Hi again everyone,
I thought the forum would send me email updates, but after the first post after my last one, it stopped sending updates. When I logged back in today it suddenly sent me another update, of the very last message. Does anyone know if I am supposed to stay logged in in order to get updates, or what the issue may be?
Anyway, my apologies for being late. I won't be able to promptly address everything that's been said since my last post, but I can address at least some things right away.
allan1015:
"Thank you Carma and Ben, especially Ben for doing what my temperament or style of communicating didn't allow for. You continue to amaze and teach me."
This is tremendously kind of you, Allan (and I agree about Carma, too). I'm honored.
"Another was simply to see what truths about MP I could pull. I am about to do my 2cd initiation, and this was the last in a long process of investigation."
Very sensible of you... I'm glad you're carrying out the investigation suggested for new students
.
"In the end two main observations:
Money - I like the learning I am getting for what I am paying. For $400 bucks a year or so, I am learning stuff that after years of spiritual searching I find finally seem to put all the pieces together. I've spent much more for a less quality learning experience.
MP is not ripping me off in terms of $, I am getting value for my $ so to speak."
I guess some believe what MysticPhD wrote- "if it costs money . . . it has NOTHING to do with spirituality"
The idea that everything involved with spirituality should be free is one that perplexes me. Once a path grows to a size larger than one person can manage entirely on their own, some form of cost to others is going to be involved. I suppose if Sri Gary had utilized many more people like end_of_faith, everything could have been financially free for the rest of us, but that is still costing someone something- energy, time, skill, etc.
Now, in the literal sense, I agree with MysticPhD. The spirituality itself is free. I don't pay anybody to do my spiritual exercises, nor for my spiritual highs. But the guidance which I like to utilize which exists in print and audio form, and attending events in large hotels? That part costs money. And I'm happy to pay it. Anybody who doesn't want to pay doesn't have to.
As for the rest of MysticPhD's comment:
"No true spiritual master would deny access to his/her guidance because of finances . ... it is completely incongruent with the claimed spiritual development."
It is my understanding that those without the means to pay can get a waiver. As I described before, without even asking for it, I was the beneficiary of an 80% reduction in my dues.
end_of_faith
"First, I would like to say that I appreciated, and was very moved by what you shared regarding the chela/pilot who died. He was a special soul, and it was in honoring him that we connected and shared. For that, I am grateful."
I'm glad
.
"here are a few quotes by allan on this forum, and it seems clear that he is referencing you as a friend, and in his last post he seems to be referencing who I am assuming might be your mom...."
Carma is shakey1, not my mother.
"I don't know many strangers who I know their mom's name. And he speaks as though he has had real life experience in being around you."
Yep, I doubt he knows my mother's name
. Otherwise, Allan and I have interacted slightly on another forum, and that's it.
"That’s also an interesting disclaimer you state before taking it upon yourself to discredit the experience of all who express opposing viewpoint to yours or Gary’s."
I recall writing that your experience is true, by definition. I can't dispute your experience, and I have no criticisms of you as a person.
Back to what you wrote. I'll quote myself, assuming this is the disclaimer which you're referring to- "You are all certainly welcome to your own opinions, and it doesn't bother me in the slightest if someone very strongly does not want to be a member of MasterPath. In fact, I'm quite glad when that is the case- as Jesus purportedly said: "Be either hot or cold, but if you are lukewarm I will spew you from my mouth". If you're not hot, I'm glad you're cold. It will help you make progress with whatever other path in life you've chosen."
The whole point is to support your path. If it is something other than MasterPath, so be it. If your path is to attempt to discredit MasterPath, so be it. Why would I support you attempting to discredit MasterPath? The same reason I'd support any other whole-hearted action, by myself or anyone else- we learn quickest that way. We get to the end of the road the fastest when this happens. I believe you will most speedily discover the pros and cons of what you're doing, by doing it. "Act to know", as Sri Gary says. You're acting, and I admire it. In fact, I admire you more, in this area, than I admire myself.
"Sorry, but I have difficulty believing what you say is the “whole truth.” Being aware of the “chela grapevine” that runs through MP, it is very unlikely that simple happenstance allowed you to “stumble upon this forum.” I also do not believe in “coincidence.” Everything happens for a reason…isn’t that a “part” of the “whole truth” you claim to know so well?"
I arrived at this forum by googling [masterpath temecula house], since a friend of a chela friend of mine was asking about the rumors she had read online that Sri Gary owned a $3million house. I was trying to track the rumor down, since in regards to this rumor Sri Gary had mentioned at a seminar that his rent is $600 a month. I wonder if there even are any homes that expensive in the desert around Temecula.
