Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The 14th Amendment cites "all persons born or naturlized and subject to the jurisdiction thereof". It makes
no reference to those who have crossed illegally and simply dropped babies across the border. It's been
grossly misinterpreted for decades.
The 14th Amendment cites "all persons born or naturlized and subject to the jurisdiction thereof". It makes
no reference to those who have crossed illegally and simply dropped babies across the border. It's been
grossly misinterpreted for decades.
This has never made sense in any way.
Agreed, the qualifier to claim birthright citizenship is for their parents to be subject to our jurisdiction and they are not. If that were not so than the term "and" subject to the jurisdiction thereof would not have been included as part of that clause. It's so simple that it's mind boggling that it's been miss-interpreted for so long along with so many regular American who just can't seem grasp what that clause means or don't want to for whatever their agenda is.
The 14th Amendment cites "all persons born or naturlized and subject to the jurisdiction thereof". It makes
no reference to those who have crossed illegally and simply dropped babies across the border. It's been
grossly misinterpreted for decades.
This has never made sense in any way.
If Trump banned it then it would be opposed by the dems and SCOTUS would decide. Maybe Trump is waiting for RBG to kick the bucket so he can put in a sensible judge. Then he would have a much better chance.
Fantastic, all 1326 of them of which some where victims of administrative error. Or of parents failing to follow through on obtaining documentation for their children then moving to a foreign country regardless. Some of the examples sounded like scams to gain French papers. Very poor example here in supporting your ascertain that this issue is in anyway a significant problem in ANY country in the world.
Let it go and move on to another cause like the flat earth theory.
If Trump banned it then it would be opposed by the dems and SCOTUS would decide. Maybe Trump is waiting for RBG to kick the bucket so he can put in a sensible judge. Then he would have a much better chance.
That would be my guess. She’s holding on like her departure would mean the end of the universe.
Status:
"It Can't Rain All The Time"
(set 25 days ago)
Location: North Pacific
15,754 posts, read 7,589,592 times
Reputation: 2576
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanQuest
Fantastic, all 1326 of them of which some where victims of administrative error. Or of parents failing to follow through on obtaining documentation for their children then moving to a foreign country regardless. Some of the examples sounded like scams to gain French papers. Very poor example here in supporting your ascertain that this issue is in anyway a significant problem in ANY country in the world.
Let it go and move on to another cause like the flat earth theory.
I didn't expect for you to admit (ending BR citizenship) that you see how creating a national citizens registry would ever be a problem. Even though we have the German history in the creation of such a registry to show us what it is and how that all works out ... it's America.
Trust me, it won't bother me in the least, that the u.s. won't be able to collect taxes on people who are born here. But apparently for some people, it matters, that they are excluded.
How can some of you be for abortion but against the stoppage of illegals or birth right citizenship? Hell even Bernie likes the idea of abortion to control the population.
Good question. I ask the same thing about how can you be for the environment and climate change, but then be for packing this country with as many people as you can, when it will be a disaster to our environment and resources?
Good question. I ask the same thing about how can you be for the environment and climate change, but then be for packing this country with as many people as you can, when it will be a disaster to our environment and resources?
It's obvious that the Democrats are hypocrites. Just like it makes no sense for them to attack the rich but want their cheap, illegal workers to stay here making the rich, richer.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I didn't expect for you to admit (ending BR citizenship) that you see how creating a national citizens registry would ever be a problem. Even though we have the German history in the creation of such a registry to show us what it is and how that all works out ... it's America. 
