Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Then i am not delusional. There has never been a full investigation into the matter.
Of course there has. There is only one authority in the universe qualified to authenticate the president's birth record; the State of Hawaii. And they have declared it authentic.
If you desire further investigation, you must earn it by coming up with evidence to rebut the birth certificate. In almost four years of trying, Birthers still have been unable to come up with a shred.
That is why Birthers are delusional by definition.
Quote:
Originally Posted by modeerf
The false document that this administration presented is far from validating.
The assertion without evidence that the document is false is a textbook example of delusion. All the evidence that actually exists points inescapably to its authenticity. There is no evidence that it is not authentic.
And yet the delusion that is fake persists.
Quote:
Originally Posted by modeerf
As a Historian, you must agree that documentary proof is held up to the highest peer review, in order for acceptance.
As a Historian I understand that the reason vital records like birth certificate were invented in the first place was to create the single absolutely authoritative source for information on birth, death and marriage. That is why a State issued and certified birth certificate is absolute legal proof of the information it contains.
Now... that is not to say that such a certificate's legal status as prima facie proof cannot be rebutted. But here we are approaching in two weeks the fourth anniversary of the invention of Birthism on the FreeRepublic Forum, and Birthers have yet to come up with a single shred of evidence to rebut it.
That is why belief in its falsity is objectively delusional.
Quote:
Originally Posted by modeerf
In this age of corruption, and lies. I am not so inclined to accept what ever is presented as truth.
Your inclinations are meaningless to the law or to the truth. We marginalize the delusional for a reason.
OK I didn't read the entire thread so if this has been covered, sorry for the duplication. If the active military members who wish to participate were smart and/or organized enough there would be an easy way for them to be in uniform enough to identify them as active members without being in uniform enough to be afoul of the UCMJ.
If they are right, they are following their contract.
No. It's still a breach. If they breach their contract, they can kiss their future goodbye as it is punishable by dishonorable discharge.
Again you're operating based off of YOUR opinion and nothing more. You can point fingers and throw labels at the POTUS all you want. It's still the duty of the military to protect him AND uphold the Constitution. You can't choose to do one and not the other.
Quote:
You are confusing respect with commitment to country. It is the job of POTUS to uphold his office not the military.
The POTUS has the military to help him in that regard. Ever hear of high ranking military officials? Joint Chief of Staffs? Chief of Naval Operations? They help the POTUS uphold his office. It's a joint effort. No one person can win on their own.
You're just making something out of nothing. Which is laughable.
In a Poll 500 marching would equate to 5 million in agreement. Seeing as we have 2.5 million active duty.
No.
500 marching are self selecting. Any such "poll" is worhless out of the gate.
Last edited by gallowsCalibrator; 02-20-2012 at 02:50 PM..
Reason: Discuss topic, not poster
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.