Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-05-2010, 09:36 AM
 
Location: West Orange, NJ
12,546 posts, read 21,410,268 times
Reputation: 3730

Advertisements

oh and you're 88% stat from 2009 isn't exactly screaming "crappy school"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-05-2010, 09:39 AM
 
Location: West Orange, NJ
12,546 posts, read 21,410,268 times
Reputation: 3730
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGambler View Post
Ugh, the school discussion again. People are so obsessed with statistics. Look, if you (as parents) place a high value on education and you and your children associate with others who feel the same way, your child will be fine.

I don't think you need to spend a fortune on a house in Millburn to find this out. I wouldn't want my child to go to a poorly performing school district, but I wouldn't want my child growing up to be a snob who thinks a trip to the Short Hills Mall is a vast cultural experience, either. And before anyone invokes the false Bible that is NJ Monthly Magazine, remember - they don't hire statisticians, they hire editors and ad salesmen. There's a reason why only certain towns in North Jersey (not coincidentally, where they have heavy subscription and advertiser bases) seem to have the "best" schools, doctors, butchers, bakers and candlestick makers in their rankings.
good point gambler. i'm not trying to quote it as bible, just looking for stats and rankings. bottom line is, they can't be horrendously off without some backlash when it comes to something like school ranking. even if their margin of error is a few off, you can still get a general sense of the schools from their rankings no?

i'm all for better rankings, and of course stats can tell you anything.

short hills mall isn't a cultural experience? i find it hugely entertaining to visit! lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 11:14 AM
 
8 posts, read 13,631 times
Reputation: 20
NJ Monthly is acceptable as a reputable ranking system by most educators. Lots of stats on different factors that may be important for parents. However, if their is one criticism of NJ monthly among many academic observers is its heavy weighted slant on "adding a large % of extra points on socio economic status of districts".
A distric letter J ( Top Tier Affluent District) would get penalized more than a letter I district ( 2nd top tier Affuent district). A letter GH district like West Orange would get less points than a Letter B district from Jersey city ( since B is lower than GH)

So for informative purposes, its fine. It still gives the reader an overall idea of how their district is doing.

But if it took away any " Socio-Economic" adjustments in the equation, a school like Jersey City's McNair Academic ( which is a very good magnet school for talented kids in JC ) would not even make the cut in the top 10. ( as opposed to being ranked between # 1 to # 3 in the entire state of NJ for the last 3 NJ Monthly rankings since 2004. )

While a Letter I status Glen Ridge, ( which has a superb district of upper middle class students) would drop down a few notches from its # 5 rankings & would be surpassed by a Letter J status district of Ridgewood & Chatham. ( if socio-economic adjustments were not made)

So from a purely unbiased, no human interventation, fact based #'s of student SAT's, % going to 4 yr colleges, % of of those who graduate, % of those taking AP's, etc. - the rankings would have similarities but changes would also happen.

Many educators prefer the Wall Street Journal rankings of High Schools. The only problem is they come out with it less frequently than a NJ Monthly or US News. They also mix all the states together. The only other major difference is Wall Street Journal ranks Private & Public schools together. They make no distinction or any weight whether its private or public. Its pretty head to head based on #'s.

The other reason many educators find Wall Street Journal more appealing is it goes for what many parents consider " MORE RELEVANT" than just SAT scores or # of AP classes.

They go for " What Colleges do students get accepted", " % of students in each high school that are accepted in Top Tier 1 Colleges, % of students who attend 4 yr. instutions", etc.

NJ Monthly & US News gives more statistics per say, but what WSJ gives is " Bottom Line" information for what many, if not most parents want to know. They are suppose to come out with their next one for 2010-2011.

The Wall street Journal shows strong showing of schools in states like Massachusetts, New York, California & New Jersey. The only drawback ( or should I say it reconfirms) is that it exposes why the Rich & Affluent send their kids to these expensive private schools. It produces results in terms of giving their kids a Better Shot, a higher probability of getting accepted into the best colleges in the nation.

