Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I know. It kills people to give credit to Houston or any Southern or sunbelt city for anything. It must never be at the level or even try to one up an older city in it's wildest dreams. Why sunbelt or southern cities are even mentioned in city vs city forums is beyond me.
Spade, what kills me is that people from Southern or sunbelt cities run down other Southern or sunbelt cities.
Ok, so you think if we could somehow conduct a scientific study on which city is preferable, Houton or Philadelphia, Houston would somehow do better than it's done in this poll? lol.... that's delusional. It's Philadelphia, period. Putting these two in a head to head match up is ridiculous.
And, by the way, and again, I'm not slamming Houston. I am well aware of the advantages of living in a up-and-coming metro with a low cost of living since I live in one myself. I think Houston embarrasses itself though by acting like it can compete with the older, established cities .. or that it somehow exists in a "big four" because it just so happens to have incorporated a freaking county's worth of territory.
But It does exist in the big four, because it's right up there with the big four. Houston didn't just become the 4th largest city overnight, nor has it been arbitrarily assigned such. Since so many people here are caught up in numbers and scientific elements, why can't they deal with the reality that the CENSUS has verified that Houston is the 4th largest.
It does seem that people (on here at least) have a problem with Houston's status and population. This city is not 'acting like it can compete with older cities'. It can compete. The mere fact that something like this thread/poll is ever present, in attempt to discredit the city is evidence of that.
The problem is people keep trying to make Houston NYC South or Philly South. No, it does not have the old architecture. If people want that, then they should go to or move to those older, established cities, and stop bashing Houston for something it's not, and then bashing it , because your under the assumption (or want to believe) it's trying to be something it's not. You all can't have it both ways.
As far as this online poll, it's hardly scientific. Most here would vote for Philly simply out of spite for Houston. Nothing scientific about that at all.
But It does exist in the big four, because it's right up there with the big four. Houston didn't just become the 4th largest city overnight, nor has it been arbitrarily assigned such. Since so many people here are caught up in numbers and scientific elements, why can't they deal with the reality that the CENSUS has verified that Houston is the 4th largest.
It does seem that people (on here at least) have a problem with Houston's status and population. This city is not 'acting like it can compete with older cities'. It can compete. The mere fact that something like this thread/poll is ever present, in attempt to discredit the city is evidence of that.
The problem is people keep trying to make Houston NYC South or Philly South. No, it does not have the old architecture. If people want that, then they should go to or move to those older, established cities, and stop bashing Houston for something it's not, and then bashing it , because your under the assumption (or want to believe) it's trying to be something it's not. You all can't have it both ways.
As far as this online poll, it's hardly scientific. Most here would vote for Philly simply out of spite for Houston. Nothing scientific about that at all.
Preach it Sister.
The envious die not once, but as oft as the envied win applause. ~Baltasar Gracian
everytime some says something good about Houston, you can see the haters dying inside
But It does exist in the big four, because it's right up there with the big four. Houston didn't just become the 4th largest city overnight, nor has it been arbitrarily assigned such.
With help from its massive annexation of land, so it kind of did happen overnight.
Quote:
Since so many people here are caught up in numbers and scientific elements, why can't they deal with the reality that the CENSUS has verified that Houston is the 4th largest.
Because census numbers can be misleading when comparing certain cites. As for dealing with reality, the reality is that Philly is actually a more populated area than Houston.
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,047,835 times
Reputation: 11862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Palm
But It does exist in the big four, because it's right up there with the big four. Houston didn't just become the 4th largest city overnight, nor has it been arbitrarily assigned such. Since so many people here are caught up in numbers and scientific elements, why can't they deal with the reality that the CENSUS has verified that Houston is the 4th largest.
It does seem that people (on here at least) have a problem with Houston's status and population. This city is not 'acting like it can compete with older cities'. It can compete. The mere fact that something like this thread/poll is ever present, in attempt to discredit the city is evidence of that.
The problem is people keep trying to make Houston NYC South or Philly South. No, it does not have the old architecture. If people want that, then they should go to or move to those older, established cities, and stop bashing Houston for something it's not, and then bashing it , because your under the assumption (or want to believe) it's trying to be something it's not. You all can't have it both ways.
As far as this online poll, it's hardly scientific. Most here would vote for Philly simply out of spite for Houston. Nothing scientific about that at all.
Spite for Houston? lol. People just don't care for it, and are sick of constantly hearing about it. It's a mass of low density sprawl that can be found in hundreds of other cities in the nation. If Houston dropped off the face of the earth no one would miss it. For every Philly there are at least 30 Houstons. Actually no Philly is truly unique, as is Boston, SF, NOLA etc. So what if people go there cos it's warm and cheap, there are cities with 10 million in China nobody's ever heard of. Having more people does not make a city better at all.
Spite for Houston? lol. People just don't care for it, and are sick of constantly hearing about it. It's a mass of low density sprawl that can be found in hundreds of other cities in the nation. If Houston dropped off the face of the earth no one would miss it. For every Philly there are at least 30 Houstons. Actually no Philly is truly unique, as is Boston, SF, NOLA etc. So what if people go there cos it's warm and cheap, there are cities with 10 million in China nobody's ever heard of. Having more people does not make a city better at all.
So in essence, you already had your mind made up about the place. So why make the thread? To have an agenda? Ridiculous. It would be best for to just go to these unique cities. Btw, name me 30 Houstons.
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,047,835 times
Reputation: 11862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade
So in essence, you already had your mind made up about the place. So why make the thread? To have an agenda? Ridiculous.
Some people act like since Houston has surpassed Philadelphia in population it's somehow superior. They act like any city in the Northeast that isn't NYC or DC is crumbling and filled with crime, just because it recorded population loss for decades in the 20th century.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.