Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Maybe Romney's first act will be to annex Mexico. We could solve alot of problems that way - drugs, trade, illegal immigration,etc...
We don't even how to do all the work - we can let the drug cartels weaken Mexico to the point where we can just walk in, take Mexico City, and only have to pay off the cartels so that they leave us alone.
Looks like Hawaii didn't verify when Obama was allegedly born. Most troubling. Here is the pdf below of what Hawaii sent Bennett. The date of Obama's birth is not there. It is a very clever artfully worded response after Bennett was asked to change his requests as indicated by this sentence below in a article I found:
'The reported verification from Hawaii came only after Bennett, a Republican who has aspirations to run for governor, closely tailored his request to conform to the [demands] of Hawaii’s attorney general.'
But Bennett didn't get confirmation that the Certificate of Live Birth attached was "the real deal", only that the information contained therein matched. Nowhere does that state that the record in question is LEGALLY VALID. What I can see that differs between Bennett’s request (below) and what he received is that this request was not fulfilled by the final response:
“Additionally, please verify that the attached copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama is a true and accurate representation of the original record in your files.”
What Bennett got was just that the INFORMATION on what Obama posted on April 27, 2011 is the same as what they have. They wouldn’t say that it is a 'true and accurate representation in their original record' as Bennett requested above.
They can’t legally say that if the birth certificate is REALLY half written and half typed as former Director Of Hawaiian Health Fukino was quoted saying in a MSNBC interview to Michael Isikoff two weeks before Obama released the forgery on April 27, 2011.It looks as though state registrar Alvin Onaka was unable to verify Obama's COLB was a 'true and accurate representation' due to the fact that it was a forgery as discovered by the Maricopa County Sheriff Department. Once again, Hawaii just states Obama was born.
It should be pointed out that most Americans would be unable to get an copy of their original birth certificate. I was born in the state of Missouri and recently tried to do this. I happen to have a copy of my "original" birth certificate printed on the paper used to get copies from microfilm that dates back to 1954 but that sort of thermal reproduction gives you a copy that darkens with age and now 57 years later it is almost too dark to be legable. Back in 1954 Missouri obviously took the forms signed by the attending physician and witnessed by someone with a notary seal and photographed them and stored the results on sheets or rolls or microfilm. Some time in the last few years Missouri contracted someone to make digital copies of this material. I don't think the state of Missouri wanted to maintain 50 year old technology anymore so some person keyed all of this into a database they apparently chose not to store this as a image file or a pdf . So you now get a form laser printed of course that has no signatures and because it is just a modern piece of paper proves nothing. Laser printers and even the idea of xerography did not exist in 1954. The state of Missouri won't even notarize it to elevate it to the status of a legal document. Afterall many of ther parties named in this document like the attending physician are now dead and buried. Who at Phelps County Medical Center in 2009 could sware as a witness to the birth of a person who has not stepped inside this hospital in half a century? No one could? I bring this up to show the absurdity of insisting that any American produce an original birth certificate as proof of his status as a native born American.
exactly how was obama's vetting different from mccain's?
One difference is John McCain has a birth certificate with fake information! His birth certificate reads the fiction of his birth in the Canal Zone at a Navy clinic on base, not the hospital he was born at in the city of Colon on Panamanian territory. By Panamanian Law he is a dual national or a Panamanian -American citizen. McCain was an American by blood not by soil. Obama has both soil and blood and even if he were born in Kenya which is NOT, he was just as if not more native born than John McCain!
The McCain camp in 2000 got a sense of the Senate resolution that he was an American born citizen regardless of what his birth certificate says.
One difference is John McCain has a birth certificate with fake information!
the only mccain birth certificate to be made public was a hoax. mccain never released his birth certificate ( he did show it to a single reporter but that reporter did not photograph or copy it in any way ).
Quote:
By Panamanian Law he is a dual national or a Panamanian -American citizen.
almost...... one bizarre glitch. the year of mccain's birth congress specifically considered births in the canal zone "US nationals" and not "US citizen". this was later changed after mccains birth and made retroactive.
panama does consider those born in the canal zone to be panamanian.
Quote:
The McCain camp in 2000 got a sense of the Senate resolution that he was an American born citizen regardless of what his birth certificate says.
in 2008 there was a non-binding senate resolution that was passed unanimously without debate that specifically addressed mccain's "natural born citizen" status.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.