Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-29-2015, 12:56 PM
 
6,720 posts, read 8,388,075 times
Reputation: 10409

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bungalove View Post
Good gosh, there are a lot of skimpy clothes in view today, but y'all must have forgotten the late 60's and early 70's. I remember wearing hot pants to the office (my boss certainly never complained) and buying tunic-length tops to wear as dresses. Mini-skirts, the shorter the better, were de rigeur for all my friends. The only difference I can think of between then and now was we didn't have much cleavage exposed, nor did we have our navels in sight. Otherwise, it was pretty wild back then!
I think there are a variety of reasons for the people who complain about lack of modesty and declining morals...

Being very modest in oneself
Being very religious
Forgetting what it was like back in earlier times
Not being alive when risqué fashions were de rigueur
Equating the human body with lust or sin
Getting older and getting crochety

Between 1795-1820 English and French fashion for the upper classes dictated showing the human form beneath clothing. Men's fashions were very fitted and tight. Women's fashions were sheer and you could see the breasts beneath. Women often chose to dampen the muslin fabric to make it cling and some rouged the areolas.

That's just one example, as there are countless ones throughout history.

Each generation is not getting more hedonistic, immodest, or spoiled. Some people are more modest than others, and it has been that way for all of human history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-29-2015, 01:04 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,210 posts, read 107,859,557 times
Reputation: 116138
OP, I don't see the semi-transparent-type yoga pants or leggings where I live. If that's what you're complaining about, it makes more sense. But I might consider it another weird variation on on tendencies toward revealing dress in the past: mini-skirts, low-cut blouses, etc.

Really, you haven't seen anything outrageous until you've been to Russia, and seen the women there wearing tiny black spandex skirts that ride up over their rears whenever they have to bend over. This is common for restaurant workers. Even the guys I was with on one trip were put off, and asked why so many young women dress like prostitutes, and don't care how much they show. And this is not a recent trend. It's been going on since the USSR crashed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2015, 01:22 PM
 
Location: City of the Angels
2,222 posts, read 2,344,803 times
Reputation: 5422
Women have a tendency to show more skin when the stock market is booming

What Skirt Lengths Tell You About The Stock Market
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2015, 02:55 PM
 
15,546 posts, read 12,017,382 times
Reputation: 32595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vodoven View Post
With the word "covered" it seems you're overlooking the main effect of yoga pants, i.e. the visual appearance of nudity without actual skin showing. They are ridiculously form-fitting. Do women somehow not see them as men do?
I don't see how they're any different then most other pants or skirts/dresses in terms of showing off the shape of a woman's body. I am wearing a dress today that doesn't show any cleavage, is flowy, and goes down to about my knees. But guess what? Anyone can still tell that I have breasts, a butt and all the other parts that any other human being has. And since it doesn't go down to my ankles you can also see the shape of my legs!

Yoga pants do not make a person look nude. There is a big difference between being naked and wearing these:

http://pics.ae.com/is/image/aeo/0491...d=450&qlt=50,0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vodoven View Post
Well, surely you've noticed that leggings aka yoga pants
leggings are not also known as yoga pants. Leggings and yoga pants are too different things. Yoga pants are what I posted above. Leggings are these:

http://www.loveshapewear.co.uk/media...---front-2.jpg

Or there are compression leggings (running tights), but they are pretty thick and not shear.

http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/73...c2416ca88c.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2015, 03:19 PM
 
Location: southwestern PA
22,587 posts, read 47,649,975 times
Reputation: 48236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vodoven View Post
Well, surely you've noticed that leggings aka yoga pants (and jeggings) are a lot more common as casual public wear in the past X years (maybe 5, maybe 10)?
Leggings are NOT aka yoga pants.
They are distinctly different articles of clothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2015, 03:37 PM
 
28,666 posts, read 18,779,066 times
Reputation: 30944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sundaydrive00 View Post
I don't see how they're any different then most other pants or skirts/dresses in terms of showing off the shape of a woman's body. I am wearing a dress today that doesn't show any cleavage, is flowy, and goes down to about my knees. But guess what? Anyone can still tell that I have breasts, a butt and all the other parts that any other human being has. And since it doesn't go down to my ankles you can also see the shape of my legs!
Then whatever these are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2015, 03:58 PM
 
15,546 posts, read 12,017,382 times
Reputation: 32595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph_Kirk View Post

Tights or leggings that are too small. Not something I've ever seen in public so not something most women wear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2015, 05:45 PM
 
19,969 posts, read 30,213,440 times
Reputation: 40041
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sommie789 View Post
So what are women suppose to wear?


a smile
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2015, 05:59 PM
 
28,666 posts, read 18,779,066 times
Reputation: 30944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sundaydrive00 View Post
Tights or leggings that are too small. Not something I've ever seen in public so not something most women wear.
What makes you think you've seen most women--and everything they've ever worn?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2015, 06:12 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,210 posts, read 107,859,557 times
Reputation: 116138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph_Kirk View Post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top