006 and 2017-18). Democrats 4 years (2009-10 and 2021-22).
When Republicans propose or pass spending or tax cuts, the Democrats scream that the Republicans are throwing granny off a cliff and the media supports the Democrats.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top