Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Everyone who screamed they feared sharia law in the U.S. but thinks this woman is doing the right thing needs to be slapped.
Here is the force of religious intolerance over civil law and it is ugly.
I hope she is jailed for a long time.
Why not just go ahead and execute her publically? Long term imprisonment for a misdemeanor offense, really? The only ugly thing is when our government decided to rule for immorality.
Why not just go ahead and execute her publically? Long term imprisonment for a misdemeanor offense, really? The only ugly thing is when our government decided to rule for immorality.
Why not just go ahead and execute her publically? Long term imprisonment for a misdemeanor offense, really? The only ugly thing is when our government decided to rule for immorality.
You sound like a 7 year old who didn't get extra recess.
Your "morality" based on a religious text is irrelevant. Fortunately, the US government is (supposed to be) above "God" and Religion. If you want to live in a theocracy, move to the Middle East.
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,928,903 times
Reputation: 4561
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffbase40
Why not just go ahead and execute her publically? Long term imprisonment for a misdemeanor offense, really? The only ugly thing is when our government decided to rule for immorality.
Why not just have her do the job that shebswore an oath to do?
Or do fundamentalist Christians not take oaths seriously?
I'm a straight married man, and I most certainly do have a dog in this fight. Civil rights are my dog in this and every fight.
I think the very idea that just because someone being denied the equal treatment of the law is of a different class than me, that therefore that denial is irrelevant to me, is an appalling idea. And even if someone is completely self-center and about only themselves and those about whom they care, their own rights and the rights of those they love are best protected by demanding the equal protection of the law for all.
Why not just have her do the job that shebswore an oath to do?
Or do fundamentalist Christians not take oaths seriously?
Obviously she doesn't, she's on marriage number 4.
Can't keep her sworn oath to her husband that she made before god, or the one to do her job.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
