Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you're only going to continue a shouting match and making false assumptions about me when you don't know me at all, there is no point in us responding to one another's posts.
I don't want women controlled and punished. 50% of women are pro-life (my definition of pro-life) as well - consider that.
They are not false assumptions....I have read your posts and I, too, get to have an opinion.
You are against a woman having the right to choose....therefore you must fear women and obviously want to control them.
Everyone is Pro-life. YOU are Anti-Free Choice. You never answer questions.
They are not false assumptions....I have read your posts and I, too, get to have an opinion.
You are against a woman having the right to choose....therefore you must fear women and obviously want to control them.
Everyone is Pro-life. YOU are Anti-Free Choice. You never answer questions.
I don't fear women, nor do I want to control them. It's about protecting the unborn child.
I am not anti-free choice; I'm anti-right to end a life.
I responded to Post 91 (delusianne's) a few minutes ago.
You fail to understand the pro-life stance. It's about protecting the unborn child/fetus. We don't feel that an absolute right to "choose" should extend to those situations in which it requires the ending of another life.
She has choices before a pregnancy ever occurs - abstinence, a million different contraceptives, even sterilization. She also has the option of adoption if she does not want to raise a child.
Taking away the right to end a life is not "controlling and punishing" in my mind, nor in the mind of 50% of other Americans...including 50% of women themselves.
I responded to Post 91 (delusianne's) a few minutes ago.
You fail to understand the pro-life stance. It's about protecting the unborn child/fetus. We don't feel that an absolute right to "choose" should extend to those situations in which it requires the ending of another life.
She has choices before a pregnancy ever occurs - abstinence, a million different contraceptives, even sterilization. She also has the option of adoption if she does not want to raise a child.
Woulda coulda shoulda...and yet life is gray. Wouldnt you rather AB be "safe, legal and rare" for the times when it does wind up happening?
And yet life is gray. Wouldnt you rather AB be "safe, legal and rare" for the times when it does wind up happening?
Ideally, I'd like it banned. But if large numbers of women would have illegal/dangerous abortions, I might support it being kept legal during the first trimester only while working to make it as rare as possible.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
