Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-24-2013, 11:52 PM
 
3,834 posts, read 5,759,863 times
Reputation: 2556

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danbo1957 View Post
Try driving in New York City, Washington, D.C., or Boston during rush hour... cities designed for horses. Austin freeway traffic is horrible, but not "kill yourself" horrible. Houston traffic is better than it use to be (except for the Gulf Freeway).
You're right - I lived in NYC and DC and have visited Boston frequently - I would never dream of owning my own car there.

fortunately they all have excellent transit systems where you don't need have one at all. . .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-25-2013, 05:50 AM
 
Location: The People's Republic of Austin
5,184 posts, read 7,276,257 times
Reputation: 2575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Komeht View Post
You're right - I lived in NYC and DC and have visited Boston frequently - I would never dream of owning my own car there.

fortunately they all have excellent transit systems where you don't need have one at all. . .
Seems sort of counterintuitive that a place, like DC, would have an "excellent transit system", yet at the same time, have the worst traffic in the country.

Is that our future? Spend billions on various rail systems, yet not improve congestion one whit?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 07:33 AM
 
3,834 posts, read 5,759,863 times
Reputation: 2556
Quote:
Originally Posted by scm53 View Post
Seems sort of counterintuitive that a place, like DC, would have an "excellent transit system", yet at the same time, have the worst traffic in the country.

Is that our future? Spend billions on various rail systems, yet not improve congestion one whit?
Traffic is here to stay - that's the consequence of 5 decades of building a car based city on a dendritic road system that was spread out from Kyle to Georgetown with very few options on which traffic may go.

Transit provides options. It won't solve congestion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 08:29 AM
 
Location: The People's Republic of Austin
5,184 posts, read 7,276,257 times
Reputation: 2575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Komeht View Post
Traffic is here to stay - that's the consequence of 5 decades of building a car based city on a dendritic road system that was spread out from Kyle to Georgetown with very few options on which traffic may go.
Or not building the system that was planned five decades ago ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 09:29 AM
 
3,834 posts, read 5,759,863 times
Reputation: 2556
Quote:
Originally Posted by scm53 View Post
Oh yeah, because slicing the city up with expressways along town lake, in between the Capitol and UT, etc. would have made Austin a really special place. . .

JFC - honestly - it's really unbelievable that we can identify easily the most horrid places to live in America - Phoenix, Houston, Atlanta, etc. and proclaim "thank god we're not them" and then advocate the EXACT same recipe for disaster.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 09:41 AM
 
Location: The People's Republic of Austin
5,184 posts, read 7,276,257 times
Reputation: 2575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Komeht View Post
Oh yeah, because slicing the city up with expressways along town lake, in between the Capitol and UT, etc. would have made Austin a really special place. . .
The fact that it wasn't what YOU would have chosen doesn't make it wrong. The bigger fact is that it was the only plan that existed, it was blocked, and nothing else was done - in this ridiculous notion of "if we don't build it, they won't come."

What we have is planning in the absence - failure to decide is a decision all by itself. To blame "5 decades of building a car based city on a dendritic road system" only addresses the end of the system. The fact that roads don't connect has nothing to do with the congestion caused by our lack of arterial capacity to meet the demand. You could have every street in the Austin metro on a grid, and still have the congestion today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 09:47 AM
 
Location: Avery Ranch, Austin, TX
8,977 posts, read 17,545,822 times
Reputation: 4001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Komeht View Post
JFC - honestly - it's really unbelievable that we can identify easily the most horrid places to live in America - Phoenix, Houston, Atlanta, etc. and proclaim "thank god we're not them" and then advocate the EXACT same recipe for disaster.
Really? Do you think 5 million people are being held against their will? Yeah, traffic is bad; but that's hardly the most important factor in determining the quality of life in a major city. I wouldn't have spent 25 years there if it were "horrid"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 09:49 AM
 
3,834 posts, read 5,759,863 times
Reputation: 2556
Quote:
Originally Posted by scm53 View Post
The fact that it wasn't what YOU would have chosen doesn't make it wrong. The bigger fact is that it was the only plan that existed, it was blocked, and nothing else was done - in this ridiculous notion of "if we don't build it, they won't come."

What we have is planning in the absence - failure to decide is a decision all by itself. To blame "5 decades of building a car based city on a dendritic road system" implies such a system was built. It wasn't, so you are blaming something that exists only in its absence.
It is a myth that we didn't build roads in Austin. I don't know where you get this stuff. In my lifetime the upper deck on IH 35 did not exist. Mopac was a surface road. 183 was a two lane country road, Ben White Boulevard was, in fact, a surface boulevard, etc. etc. etc. We have built, widened, widened again, and again and again, road after road after road and it gets worse and worse and worse.

You know how many years TxDOT got out of grade separating IH 35 from East Avenue before they had to build the upper decks? 4 years. That's it. That's about the life you get out of a new road before you reach capacity.

And in the meantime all this stuff gets more and more expensive to maintain - which is why the DOTs and the federal highway fund are now broke.

We have been on a road building spree for the last 50 years and it hasn't worked. Time to to try something different.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 09:56 AM
 
Location: The People's Republic of Austin
5,184 posts, read 7,276,257 times
Reputation: 2575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Komeht View Post
It is a myth that we didn't build roads in Austin. I don't know where you get this stuff. In my lifetime the upper deck on IH 35 did not exist. Mopac was a surface road. 183 was a two lane country road, Ben White Boulevard was, in fact, a surface boulevard, etc. etc. etc. We have built, widened, widened again, and again and again, road after road after road and it gets worse and worse and worse.
Nice straw man. By your own admission, we didn't execute the 1962 plan. And all of the gorilla dust you are throwing up fails to point out the obvious - that construction has, purposely, failed to jeep pace with the growth. Just the city - disregard the metro area - has grown 6X in your five decade span. Have our roads grown 6X?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 10:03 AM
 
269 posts, read 428,200 times
Reputation: 272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Komeht View Post
Oh yeah, because slicing the city up with expressways along town lake, in between the Capitol and UT, etc. would have made Austin a really special place. . .

JFC - honestly - it's really unbelievable that we can identify easily the most horrid places to live in America - Phoenix, Houston, Atlanta, etc. and proclaim "thank god we're not them" and then advocate the EXACT same recipe for disaster.
Who is this we? that you are talking about? Certainly not me, as I love Houston and don't mind Atlanta. I thank God that I don't live in places like DC, Chicago and NY.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top