Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-02-2012, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,875 posts, read 26,532,311 times
Reputation: 25777

Advertisements

Yesterday, Mitt made the following statement:

"I'm not concerned about the very poor," Romney said. "There's a safety net there, and if it needs repair I'll fix it. I'm not concerned about the very rich, they're doing just fine. I'm concerned about the heart of America, the 95% of Americans who are right now struggling."

Romney says ‘poor’ comment needs context – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs

Romney expressed a valid point...we have a great many safety nets for the very poor...Medicaid, Section 8, Food Stamps, School Lunch program, WIC, etc, etc. He addresses the issue that many, including many here, express concern over. Specifically the vast majority of people that work for a living and are squeezed by expenses, ect, who make too much to get something from the government.

Yet many in the media and on the left (and the less bright of his GOP competition) seize on the "not concerned about the very poor" comment and take it out of context. How weak-minded are these people? Are they unable to comprehend anything beyond one sentence sound bites? Are they unable to comprehend a simple sentence and context?

This has been on NPR for the last two days, as well as other media sources. Get a frickin' life and learn to read, people, you look like idiots.

BTW, I'm NOT a Romney supporter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-02-2012, 11:36 AM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,498,655 times
Reputation: 3510
You're a day late. It's discussed thoroughly, already. Check for prior discussion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 11:36 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,138,171 times
Reputation: 9409
Every Liberal on this forum should stand up and admit this whole ruckus is promulgated by a Leftist Media that insists on taking Mitt Romney's words out of context.

The question is: Will they decry this type of journalism? Or will they remain mum?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 11:38 AM
 
9,727 posts, read 9,734,634 times
Reputation: 6407
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Every Liberal on this forum should stand up and admit this whole ruckus is promulgated by a Leftist Media that insists on taking Mitt Romney's words out of context.

The question is: Will they decry this type of journalism? Or will they remain mum?


Instead the media will "cover" for Obama when he says "my muslim faith" by correcting him during the interview.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 11:38 AM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,201,005 times
Reputation: 4027
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
Yesterday, Mitt made the following statement:

"I'm not concerned about the very poor," Romney said. "There's a safety net there, and if it needs repair I'll fix it.<snip>
So Romney would fix the net instead of freeing the occupant, would you like to live in a net?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 11:45 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
12,755 posts, read 9,654,477 times
Reputation: 13169
Quote:
Originally Posted by meson View Post
So Romney would fix the net instead of freeing the occupant, would you like to live in a net?
Exactly!

This was my first thought upon hearing his statement...so, you don't want to help the poor better themselves? You think the poor are happy being poor?

Romney wouldn't know poor if he tripped over it, he is so far removed...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 11:47 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,461,752 times
Reputation: 4243
I see the Lefties just moved the goal posts on this thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 11:50 AM
 
6,902 posts, read 7,541,631 times
Reputation: 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
Yesterday, Mitt made the following statement:

"I'm not concerned about the very poor," Romney said. "There's a safety net there, and if it needs repair I'll fix it. I'm not concerned about the very rich, they're doing just fine. I'm concerned about the heart of America, the 95% of Americans who are right now struggling."

Romney says ‘poor’ comment needs context – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs

Romney expressed a valid point...we have a great many safety nets for the very poor...Medicaid, Section 8, Food Stamps, School Lunch program, WIC, etc, etc. He addresses the issue that many, including many here, express concern over. Specifically the vast majority of people that work for a living and are squeezed by expenses, ect, who make too much to get something from the government.

Yet many in the media and on the left (and the less bright of his GOP competition) seize on the "not concerned about the very poor" comment and take it out of context. How weak-minded are these people? Are they unable to comprehend anything beyond one sentence sound bites? Are they unable to comprehend a simple sentence and context?

This has been on NPR for the last two days, as well as other media sources. Get a frickin' life and learn to read, people, you look like idiots.

BTW, I'm NOT a Romney supporter.
Now that your stepped down from your bad liberal soap box. Maybe you should have taken a look at not only NPR, but other news channels and talk radio. Not only the Liberals tore the statement apart, but also Republicans. It was a stupid comment to make no matter what. As far as taking out ot context, it runs both ways when a the President or any other Democrat make a comment that the Republicans pounce on out of context.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 11:51 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,716,244 times
Reputation: 14818
If Romney had said "I am not concerned about the very poor..." his statement would not have dropped like a ton of bricks.

He plainly said that he does "not care about the very poor..." and while I did understand the point he was trying to make, to call people names for hearing what they did in fact hear is, well, stupid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 11:51 AM
 
24,423 posts, read 23,084,509 times
Reputation: 15030
If you want to fix the economy and the country you start with the middle class. You aim jobs at them, you aim tax breaks at them, you aim social programs to fix any problems they have. So Mitt is right in that regard. If the middle class have money, it filters back up to the rich. It filters down to the poor. The middle class are the backbone of the country and the economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top