Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Listen, I will play a video game now and then, but it's not going to show up on my 'top 20 things about me' list.
I would I mean I see no shame in mentioning I like video games. I figure I should put all my "childish" and "geeky" interests and hobbies up front if its going to turn them off. I think it would benefit both parties they ignore me, I might get someone who's down with it everybody wins.
I would I mean I see no shame in mentioning I like video games. I figure I should put all my "childish" and "geeky" interests and hobbies up front if its going to turn them off. I think it would benefit both parties they ignore me, I might get someone who's down with it everybody wins.
Yes, I would too. I have utterly no shame in mentioning my interest gaming. This is 2012, after all, there are plenty of professional Starcraft 2 players who have sponsors and make money hand over fist, just like regular athletes.
Location: Huntersville/Charlotte, NC and Washington, DC
26,700 posts, read 41,763,058 times
Reputation: 41381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inebriated Duck
Yes, I would too. I have utterly no shame in mentioning my interest gaming. This is 2012, after all, there are plenty of professional Starcraft 2 players who have sponsors and make money hand over fist, just like regular athletes.
Can us Madden and Call of Duty players get some love too?
Yu-Gi-Oh! in Japan was not meant for little kids. It was a serious anime show. United States screwed Yu-Gi-Oh! up and turned it "childish". So no, I do not consider Yu-Gi-Oh! trading card game for little kids only. I consider it equivalent on the same level as Poker or Blackjack.
While I don't particularly trust all media or the government, I'm generally turned off by conspiracy theories because they're generally a bunch of crap. You would've lost me right there. That and the early 20s.
There are some other interesting qualities in there, but the fact that the cars were placed higher in that sequence of seemingly important personal details makes me think that the cars are among the most important factors and that they're implied as personal "qualities" when in fact they are not (they're material items). I'd also question how an unemployed, early 20s student affords not only one, but two cars, especially since one is quite expensive. I'd think you were either a drug dealer or a spoiled brat - neither of which appeals to me.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