Anyway, considering you didn't know who I was, and I don't know who you are, despite our overlapping times on MasterPath, perhaps the chela grapevine isn't all-encompassing
.
"It is also very presumptuous and arrogant for you to assume that you know the depth of intensity of another’s devotion and love for truth, or the journey they’ve traveled."
Where did I ever claim I did? For what it's worth, I would guess you must be capable of intense devotion, to have done all the seva you did. You may have been more devoted than I've ever been. You may still be, for all I know, in your way.
"And by that, I mean regardless if they have ever even heard of MP or not! MasterPath is not the culmination of the soul’s overall journey in consciousness. Not even close."
I agree with you, and Sri Gary agrees with you. The outer form of the path is not the culmination of soul's journey, as Sri Gary has repeatedly emphasized.
"Your interpretation and application of that spiritual principle points to an attitude of “spiritual superiority” that you are on the path of truth, while those who reject MP are “cold”. That spiritual principle has absolutely nothing to do with belonging to an “organized religious following” like MasterPath."
You can call yourself "hot", if you like, and I can be the "cold" one. It just refers to being very committed- whether it's in pursuing MasterPath, or going in another direction.
By the way, I never claimed to possess the "whole truth", and hope I never do so. I think my mind will never have and never will possess the whole truth, and I don't think I will ever be able to completely communicate soul's truth. But I think the quest for the whole truth is very valuable.
And this is why, in general, from my own personal perspective, I think it's much more valuable for me to listen to what you have to say, than for me to say things I already know. I gain a lot more pieces of the puzzle from hearing your real, honest experience, than by rehashing and reassessing my own experience.
As far as my skepticism about your claims is concerned, it just comes from the fact that we're often hearing only one side of the story, and I think important information is missing. But it doesn't mean you shouldn't share it- it's still a piece of the puzzle, at a minimum.
It's true that I've disputed some things where I had every reason to suspect what you said was wrong or hearsay, and I turned out to be at least partly wrong. On the other hand, I think I've contributed some valuable information you left out.
I don't want to shut anyone down, as I think you may have felt I'm trying to do. Please, share away. To quote myself again- "I just want to defend the truth, so everyone can form their judgments from a true basis. One of the few things we are asked to do is defend the truth. And by that, I understand it to mean the whole truth, from the seemingly good to the seemingly bad. I'm happy to hear the genuine truth others are aware of, as well." You would be one of those "others"- everyone is included in that, not just chelas.
"And didn’t Jesus, Buddha, Gandhi, Sawan, Soami, Lao Tzu, Hafiz, Nanak, Kabir, St. Francis of Assisi, Meister Eckhart, plus so many more truly advanced spiritual souls actually make a difference in the world? What difference does Gary make in the world?"
He's made a profound difference in my life, and in the lives of other chelas I know. And from that there's a great ripple effect. Bu the first part- the difference made in my life- is the most important part, to me.
"Has he contributed to effecting positive social change on any level, or does his real success lie in the fact that he has remained under the radar of close scrutiny by the public?"
Well, as Sri Gary has repeatedly stated, he's not here to make the world a better place- he's described it as perfectly being what it's meant to be. It seems silly to criticize someone for not doing what they said they weren't trying to do.
His stated mission is to get souls off the wheel of reincarnation, to never return to this universe. Improving the prison (lovely though that may be) would be a distraction from that mission, don't you think?
"Here’s a thought that I often ponder: how is it that a path claiming 3 God-Realized Souls, at least 2 Self-Realized souls (maybe they have 3 now) plus who knows how many other “highly evolved souls" they are touting on their roster of devotees (that is not an insult to devotees)… but how is it that a path with that much supposed “spiritual realization of God’s Essence” flowing through the organization serves so very few souls, a little over one thousand followers. That just doesn’t make much sense, logically or spiritually."
Given how many restrictions are placed on converting new members, this doesn't surprise me. If a path can't have children as devotees, psychic practices aren't allowed, proselytizing is discouraged, there are restrictions on posting flyers, there's little advertisement, there's a mandatory 2 year investigation, no hard-core addicts are supposed to join, you don't have an ashram or commune or any churches, there is little socializing among the membership, the guru sometimes recommends people leave or try other paths instead, etc.- all of this puts quite a crimp on the membership numbers.
Anyway, most of the teachers you previously cited did not have all that many students in their own era. The paths generally became large after the founder died. And who knows how many great teachers had paths which ultimately died out, or were never popular in their own lifetime.