Its no suprise that highest performing High schools are the same High schools that powerful people like George W. Bush, Mitt Romney, John Kerry, Al Gore, George H. Bush, Chelsea Clinton attended.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 12:55 PM
 
Location: West Orange, NJ
12,546 posts, read 21,410,268 times
Reputation: 3730
marie - i'm curious as to what you mean about the socio-economic adjustments. can you explain what they're adjusting? and based on what? does it spell this methodology out on their site? i'm curious. thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 01:05 PM
 
8 posts, read 13,631 times
Reputation: 20
Brad- they gather specific data per district based on factors such as :

1) Percent of adults with no high school diploma
2) Percent of adults with some college education
3) Occupational status
4) Unemployment rate
5) Percent of individuals in poverty
6) Median family income

They then take the above into consideration, assign values(points) & take all the above into account in determining what would likely occur if ALL THINGS BEING EQUAL should happen.

I'm not sure if all this is spelled out in the NJ Monthly Mag.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 01:10 PM
 
8 posts, read 13,631 times
Reputation: 20
Concept is somewhat similar to "extra points" assigned to specific college applicant especially in Tier 1 & Tier 2 Colleges. These applicants who may be disadvantaged based on Economic and/or Racial factors. A lower test score is not an automatic rejection due to possible socio-economic factors of the student. Additional points are assigned to the final decision outcome to see if applicant makes it or not into the college.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 01:57 PM
 
Location: West Orange, NJ
12,546 posts, read 21,410,268 times
Reputation: 3730
makes sense. so they try to compensate for some of those intangibles, like some parents caring more than others. obviously - not an exact science. interesting though! thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 04:42 PM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
2,771 posts, read 6,277,486 times
Reputation: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarieLLC View Post
But if it took away any " Socio-Economic" adjustments in the equation, a school like Jersey City's McNair Academic ( which is a very good magnet school for talented kids in JC ) would not even make the cut in the top 10
This is actually not true. If you look at the SAT scores, and ignore everything else, it still makes the top 10 (though not 1-3 any more), and handily beats Glen Ridge.

http://njmonthly.com/downloads/1527/...hschools08.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 04:54 PM
 
3,269 posts, read 9,938,068 times
Reputation: 2025
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradykp View Post
sorry i was working with 2010 stats:

"95% of WOHS graduating seniors will begin college this fall at some of the most prestigious schools in the country including..."

it's not a newsletter - it's the quarterly tax bill from the mayor.
You have not posted any stats at all, save for something the mayor wrote. Show me excellent sat scores, proficiency rates...anything.

Listen if you are happy with the education you will get at WO HS then great. Like I said before, each to his own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
2,771 posts, read 6,277,486 times
Reputation: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradykp View Post
elflord, i'm very familiar with lower merion. i am not sure what you define as "middle clas", but only the upper middle class can afford to live in that school district, even in the "more affordable" parts of it.
Take a look at listings in Ardmore, Narberth and Belmont Hills. Plenty of places in the low 200s. Of course these are very small, but you do get to go to Lower Merion schools, and we're talking about a mortgage payment lower than your Millburn property tax bill.

Housing prices look about 1/3 lower to me than similar places in New York, and there is more available on the lower end (e.g. twins, row houses, and smaller houses).

Likewise, there are places in Havertown (Haverford school district) in that price range.

Quote:
not sure where you commute to, but driving around philly to get to some parts is a nightmare, not to mention you have to take on the cost of a car and insurance (philly insurance isn't cheap either, even by NJ standards!).
Quite a bit cheaper than NJ ! I don't drive into the city, but unlike Manhattan it is possible.

I got a slight bump in compensation after I moved, and with housing costs about 2/3 of what they are in North Jersey, that's not a bad deal.

I guess I never got to enjoy this "NY salary" thing (even with a "Wall Street" job -- with all those state workers making 200k+, you really need to rake it in to live in the nicer towns. My understanding is that the rank and file on Wall St are largely making under 150k, though there are some (traders and bankers) who may make much more than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top