Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The vote is a cornor stone of democracy. Especially in this day and age where every vote counts. Requireing a legal ID would certainly eliminate many avenues of fraud. The only reason anyone would be against it is fear of a valid election.
How can anyone live today without a valid ID? How do you cash a check? Buy a drink or tobacco products? How do you buy a car? How do you sign up for gov benefits such as welfare or Social Security?
I know quite a few people that if they didn't drive they could function without ID. They don't drink/smoke. They have direct deposit. They buy cars with cash. They don't fly or do anything that requires ID. I myself fit in that catergory. I do need ID so I can sign up SS and Medicare.
i cant believe you are this trusting of politicians. to believe they really care about your vote, and that the republicans are doing this to look out for you and me.
i know you are a republican, but you can't afford to be this passive and blinded by anything your party does.
i think party loyalty is for the weak and is a big reason why the electorate is so dumbed down.
I think that an involved citizenry is important.
My party has nothing to do with it.
The fact is, there have been many issues with voter fraud in certain districts.
I have to wonder how a person would be competent to vote if they are unable to check a box on the form. How tough can it be to check a dang box??? I mean really, you can't check the box on the card but you know how to vote????? Give me a break!
If the check box said "free food" they would see it.
No the shame the voter fraud so often associated with the Democrat party. It is part of the party history. Claim the truth and be proud.
If there were verified cases of voter fraud, as you seem to suggest, then there would have been a recount of the votes. If a democrat still won an election after the recount, then that democrat obviously received more votes than their opponent.
That negates your previous post, stating that a democrat can only win an election through voter fraud.
If there were verified cases of voter fraud, as you seem to suggest, then there would have been a recount of the votes. If a democrat still won an election after the recount, then that democrat obviously received more votes than their opponent.
That negates your previous post, stating that a democrat can only win an election through voter fraud.
Shame on you for your blatant lies.
There are verified cases, and convictions. They are easy to find.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
