Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-06-2020, 12:18 PM
 
7,235 posts, read 7,043,473 times
Reputation: 12265

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MillennialUrbanist View Post


Objectively, I'm not unattractive, I'm average. But women deem 80% of men to be unattractive. Therefore, most men are in danger of being accused of sexual harrassment.
Do you just have a database of this stuff that you copy and paste from?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2020, 06:08 PM
 
7,019 posts, read 3,754,477 times
Reputation: 3257
Quote:
Originally Posted by MillennialUrbanist View Post
He was unattractive, plain and simple. When you're an unattractive man, even saying "good morning" to a woman is sexual harrassment. But not saying it is also sexual harrassment, for failing to acknowledge her. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Welcome to the new America!
You are right, Sexual Harrassment means "No sexual attraction"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2020, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Crook County, Hellinois
5,820 posts, read 3,880,993 times
Reputation: 8123
Quote:
Originally Posted by MinivanDriver View Post
No. Any given woman finds 80% of men to be unattractive. And each woman has her own, unique 80%.
Not necessarily. While there are preferences in things like facial hair, most male traits are uniform in attractiveness to women, like height (6'0" or taller) and muscles (six-pack abs and such). There are also men that are universally attractive to all women; they get hot, steamy sex on a first date even after taking a woman to McDonald's on a city bus. Now, they never have to worry about sexual harassment charges, except in extremely rare circumstances.

The rest of us have to play it safe, to avoid getting ourselves MeToo'ed and our careers ruined, deservedly or otherwise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2020, 06:19 AM
 
3,926 posts, read 2,038,358 times
Reputation: 2768
Quote:
Originally Posted by MillennialUrbanist View Post


Objectively, I'm not unattractive, I'm average. But women deem 80% of men to be unattractive. Therefore, most men are in danger of being accused of sexual harrassment.
Que the SNL sexual harassment sketch.

https://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-l...nd-you/2751966
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2020, 08:15 AM
 
10,503 posts, read 7,050,936 times
Reputation: 32344
Quote:
Originally Posted by MillennialUrbanist View Post
Not necessarily. While there are preferences in things like facial hair, most male traits are uniform in attractiveness to women, like height (6'0" or taller) and muscles (six-pack abs and such). There are also men that are universally attractive to all women; they get hot, steamy sex on a first date even after taking a woman to McDonald's on a city bus. Now, they never have to worry about sexual harassment charges, except in extremely rare circumstances.

The rest of us have to play it safe, to avoid getting ourselves MeToo'ed and our careers ruined, deservedly or otherwise.
You know, I'm a guy who successfully dated and then married one helluva woman after a whirlwind three-month courtship. But one thing's for sure. I never got laid on the first date. Nor did I try, at least once I got out of adolescence. If that's what you deem to be successful dating, then small wonder you're sitting at home alone on your Saturday nights.

Here you can't get out of the starter's blocks when it comes to relationships, yet you're offering up a bunch of pseudo-sociological nonsense rather than listen to some basic common sense. Maybe you should stop nursing these ridiculous and convoluted theories and start listening to those who have actually been successful in this realm of life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2020, 03:35 PM
 
8,779 posts, read 9,458,244 times
Reputation: 9548
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThisTown123 View Post
We are not talking about managers dating their subordinates....we're talking about employee/employee dating
Which can still create an unfair environment depending on the business type.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2020, 03:38 PM
 
Location: Texas
13,480 posts, read 8,392,424 times
Reputation: 25948
Quote:
Originally Posted by rego00123 View Post
Which can still create an unfair environment depending on the business type.
There are already plenty of unfair relationships in the business world due to nepotism (hiring relatives). This has been pointed out time and time again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2020, 05:15 AM
 
3,926 posts, read 2,038,358 times
Reputation: 2768
Quote:
Originally Posted by PriscillaVanilla View Post
There are already plenty of unfair relationships in the business world due to nepotism (hiring relatives). This has been pointed out time and time again.
Right, and no one is going to stop this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2020, 09:24 AM
 
Location: Texas
13,480 posts, read 8,392,424 times
Reputation: 25948
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThisTown123 View Post
Right, and no one is going to stop this.
Right. So it matters very little that people date in the workplace, as far as favoritism is concerned. There are already tons of people in business who are relatives of each other, or married to each other. Owners tend to hire their relatives, sons, daughters, wives, spouses of sons and daughters, nieces, nephews, etc. There is definitely favoritism even if you subtract workplace dating.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2020, 09:39 AM
 
Location: North Dakota
10,349 posts, read 13,958,144 times
Reputation: 18283
Quote:
Originally Posted by mags61 View Post
The McDonald's CEO was fired for having a consensual relationship with a co-worker. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/04/b...ceo-fired.html
These kinds of workplace romances are becoming more unacceptable at many companies and not just with management. Every company I've worked for strongly discourages inter-office relationships of this kind.
This is a warning to be careful how you conduct yourself at work because what was once accepted or even encouraged could now get anyone in trouble or even terminated.
It is never a good idea to seek out co-workers for romantic relationships. You go to work to do the jobs you are assigned, not to fish in the company pond.
I say take it a step further and don't be friends with coworkers. Keep your work and personal lives separate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top