"1. Again, Ben, I’m not sure where you “get your information” but Gary did not drive a Honda in 2000."
Hm, perhaps I was pointed to the wrong car. Or perhaps it was a rental. I suppose if you'd care to share what you knew, you could.
For what it's worth, a few days ago I was listening to a tape from 2008 a few days ago, where Sri Gary said he's been driving the same car for the past "10 or 11 years". So whatever it was, it sounds like he's put some miles in on it. Realistically, though, how he spends his money is not something I'm worried about. It looks like Allan and others established roughly what he and Joy earn, and how they spend it is their business, not mine.
Regarding the issue of air travel, I also recently heard Sri Gary on another tape from 2008 saying he bought tickets from two airlines, just to make sure he made it to the seminar on time. This would suggest to me he probably still travels commercially, at least some of the time.
"3.Well, this response certainly clears up the inaccuracy of the numbers you listed. I guess you answer the question I posed to Allan: you aren’t too concerned with providing factual information, and yet, you are here to “clear up inaccuracies and false impressions.”"
I listed that number as an approximate guess. I wish I could have given a precise number, but I couldn't, so I shared my best guess. I felt it was a reasonable conjecture based on the number of students attending physically, and the fact that many chelas attend online or on the phone lines, and the fact there are chelas overseas.
As long as it is appropriate to do so, I'll share as much accurate information as I can. Though, in general I'm not too keen to get into the personal lives of Sri Gary and others, because I think they deserve some privacy, too. Only if they were abusing someone else- from their own actions, not by what their students decide to do on their own- in a really obvious way, would I think their private lives were important and worth talking about publicly.
Also, all the stuff about outer details, at least when it comes to my experience of MasterPath, misses the whole point of what MasterPath intends to be about. The focus of MasterPath has overwhelmingly been on the student's inner experience. If MasterPath was a very outer-focused path, it would make more sense to me to fixate on those details. But that's just not the role I've been asked by Sri Gary to give it in my life, nor what I've seen in the lives of chelas I know reasonably well. As Dennis said, "He got me there", and that's the part that matters to me.
I understand if you and others want to focus on the outer details- cars, plane rides, etc.; particularly when in your case you have a great deal more outer experiences to go on. But, just to be honest, it won't have much sway with me. Of course you don't participate here just for my benefit, so please carry on- I just don't want you to be disappointed if I'm nonplussed by a lot of what you have to say. It doesn't mean I think it's not an important experience- for you, and for those who think it matters- but it's not crucially important to me.
As for why I've so far mostly focused on the outer details- outer details are often the only absolute facts one can discuss. I almost never think about the outer details, and it means little to me. But if I went in the other direction, talking mostly about all the utterly unique feelings, insights, dreams, experiences, etc., that I've had with MasterPath (and which I have not been able to replicate from other sources, including my own best efforts)- well, what I said about that could easily be disputed as too subjective, abstract, or it would be something others couldn't relate to.
deepcynic:
"Tithing is voluntary, not a prerequisite of participation."
Participation in MasterPath is voluntary. And Sri Gary has recommended other Light and Sound paths for those for whom MasterPath is not a good fit. It is my understanding that those paths don't require dues, though they have what I would consider to be more onerous requirements in other areas of one's life.
By the way, I really appreciate the forthrightness of your nickname. Thank you.
allan1015:
"I tend to think the truth is so big, that things that look contradictory are in fact not - when you shift to the proper/larger perspective. None of them are completely false, all have some truth."
Very well said
. We've all got our piece of the elephant, as the Sikh story goes
.
After all this serious discussion, I have a humorous story to share, on the topic of "strong points of view".
In 2004 I was having tea in the professor's lounge of Trinity College at the University of Cambridge. I was with a maths professor (my friend), and a professor of biology. Both of them were atheists. Then we were joined by Dr. Brian Josephson, who won the Nobel Prize in physics a while back. After Dr. Josephson left, I was expressing my admiration for his achievements. And the biologist said, "Yes. But it's quite a shame. He's gone quite barmy since then.". I asked him what he meant, and he said, "Well, you know, he's started researching all that New Age nonsense".
I was quite impressed by this experience. If a Nobel Prize winner could be called barmy, by a colleague no less, while he was doing research which was in his own field of expertise- well, nobody's safe from judgment, from any direction. I think we would benefit by accepting the fact that some people will be skeptical (or believers) and name-callers, even if "they ought to know better".