Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-22-2013, 12:00 PM
 
Location: On the corner of Grey Street
6,126 posts, read 10,123,619 times
Reputation: 11797

Advertisements

I see both sides of this. Everyone is entitled to want what they want. I don't think OP should keep dating this woman knowing he's not attracted to her in some sort of effort to avoid being shallow. He should let her down as easy as possible and he should definitely not go into detail about why, although I'm sure any woman with half a brain could make the connection that everything was going great until he saw her body.

However, it's not easy to make a great connection with someone. OP obviously enjoyed talking to and getting to know this woman prior to this incident. No one is ever going to be perfect and have every quality inside and out that you desire. I am not suggesting that you settle for anyone who comes along, but sometimes you have to be realistic with your expectations. I'm not saying you go for someone 100 pounds over weight, but for me personally, a few extra pounds here or whatever other small physical flaw would NOT be a reason to dump someone I was really enjoying getting to know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-22-2013, 12:02 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 37,058,884 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by strawberrykiki View Post
I'm not saying you go for someone 100 pounds over weight, but for me personally, a few extra pounds here or whatever other small physical flaw would NOT be a reason to dump someone I was really enjoying getting to know.

It's a non factor for me as well. But I don't have a model body either. Now, if they stunk in bed, that's another story...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 12:14 PM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
16,959 posts, read 17,383,951 times
Reputation: 30258
A woman's body is ever changing. I never been with a woman that doesn't have some sort of stretch marks; even the thin athletic types...with no kids.

just another thread meant to rile up women. Hook line and sinker
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 12:18 PM
 
Location: The Hall of Justice
25,901 posts, read 42,763,786 times
Reputation: 42769
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
You made decision to get to that point. You could abort at that point. Totally your decision.

If I get a big tattoo across my chest (one that realistically can't be removed without drastic expense and work) and I meet a girl, take my shirt off when we get to that point, and she HATES tattoos. Would you criticize her for not wanting to sleep with me if she liked me mentally, emotionally, and chemistry wise?

I wouldn't. I made that choice. That choice has consequences. She wasn't happy with how I am physically. The end.
It would be more like your going to work, being involved in an industrial accident, and being somewhat disfigured for the rest of your life. It was your choice to go to work, yes. Your disfigurement was an unintended consequence of going to work, not something you deliberately did to yourself like a tattoo.

Look, I understand about physical preferences. I didn't give the OP any grief about it. But you said that stretch marks can be exercised away, and they can't. Then you said that they can be avoided altogether, which is true if women terminate their pregnancies before knowing whether they will get stretch marks or not.

By the way, I got stretch marks on my legs when I was 12. I grew six inches in two years, and then four more inches in the next four years. Those marks weren't the result of pregnancy, just being unusually tall. I didn't get much of a choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 12:23 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 37,058,884 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustJulia View Post
It would be more like your going to work, being involved in an industrial accident, and being somewhat disfigured for the rest of your life. It was your choice to go to work, yes. Your disfigurement was an unintended consequence of going to work, not something you deliberately did to yourself like a tattoo.

Look, I understand about physical preferences. I didn't give the OP any grief about it. But you said that stretch marks can be exercised away, and they can't. Then you said that they can be avoided altogether, which is true if women terminate their pregnancies before knowing whether they will get stretch marks or not.

By the way, I got stretch marks on my legs when I was 12. I grew six inches in two years, and then four more inches in the next four years. Those marks weren't the result of pregnancy, just being unusually tall. I didn't get much of a choice.

Again, you use a horrible analogy. As a debilitating / disfiguring accident is rare. Body changes from pregnancy are not. In addition, not working isn't a realistic choice. Not having offspring is a perfectly fine choice.

Where did I say "stretch" marks could be exercised away? I didn't. What the OP was talking about wasn't tiger claws, but loose skin, a flabby belly. They are different. Even if you can't exercise that away (a few people won't be able to, a pretty small percentage), it can be fixed. For some reason people are making this out to be about stretch marks, it isn't.

Don't attribute words to me that I didn't say. Thank you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 12:27 PM
 
2,087 posts, read 2,853,839 times
Reputation: 1561
Quote:
Originally Posted by strawberrykiki View Post
I see both sides of this. Everyone is entitled to want what they want.
I think that if you fit within most people's preferences, then you think it's great.

