Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-20-2016, 07:49 AM
 
Location: Chicago
5,559 posts, read 4,631,471 times
Reputation: 2202

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeyJude514 View Post
This is true for anyone who values shallowness over substance. Melania is the very definition of the former; a porn star whose only accomplishment in life is that she managed to snag a rich old womanizer. She is the perfect front for the Trump cult. There's no "there" there.

Michelle, on the other hand, is an intelligent and accomplished woman in her own right. You know, the kind of woman that scares the crap out of old white men and shallow, moronic Trump cultists.

These two woman perfectly epitomize the difference between the two parties. I'll choose substance every time.
Indeed they do, but you don't give Michelle enough credit. After all she did latch on to an up and coming political hack for the totally corrupt and polluted Chicago Democratic Machine. And while the Trumps steal 10s of millions to feed their lifestyle, the Democratic steal $trillions to promote their Parasitical lifestyle in D.C. Clinton got paid off with $153 million from Wall Street. Michelle will do much better.

 
Old 07-20-2016, 07:52 AM
 
4,800 posts, read 3,511,121 times
Reputation: 2301
So Melanie is/was a porn star. So shallow and desparate
 
Old 07-20-2016, 07:55 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,541,024 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kamms View Post
Yet the Princeton/Harvard graduate stated that, if she could be anyone else besides herself, she opted for high school dropout Beyoncé. Despite her Ivy League roots, Michelle Obama is also rooted in Chicago's notorious cronyism.

Yet the Ivy League graduate left a top firm for a Chicago crony job and her and Barack, Barack when he became black having moved on from white Barry, claim to push for black leadership in corporate America and complain about how law firms are dominated by whites, mostly males.

Btw, the Ivy League graduate will be on Karaoke Carpool tonight imitating her idol, Beyoncé.

If Melania Trump were a gold digger, she had the kid, she would have divorced Trump by now and taken her settlement.
What settlement? Have you heard of a Prenup?
 
Old 07-20-2016, 07:56 AM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,301,017 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by twins4lynn View Post
Last night, after Melania gave her speech a panel of news persons on CNN commented on it, and reference was made that Melania’s speech wasn’t nearly as good as Michelle Obama’s and that it lacked substance (and that she should have talked about this or that...). LOL that it’s the same (or very very similar) speech. Even if Melania’s speech was verbatim of Michelle’s, they would complain about the speech content. I'm sure if you go back in history and read all first lady speeches, there will be a lot of repeated words from prior first ladies. Geez, Obama used the same words during his 2008 presidential announcement as John Edwards did in 2004. Didn’t hear any complaints about that.
please stop it, there are plenty of websites that you can use to check for plagiarism put the text of her speech in any one of them and it will come back as plagiarized and I don't blame her. But for crap's sake think about the kind of President Trump would be, this is such a careless lazy campaign that she was allowed on stage with this speech? Who is running this campaign it seems that there is no fact checking, no vetting of speeches, no coordination - it is scary to think that this guy could run the US, a job which leaves little room for error.
 
Old 07-20-2016, 08:01 AM
 
Location: az
13,762 posts, read 8,014,399 times
Reputation: 9418
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeyJude514 View Post
This is true for anyone who values shallowness over substance. Melania is the very definition of the former; a porn star whose only accomplishment in life is that she managed to snag a rich old womanizer. She is the perfect front for the Trump cult. There's no "there" there.

Michelle, on the other hand, is an intelligent and accomplished woman in her own right. You know, the kind of woman that scares the crap out of old white men and shallow, moronic Trump cultists.

These two woman perfectly epitomize the difference between the two parties. I'll choose substance every time.
The Dems have pulled back on the attack. Why? It wasn't working too well. Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort hit back with: When Hillary is threatened by a female, the first thing she does is try to destroy them.

The Clinton team doesn't want to go anywhere down that road.
 
Old 07-20-2016, 08:04 AM
 
Location: Chicago
5,559 posts, read 4,631,471 times
Reputation: 2202
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
please stop it, there are plenty of websites that you can use to check for plagiarism put the text of her speech in any one of them and it will come back as plagiarized and I don't blame her. But for crap's sake think about the kind of President Trump would be, this is such a careless lazy campaign that she was allowed on stage with this speech? Who is running this campaign it seems that there is no fact checking, no vetting of speeches, no coordination - it is scary to think that this guy could run the US, a job which leaves little room for error.
It was all planned and coordinated and the Democratic dumb dumbs fell for it. This is the big time and observe how ace manipulators work.
 
Old 07-20-2016, 08:05 AM
 
Location: Chicago
5,559 posts, read 4,631,471 times
Reputation: 2202
Quote:
Originally Posted by john3232 View Post
The Dems have pulled back on the attack. Why? It wasn't working too well. Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort hit back with: When Hillary is threatened by a female, the first thing she does is try to destroy them.

The Clinton team doesn't want to go anywhere down that road.
That's it. And the media went for it hook line and sinker.
 
Old 07-20-2016, 08:06 AM
 
Location: az
13,762 posts, read 8,014,399 times
Reputation: 9418
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
please stop it, there are plenty of websites that you can use to check for plagiarism put the text of her speech in any one of them and it will come back as plagiarized and I don't blame her. But for crap's sake think about the kind of President Trump would be, this is such a careless lazy campaign that she was allowed on stage with this speech? Who is running this campaign it seems that there is no fact checking, no vetting of speeches, no coordination - it is scary to think that this guy could run the US, a job which leaves little room for error.

James Carville believes it was a deliberate act of sabotage within the Trump campaign and he might be right. This is more damaging politically than the plagiarism charge but its seems as if Dems have moved on.
 
Old 07-20-2016, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,301,017 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by richrf View Post
It was all planned and coordinated and the Democratic dumb dumbs feel for it. This is the big time and observe how ace manipulators work.
Oh I see, they intentionally had Melania give a plagiarized speech so that they could accomplish exactly WHAT?
 
Old 07-20-2016, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Out in the Badlands
10,420 posts, read 10,834,015 times
Reputation: 7801
The main stream media twists reporting with such ferocity, that when I view their content (which not very often) I feel like a whirling dervish.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_Cf...th_mbM&index=5
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top