Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Was it an entertaining film?
Of the 4 Indy movies, where would 'you' place it. Is it at least better than the third installment (which I truly disliked).
The movie was ok for the 1st 40 mins then it just gets sillier. Lucasfilm should have passed the torch or allowed the story to end after Crusades.
Crystal Skull was really bad but if they had a decent story they could have pass the torch to Indy's son. Although, Shia was the wrong choice for the character.
The movie was ok for the 1st 40 mins then it just gets sillier. Lucasfilm should have passed the torch or allowed the story to end after Crusades.
Crystal Skull was really bad but if they had a decent story they could have pass the torch to Indy's son. Although, Shia was the wrong choice for the character.
Thank god that the son has been killed off in the Vietnam War here. Shia alone ruined that last Indy film for me (along with an overdose of CGI).
Thank god that the son has been killed off in the Vietnam War here. Shia alone ruined that last Indy film for me (along with an overdose of CGI).
The dumbest character was Mutt. The name, his backstory, etc. If Lucas want to milk Indiana Jones more then they should have created a better son to take the mantle from Indy.
Not sure what the plan is with Helena as she is not a likeable character nor an actual Jones.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.