Where do the hot girls live in the Bay Area ?? (San Jose: 2013, move to)

[Dave Coe]

Originally Posted by jessemh431

Sorry we like to look good and wear nice clothes and drive nice cars? What's so bad about liking nice things? The Bay could learn a thing or two from LA in that category. There's a reason why this thread exists in the SF Subforum, and not the LA one.

But the LA fasion sense is not classy in the sense of London, Paris, or Milan. LA is full of lots of trashy douchy wannabe reality TV types with tatoos. LA is not epitamy of class.

[WizardOfRadical]

LoL, the US based company that comes up with rankings has LA at 4, behind NYC, Paris, and London. Like most bay areans, you probably know nothing of that industry but probably think you are an expert. Oh, and no bay city has ever been considered a high fashion city. People wear north face in the bay, lol. For a region so affluent and educated, you would think people know how to dress. But, I digress.

Oh and the hot bay natives are in LA, if you haven't yet figured out.

[Bonez765]

Originally Posted by WizardOfRadical

LoL, the US based company that comes up with rankings has LA at 4, behind NYC, Paris, and London. Like most bay areans, you probably know nothing of that industry but probably think you are an expert. Oh, and no bay city has ever been considered a high fashion city. People wear north face in the bay, lol. For a region so affluent and educated, you would think people know how to dress. But, I digress.

Oh and the hot bay natives are in LA, if you haven't yet figured out.

The last sentence is very true. Lots of attractive girls who I went to school with moved down to LA or San Diego. The only incoming girls we get in the Bay are loads of fob Asian girls (I don't like Asian girls; too many cultural differences and they don't turn me on) and loads of weird transplants.

[Dave Coe]

Originally Posted by Bonez765

The last sentence is very true. Lots of attractive girls who I went to school with moved down to LA or San Diego. The only incoming girls we get in the Bay are loads of fob Asian girls (I don't like Asian girls; too many cultural differences and they don't turn me on) and loads of weird transplants.

Are you talking about girls who grew up in SF or in the suburbs?

[Bonez765]

Originally Posted by Dave Coe

Are you talking about girls who grew up in SF or in the suburbs?

The Suburbs. I grew up in the suburbs.

[Dave Coe]

Originally Posted by Bonez765

The Suburbs. I grew up in the suburbs.

I grew up in LA. My observations is that most of the attractive women in their 20s move there from other places but they usually don't growv up there unless they have rich parents. Attractive girls tend to grow up in suburban areas but leave once they go off to college.

[Bonez765]

Originally Posted by Dave Coe

I grew up in LA. My observations is that most of the attractive women in their 20s move there from other places but they usually don't growv up there unless they have rich parents. Attractive girls tend to grow up in suburban areas but leave once they go off to college.

It depends on the suburbs. My suburban town didn't have too many attractive girls,while my next door neighbor city, Napa, had lots when I was in high school (I graduated high school in 2012). But anyway, most of the attractive girls I know left to SoCal, out of state, or to Chico. Very few stayed in the Bay and if they did, they were usually in a serious relationship. Now, there are still some attractive girls in the Bay but they are usually older than me and I'm not of moneyed status. So I'm left with little choices and it's one of the reasons why I'm leaving California in Spring, 2016.


To all the heterosexual men here.

http://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-49071.html

[jessemh431]

Growing up in the city argument is a little different for LA because the city limits are so vast. I knew plenty of attractive men and women from the city of LA. Woodland Hills, Encino, Tarzana, Sherman Oaks, Pacific Palisades, Westwood, Brentwood, and even slightly Westchester. Others would be Santa Monica, Manhattan Beach, and Torrance. But I get that SF is different because of the small city limits.

NYC is another good example, though, because I know plenty of attractive people from the further out parts of Brooklyn and Queens.

San Diego is a whole different story too. La Jolla, Point Loma, Carmel, Rancho Bernardo.

In SF, the kids only exist in the Richmond and Sunset mainly. And the majority of those are 1st generation or immigrants themselves and usually still Asian which we've settled isn't the mainstream view of "beauty" in this country.

[Dave Coe]

Originally Posted by jessemh431

Growing up in the city argument is a little different for LA because the city limits are so vast. I knew plenty of attractive men and women from the city of LA. Woodland Hills, Encino, Tarzana, Sherman Oaks, Pacific Palisades, Westwood, Brentwood, and even slightly Westchester. Others would be Santa Monica, Manhattan Beach, and Torrance. But I get that SF is different because of the small city limits.

NYC is another good example, though, because I know plenty of attractive people from the further out parts of Brooklyn and Queens.

San Diego is a whole different story too. La Jolla, Point Loma, Carmel, Rancho Bernardo.

In SF, the kids only exist in the Richmond and Sunset mainly. And the majority of those are 1st generation or immigrants themselves and usually still Asian which we've settled isn't the mainstream view of "beauty" in this country.

LA is largely immigration as well and the San Fernando Valley despite being in LA city is an older inner ring suburb comparable to the Santa Clara Valley. SF city is the equivalent on the area from Santa Monica to Downtown.

[Dave Coe]

I think the reasons they move to Social is the nightlife and beaches and weather but that's overrated. SF has decent nightlife but is more sophisticated and less Douchy than Hollywood and Orange County. Southern CAs beaches can be very cold in the summer. That's true of most of the beaches in CA.