U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Best food city after NYC?
Los Angeles 46 22.44%
Chicago 53 25.85%
Washington DC 5 2.44%
San Francisco/Bay Area 26 12.68%
Dallas-Fort Worth 5 2.44%
Philadelphia 25 12.20%
Houston 18 8.78%
Atlanta 6 2.93%
Miami 7 3.41%
Boston 4 1.95%
Other 10 4.88%
Voters: 205. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-16-2012, 02:09 PM
 
637 posts, read 745,618 times
Reputation: 256

Advertisements

Since NYC is the unquestionable #1 food city in the United States, I was wondering what would be the best out of the next group of major cities considered to have the best food options?

Criteria:

Higher End?
Mid Range?
Lower End?
Ethnic Foods?
Distinct Local Cuisine?
Ingredients?
Anything else?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-16-2012, 02:14 PM
 
Location: The City
21,957 posts, read 30,833,628 times
Reputation: 7489
Is either Chicago or SF IMHO; personally would be hard pressed to argue against either

Gladly food at many levels has increased in many cities and places like LA, Philly, Houston etc. all offer exceptional quality and diverse selections at many levels as well.

So many great cities in the US to eat...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 02:16 PM
 
Location: In the heights
20,167 posts, read 21,767,856 times
Reputation: 10249
New Orleans should get at least an honorary mention.

Also, answer's probably Los Angeles. More so if you somehow lumped Las Vegas into it (which is basically a playground for Los Angeles).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,702 posts, read 11,355,585 times
Reputation: 3539
IMO this is a battle between San Fran, Chicago and Philly
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 02:19 PM
 
Location: The City
21,957 posts, read 30,833,628 times
Reputation: 7489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summersm343 View Post
IMO this is a battle between San Fran, Chicago and Philly

As much as the food scene has propelled in Philly; Chicago and SF are ahead of Philly in this regard; LA probably as well overall
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 02:22 PM
 
637 posts, read 745,618 times
Reputation: 256
I actually can't see how someone can reasonably choose SF over LA, considering the natural advantages are just the same, except LA is way more populated and has more of everything.

Though I'd put Chicago ahead of both of them simply because Chicago has more originality behind its food.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,702 posts, read 11,355,585 times
Reputation: 3539
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
As much as the food scene has propelled in Philly; Chicago and SF are ahead of Philly in this regard; LA probably as well overall
I can agree with this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,087 posts, read 12,577,322 times
Reputation: 3941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summersm343 View Post
IMO this is a battle between San Fran, Chicago and Philly
For fine dining yes.. I think the conversation changes depending on what kind of food city you are looking for.

Personally I cannot afford to go to Michelin Guide restaurants more than once every two years or so. IMO mid-range and low-range restaurants are much more important.

The Bay Area sounds like a good call for second, though the cities you mentioned plus LA are all in the running.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,702 posts, read 11,355,585 times
Reputation: 3539
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
For fine dining yes.. I think the conversation changes depending on what kind of food city you are looking for.

Personally I cannot afford to go to Michelin Guide restaurants more than once every two years or so. IMO mid-range and low-range restaurants are much more important.

The Bay Area sounds like a good call for second, though the cities you mentioned plus LA are all in the running.
Yes, I forgot to add LA. I think LA will be in the running as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 02:29 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,087 posts, read 12,577,322 times
Reputation: 3941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summersm343 View Post
Yes, I forgot to add LA. I think LA will be in the running as well.
If anything for sheer quantity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top