Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city's residential architecture do you prefer?
Minneapolis 11 9.24%
Kansas City 3 2.52%
Chicago 58 48.74%
Milwaukee 7 5.88%
St. Louis 42 35.29%
Indianapolis 6 5.04%
Detroit 14 11.76%
Cincinnati 21 17.65%
Columbus 4 3.36%
Cleveland 12 10.08%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 119. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-06-2012, 09:00 AM
 
Location: Cleveland
4,669 posts, read 4,982,604 times
Reputation: 6028

Advertisements

^That's why Chicago wins this contest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-06-2012, 09:04 AM
 
976 posts, read 2,244,149 times
Reputation: 630
being from philadelphia, st. louis is the most eastern style of the cities in this poll, chicago included. while chicago has examples of greystones, brownstones and some rowhouses, it is generally comprised of prairie-style neighborhoods common in the great lakes region. st. louis, on the other hand, is extremely rich from end to end with dense red brick housing stock. the exceptions are few and far between. it is easy to see that st. louis grew up with the eastern cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2012, 09:08 AM
 
Location: Twilight zone
3,645 posts, read 8,314,617 times
Reputation: 1772
I hear kansas city has some nice architecture but I wouldn't know b/c I've never been there

EDIT: I still say Chicago wins. Also St. Louis and cincinattin have some nice buildings as well so I voted for them also

Last edited by mas23; 07-06-2012 at 09:24 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2012, 09:14 AM
 
Location: alexandria, VA
16,352 posts, read 8,097,884 times
Reputation: 9726
I think the neighborhoods in K.C. are basically single family (detached) homes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2012, 09:25 AM
 
5,347 posts, read 10,164,034 times
Reputation: 2446
Quote:
Originally Posted by tribecavsbrowns View Post
^That's why Chicago wins this contest.
If we are talking row houses, Chicago is not even in consideration. They do have nice homes there but not huge areas of row houses as far as the eye can see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2012, 09:26 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh (via Chicago, via Pittsburgh)
3,887 posts, read 5,522,794 times
Reputation: 3107
if anyone took time to walk around the incredibly dense neighborhoods in Lakeview, Lincoln Park, Wicker Park, Kenwood etc, with their mixture of rowhomes, flats, brown/greystones, victorians, etc..then went to the Gold Cost/River North to view Chicago's amazing highrise living, then went to Oak Park to see the gorgeous Frank Lloyd Wright houses along with the other beautiful/unique homes in Oak Park, Evanston, Winnetka, etc., it's not hard to see that Chicago wins this for sheer variety, quantity and quality. There are certainly other FANTASTIC neighborhoods/residential areas in other Midwestern Metros (STL and Cin come to mind), but they cannot match Chicago's variety and quantity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2012, 09:28 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh (via Chicago, via Pittsburgh)
3,887 posts, read 5,522,794 times
Reputation: 3107
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC's Finest View Post
If we are talking row houses, Chicago is not even in consideration. They do have nice homes there but not huge areas of row houses as far as the eye can see.
WHO CARES....why do threads about RESIDENTAL architecture (that means of ALL sorts) always have to come down to "which city has rowhouses as far as the eye can see" (no matter how ugly or rundown those rowhouses are)... it makes no sense. Chicago HAS rowhouses (beautiful ones), as well as residential options the other cities listed don't even have. Sure rowhouses have their place..but they are not the be all end all when it comes to residential architecture like so many on CD seem to believe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2012, 09:30 AM
 
5,347 posts, read 10,164,034 times
Reputation: 2446
I've seen almost every style of home in Chicago and the perception that I have is that bungalows and flats dominate the entire city. You may find a small amount of streets here or there with row houses but that's not the norm. Some of the bungalows are incredible but they scream suburbia. That's why I picked "The Loo."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2012, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Twilight zone
3,645 posts, read 8,314,617 times
Reputation: 1772
Chicago has no shortage of row houses but they're not as continuous as say Baltimore or Philadelphia. For example you'll have maybe a block of row houses wile the next block is mostly two/three flats.

Or you're have 6 attached 3 flats (which basically resemble row homes) while the rest of the block is mostly detached units. This doesn't mean it's less urbane or anything.

mas23
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2012, 09:33 AM
 
5,347 posts, read 10,164,034 times
Reputation: 2446
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForYourLungsOnly View Post
WHO CARES....why do threads about RESIDENTAL architecture (that means of ALL sorts) always have to come down to "which city has rowhouses as far as the eye can see" (no matter how ugly or rundown those rowhouses are)... it makes no sense. Chicago HAS rowhouses (beautiful ones), as well as residential options the other cities listed don't even have. Sure rowhouses have their place..but they are not the be all end all when it comes to residential architecture like so many on CD seem to believe.
Spend some time in Back Bay in Boston. Or in Philly and then you will definitely see the difference. Nothing comes close to urban residential architecture as a nice row house or brownstone. That's why they cost so much more than bungalows or flats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:08 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top