If you fit within nobody's physical preferences, then it sucks.

I think people just change the definition of 'shallow' to fit their particular situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 12:41 PM
 
2,758 posts, read 4,966,504 times
Reputation: 3014
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dewdrop93 View Post
Women cannot control everything that having a child does to their body. They can lose the weight and stay in shape - but you can't control what your SKIN does after you have a baby. That's up to your genetics. Some women don't get stretch marks. Some do. Some don't have stretch marks but are left with extra skin that just won't go back. It happens. There's really nothing you can do about it.

But all that is neither here nor there. The OP has a problem with it and so all the rest doesn't really matter. Whether or not the OP is shallow doesn't really matter either. It is what it is. Also - let me say this. She didn't have the OP's children. I think that makes a HUGE difference. A husband who is in love with his wife probably isn't going to mind her having stretch marks or extra skin on her tummy after she has given birth to his children. But the OP isn't in love with this woman and she didn't give birth to his children. And like I said before, I wouldn't want to be with someone that wasn't totally attracted to me.

I dated a woman re: bolded.
Quite attractive woman. Took care of herself really well except working out frequently. Very pretty, tall, curvy, and thin.

But her stomach has this extra unproportional belly going on (mother of 2). And she was extremely self conscience about it. Funny thing is, this woman ghosted me! Haha, I guess I didnt look/be good enough for her! Imagine that. Here I am, ok with her stomach, and she's like, this guy doesnt do it for me. We got along really well. Had fun, all that. I'm guessing she didnt have that spark she needed with me.

I think everyone has the right to their preferences. If the OP isn't into her because of her tummy, then so be it.
He's 40 and never married. Maybe he is better off that way. Most people that are going to settle down do it before 40, so there is probably a huge reason he never settled down and got married. Can you convince me any man or woman that easily obtains dates but never gets married into the 40's or 30's even is single because they cant find their perfect match ? NEVER.

OP is single for a reason. Sounds like he isnt just sleeping with women and ghosting cause they aren't good enough. So let him have his standards.

Society places so much importance on height, hair, money, looks, whatever.
If everyone else is allowed to have standards, then why not the OP ?

And if he is a balding out of shape fat dude looking for a VS model, well, good luck with that. But even then, that guy will likely be single forever anyway, so who cares ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 12:41 PM
 
Location: No longer in Queens, NY
863 posts, read 1,131,154 times
Reputation: 1074
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJS99 View Post
I think that if you fit within most people's preferences, then you think it's great.

If you fit within nobody's physical preferences, then it sucks.

I think people just change the definition of 'shallow' to fit their particular situation.
Good point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 12:43 PM
 
Location: On the corner of Grey Street
6,126 posts, read 10,123,619 times
Reputation: 11797
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJS99 View Post
I think that if you fit within most people's preferences, then you think it's great.

If you fit within nobody's physical preferences, then it sucks.

I think people just change the definition of 'shallow' to fit their particular situation.
Think what is great? Not everyone has the same physical preferences anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 12:45 PM
 
Location: The Hall of Justice
25,901 posts, read 42,763,786 times
Reputation: 42769
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
Again, you use a horrible analogy. As a debilitating / disfiguring accident is rare. Body changes from pregnancy are not. In addition, not working isn't a realistic choice. Not having offspring is a perfectly fine choice.
Sure, to someone who does not want children. Aborting my husband's children because of stretch marks was not a perfectly fine choice, especially with the motive that somebody else someday might not find my body appealing. If that makes sense to you, keep on trucking I guess.

How about car accidents? Or any accident, really. My husband broke his collarbone years ago and has a weird lump there now. It was his choice to ride that motorcycle. Still not the same thing as going to a tattoo parlor and getting something inked on your chest.

Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
Where did I say "stretch" marks could be exercised away? I didn't. What the OP was talking about wasn't tiger claws, but loose skin, a flabby belly. They are different. Even if you can't exercise that away (a few people won't be able to, a pretty small percentage), it can be fixed. For some reason people are making this out to be about stretch marks, it isn't.

Don't attribute words to me that I didn't say. Thank you.
Fair enough. However, stretch marks do not heal shut, because the skin is scarred. The lack of elasticity is what causes the loose skin. Scars do not usually go away and return to acting like normal skin. It's like telling someone to try to exercise the scars on their hands or knees away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top