Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Funny that the guy with the anchor baby children and the chain migrating parents-in-law takes such an interested in this. Meanwhile, his supporters don't get the irony. Then there's wife #3 who overstayed her visa but that's okay because some money changed hands to buy her a 'genius' visa for all of the languages that she doesn't actually know how to speak.
How is it that he's got such a loyal base? Because they've got Trump Derangement Syndrome. They've been conned and don't have a clue.
Trump's kids are not anchor babies. He is a U.S. citizen therefore his kids can't be anchor babies. I'm sure his in-laws and his wife could prove that they weren't going to be a burden to our society. That's how chain migration should work. As for your other claims you have proof of them and will provide a viable link here, right?
Funny that the guy with the anchor baby children and the chain migrating parents-in-law takes such an interested in this. Meanwhile, his supporters don't get the irony. Then there's wife #3 who overstayed her visa but that's okay because some money changed hands to buy her a 'genius' visa for all of the languages that she doesn't actually know how to speak.
How is it that he's got such a loyal base? Because they've got Trump Derangement Syndrome. They've been conned and don't have a clue.
Anchor baby children? Do you even know what that is?
I guess you never heard of a term call "derivative citizenship" also known as “jus sanguinis” under INA?
Last time i checked Trump is a US citizen. How can his children be "anchor baby children"? Is it because his wife is a naturalized citizen? I guess that makes Obama an "anchor baby" because his dad was born in Kenya?
I didn't expect for you to admit (ending BR citizenship) that you see how creating a national citizens registry would ever be a problem. Even though we have the German history in the creation of such a registry to show us what it is and how that all works out ... it's America.
Trust me, it won't bother me in the least, that the u.s. won't be able to collect taxes on people who are born here. But apparently for some people, it matters, that they are excluded.
Oh brother. Well neither one of us is excluded from this forum, so keep your chin up.
If Trump banned it then it would be opposed by the dems and SCOTUS would decide. Maybe Trump is waiting for RBG to kick the bucket so he can put in a sensible judge. Then he would have a much better chance.
It'll never even get past the Senate, never mind the House or get enough States onboard. You and your klan are dreaming.
BTW, the President has no role in this process. He cannot bring forward nor veto a bill to Congress.
Or maybe you didn't know that it would have to be a change to the 14th Amendment?
Funny that the guy with the anchor baby children and the chain migrating parents-in-law takes such an interested in this. Meanwhile, his supporters don't get the irony. Then there's wife #3 who overstayed her visa but that's okay because some money changed hands to buy her a 'genius' visa for all of the languages that she doesn't actually know how to speak.
How is it that he's got such a loyal base? Because they've got Trump Derangement Syndrome. They've been conned and don't have a clue.
Fail. Why can’t all blacks be like Colin Powell? Your reasoning is as clumsy as Joe Biden after 3 Ambien.
Agree. The Pres cannot amend/alter the 14th amend.
Same thing with the 2nd amend.
As has already been discussed, there is no need to amend the 14th on birthright citizenship as it's already clear in the wording that babies born from illegal alien parents are not birthright citizens. It just needs to be brought before the Supreme Court for clarification once and for all.
As has already been discussed, there is no need to amend the 14th on birthright citizenship as it's already clear in the wording that babies born from illegal alien parents are not birthright citizens. It just needs to be brought before the Supreme Court for clarification once and for all.
That's basically how leftist got the much more dubious gay marriage. So if you don't think that was BS then you certainly can't say SCOTUS deciding on birthright citizenship is BS.
That's basically how leftist got the much more dubious gay marriage. So if you don't think that was BS then you certainly can't say SCOTUS deciding on birthright citizenship is BS.
Nonsense. This is a well established constitutional position. A couple of folk on the right have decided that the 14th is not a good thing so they are torturing the plain language to get the desired result. The court is not going to get near this one and would inevitably decide in the favor of jus soli if anyone can find a case that the court will agree to her.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I didn't expect for you to admit (ending BR citizenship) that you see how creating a national citizens registry would ever be a problem. Even though we have the German history in the creation of such a registry to show us what it is and how that all works out ... it's America. 
