Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-14-2007, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Oak Park, IL
404 posts, read 711,512 times
Reputation: 51

Advertisements

Sorry to bring this up again, the read was nicely buried on the 2nd page, but I just got off the phone with my lawyer. I have a meeting with him on Friday, and the arbitration hearing if set for Monday. He says that the case has gone as smoothly as any case can go. The defendants have been cooperative, and the judge isn't passing unreasonable decisions.

This doesn;t change they way I feel about Chicago. It's not a place I can give many positive comments about.

Have a great day!

William

 
Old 08-30-2007, 06:19 PM
 
2 posts, read 12,647 times
Reputation: 10
Default i know a place!

i know a place on the southwest side of chicago that may be right for you. evergreen park, 30 minutes away from steger on sidestreets! it has 0% crime, and the average price for a medium size home is 95,000 dollars!
e.v.p.k is an awesome, cheap, safe place to live. you should check it out!
 
Old 08-30-2007, 06:23 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,185,348 times
Reputation: 29983
95 grand the "average price" for a medium-sized home in Evergreen Park? In 1994 maybe. Not in 2007. Realtor.com currently lists 177 single-family houses for sale in Evergreen Park. Of those 177, exactly ZERO of them are priced below 100 grand. The cheapest house listed is $114,000, and it looks like it's barely standing. The next cheapest is a 2-bed, 1-bath at $150K. Not exactly a "medium-sized" house.
 
Old 08-30-2007, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Honolulu
86 posts, read 698,375 times
Reputation: 54
I left Chicago nearly twenty years ago, probably a few years before violent crime nearly peeked. I was quite bitter when I left and just assumed it's still the same dump I left two decades ago, but many posters here have told me otherwise. To think Cabrini Green has become home to mixed-income families is terrific, so are the incredible improvements in Logan Square, Wicker Park and the Near West Side.

Now if they (don't exactly know who) can just do the same in the communities of Austin, West and East Garfield Park, Humboldt Park, North Lawndale, All of Englewood (including West), Greater Grand Crossing, South Shore, Woodlawn, Rosedale, Chatham, Washington Heights, Grand Boulevard and Rogers Park specifically NOH. Anyone know if any of these areas are "truly up and coming" or is all this talk I'm hearing a bunch smoke and mirrors?
 
Old 08-31-2007, 06:28 PM
 
358 posts, read 1,916,481 times
Reputation: 175
For a neighborhood to be "up and coming", the people who already live there basically gotta go. Where are all those people going to go?
 
Old 08-31-2007, 06:34 PM
 
Location: Oak Park, IL
5,525 posts, read 13,950,687 times
Reputation: 3908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milliano View Post
For a neighborhood to be "up and coming", the people who already live there basically gotta go. Where are all those people going to go?
Not necessarily true.

A lot of these so-called up and coming neighborhoods have already been depopulated compared to their historic peaks. Drive through Lawndale or Woodlawn and you'll see block after block of empty lots which used to hold apartments and SFH. There's still plenty of vacant land in Chicago to build on without displacing the current residents.
 
Old 08-31-2007, 06:59 PM
 
Location: Ireland......
13 posts, read 52,456 times
Reputation: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathead View Post
14. Someone once told me every a--hole in the midwest moves to Chicago. It's true.

15. It's philosophy of maternalism in govt. Ban smoking, ban cell phone use in cars, ban, ban, ban...
Ive never been to a more friendlier place...did not meet one rude,nasty, ignorant or in any way not-nice person during my time there! I was actually shocked at how nice people were !!

smoking ban is coming in all over the place...came to ireland already,and now its weird going to countries that dont have it..its just the norm...

and cell phone use in cars?? that makes a lot of sence to me!!!
 
Old 08-31-2007, 08:16 PM
 
173 posts, read 591,771 times
Reputation: 94
Well the truth about Chicago is that its insanely expensive (the cost of living here is almost the highest in the country!!), the people are hostile towards everyone , the crime is unbelievable, and the weather sucks. The traffic is a nightmare, congestion is unavoidable, and to top it all off, the entire area is just totally visually unappealing. Its hideous. Theres a few nice looking spots downtown.Its not worth it.
 
Old 08-31-2007, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Phoenix metro
20,004 posts, read 77,384,761 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by sundance67 View Post
Well the truth about Chicago is that its insanely expensive (the cost of living here is almost the highest in the country!!), the people are hostile towards everyone , the crime is unbelievable, and the weather sucks. The traffic is a nightmare, congestion is unavoidable, and to top it all off, the entire area is just totally visually unappealing. Its hideous. Theres a few nice looking spots downtown.Its not worth it.
Um, I can think of a bunch of cities that are alot smaller than Chicago and are alot more expensive.
 
Old 08-31-2007, 09:42 PM
 
7,331 posts, read 15,386,950 times
Reputation: 3800
Meh. I dunno why I bother reading this thread. I'm sorry you feel that way, sundance. Maybe you would be more comfortable in... hell, I dunno. Palm Springs?

Chicago is lower on this list, CNN Money's top 50 most expensive places to live, than most major US cities. It's below NYC, the Bay Area, LA, Honolulu, San Diego, DC, Boston, and any city in Alaska.

In addition, we have art, culture, world class universities, a true cosmopolitan feel, real people, a non-disney feel (Oh no! Panhandlers! Just say no, kids.), great food (considered by many to be the best restaurant city in the country these days), public transportation (even if it sucks sometimes, try not having it at all!), great music, and load of other stuff that most US cities just can't claim.

There are other cool places out there! Don't get me wrong. I LOVE that our city is nasty in spots. I LOVE that we are a little rough around the edges. I love the beautiful neighborhoods. (Come have a beer with me in the front window of Huettenbar and tell me this city is ugly outside of downtown. I dare you.). I just want to know.... if this place is SO BAD, where's better? Where else has solved all the problems we struggle with while retaining the same character and culture that Chicago enjoys?

Bonus points if that city is more than 75 years old.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top