Survivor #31 Fall 2015 (Lost, show, character, friends)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I as well, like Joe, but if there is a chance to get him out, you get him out. Fishbeck can go at any time down the road, he's not going to win an immunity. Fishbeck shot himself in the foot though.
I agree. If I were playing, with my brain rather than my emotions, I'd be torpedoing Joe while the opportunity presented itself. Fishbach seriously did a naughty to the dog with his special power.
They were foolish not to target Joe. It may have been their only opportunity to rid themselves of the super physical player.
Although I liked watching Jeremy's play of the hidden immunity idol (who knew that was comin?), I think it was unwise. It's like showing your hand in a high stakes poker game.
That Spencer is a sly dog. There's just something about him that gives me chills. I think he's a sick guy. I would avoid him in real life. He may win this thing, but it won't change who he is.
Yeah, if they had been smarter, they'd have shot Joe while he appeared in their sight picture. The guy is like Ozzy, who was basically an otter in the water, an ourangoutang in the woods, and an Olympian over plain ground.
I understand Spencer and why he's not a sick guy. He doesn't get all the social cues that average people get. To his credit, he seeks to elevate his ability to fit in. No, you should be glad for Spencer. I know people with Spencer's wiring who do not seek to fit in, and who simply do not feel what most people feel. Those that would not bother to try, they should scare you. Those like Spencer, who bother, you're fine. Believe me.
What would the vote have been if Fishbach had voted twice for Joe?
I didn't like his smugness and figured he'd be going home when he said he was "in a really good position" or something to that effect.
If Fishback voted for Abi twice, it would have been a tie and revote. I was thinking he should have voted for Joe twice so it was a tough call for Fish.
Thank God they upgraded that shelter. Survivor's getting out of hand starving and freezing the players. Given that it's mainly a social game, you could argue it should take place in a conference room.
What would the vote have been if Fishbach had voted twice for Joe?
I didn't like his smugness and figured he'd be going home when he said he was "in a really good position" or something to that effect.
I think that Joe only had two votes and Fishbach had four, so he would have been voted out even if he would have voted for Joe twice. I hope Kimmi is next.
Had they read up on Cambodia before they got there, they could have built their own split-bamboo waterproof shelter. And I mean water PROOF! Season after season, players go into this game without having done any research. They had it much worse in Africa. In the Outback, instead of complaining, they hunted and fished. They explored their surroundings for edibles. They were so poorly "nutritioned" that their hair was coming out in clumps. In Cambodia they sit crying in a leaking shelter, whining about the rain, not knowing how to help themselves. They should be ashamed that Jeff had to build them a decent shelter. He should have taken ALL of their supplies in return.
Didn't Fishback say he was using Joe's vote to vote for Joe? I thought you were not allowed to vote for yourself.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.