Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Your comparing apples to oranges here. Even a doctor will tell you that an annual pap test is a preventive measure to more serious health problems in the future. Your grasping at straws now.
Your comparing apples to oranges here. Even a doctor will tell you that an annual pap test is a preventive measure to more serious health problems in the future. Your grasping at straws now.
You are avoiding the question.
Would you agree that mandatory pap tests should be legislated by non-medical qualified politicians? Ie, that women should be forced by law to have a pap smear without their consent?
Sorry but you can't compare people kept as chattel with a blob.
You're right, at least slaves were given a chance at life. Between 1973 and 2008, more than 50 million innocent babies were legally slaughtered before they could ever see the light of day. They were never even given a chance at life.
Please provide proof of that. Provide proof that it is never necessary to have at least an abdominal sonogram before an abortion and that a transvaginal sonogram isn't more accurate and used for that purpose.
It's not medically necessary unless there are complications. But that's not the point.
If it IS medically necessary, then that is a decision by a qualified medical doctor who will advise the woman then ask for her consent.
It should never be a decision by non-medically qualified politicians legislating that a woman be forced to undergo a medical procedure WITHOUT her consent.
"First trimester ultrasounds are not part of routine prenatal care. Many insurance companies will not cover first trimester ultrasound without a medical indication, such as vaginal bleeding or severe pelvic pain. So why are politicians now requiring this expensive procedure for a woman who plans to terminate her pregnancy?"
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by BirchBarlow
You're right, at least slaves were given a chance at life. Between 1973 and 2008, more than 50 million innocent babies were legally slaughtered before they could ever see the light of day. They were never even given a chance at life.
Babies?
Please document your seemingly baseless, hyperbolic allegation with something factual.
You do realize the TOS prohibit being deliberately misleading, right?
You're right, at least slaves were given a chance at life. Between 1973 and 2008, more than 50 million innocent babies were legally slaughtered before they could ever see the light of day. They were never even given a chance at life.
Yes I'm sure that they really enjoyed that life as well :roll eyes:.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagonut
It is.
Prove it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
