Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-19-2012, 12:24 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,061 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by green_mariner View Post
Well, for starters, you need a better indicator than skin color. Come up with a better indicator than skin color.
Why? The statistics are pretty clear.
Quote:
Stop and frisk violates the 4th amendment.
4th Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated

What's unreasonable about a suspicion triggered by the 8 times higher probability that a person who is a member of a certain identifiable group will commit a gun homicide?
Quote:
Actually, what this shows is that criminals, of any race, do not care, and see themselves as above the law, and would continue to commit these crimes.
Not exactly. There are HUGE differences in crime rates among the various racial groups. Clearly, some races more than others see themselves as above the law, and would continue to commit these crimes regardless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-19-2012, 12:27 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,061 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
Do you even live in Chicago???
In the suburbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 12:28 PM
 
6,331 posts, read 5,213,094 times
Reputation: 1640
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
In the suburbs.
So no, you don't live in Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 12:31 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,061 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
So no, you don't live in Chicago.
Live in the suburbs. Work in the city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 12:33 PM
 
73,041 posts, read 62,646,469 times
Reputation: 21941
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Why? The statistics are pretty clear. 4th Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated

What's unreasonable about a suspicion triggered by the 8 times higher probability that a person who is a member of a certain identifiable group will commit a gun homicide?
Not exactly. There are HUGE differences in crime rates among the various racial groups. Clearly, some races more than others see themselves as above the law, and would continue to commit these crimes regardless.
No. Prove to me that skin color is a good physical indicator that a person will commit a crime. You have not proven that skin color will make a person commit a crime.

If you aren't breaking the law, then stop-and-frisk is against one's constitutional rights, statistics notwithstanding. The Constitution does not say anything about crime statistics. It says unreasonable search and seizure. If you aren't breaking the law, and you get stopped and searched, no matter what the statistics say, that is illegal.

It is not certain races, it is certain INDIVIDUALS within a race that see themselves as above the law. Most Blacks in America do obey the law. In fact, if you add up ALL of the crimes committed by Blacks, that still leaves a large majority of Blacks who do not commit crimes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 12:35 PM
 
73,041 posts, read 62,646,469 times
Reputation: 21941
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Live in the suburbs. Work in the city.
You don't have a Chicago address, so by technicality you don't live in the CITY of Chicago. There is a difference between metropolitan Chicago and the city of Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 12:35 PM
 
6,331 posts, read 5,213,094 times
Reputation: 1640
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Live in the suburbs. Work in the city.
Still, you don't live in Chicago. You claiming or suggesting you live in Chicago is like claiming the residents of Newton live in NYC.

I suppose you blame the violence in Newton on the spillover from NYC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 12:39 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,061 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by green_mariner View Post
No. Prove to me that skin color is a good physical indicator that a person will commit a crime. You have not proven that skin color will make a person commit a crime.
Even the DoJ breaks crime rates down by race.

Quote:
If you aren't breaking the law, then stop-and-frisk is against one's constitutional rights, statistics notwithstanding.
That's not what the 4th Amendment says, is it? It says it guarantees the right against unreasonable search and seizure. It is reasonable to suspect a member of a DoJ-identified group that is known to commit gun homicides at 8 times the rate of others.

Quote:
It is not certain races, it is certain INDIVIDUALS within a race that see themselves as above the law. Most Blacks in America do obey the law. In fact, if you add up ALL of the crimes committed by Blacks, that still leaves a large majority of Blacks who do not commit crimes.
Does not negate the fact that Blacks commit a grossly disproportionately high amount of crimes. Get those stats back down to a proportionately equal level, and you'd have every right to feel the way you do about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 12:40 PM
 
6,331 posts, read 5,213,094 times
Reputation: 1640
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Even the DoJ breaks crime rates down by race.

That's not what the 4th Amendment says, is it? It says it guarantees the right against unreasonable search and seizure. It is reasonable to suspect a member of a DoJ-identified group that is known to commit gun homicides at 8 times the rate of others.

Does not negate the fact that Blacks commit a grossly disproportionately high amount of crimes. Get those stats back down to a proportionately equal level, and you'd have every right to feel the way you do about it.
For someone that has an extremely negative and low opinion of Blacks, you sure seem to be concerend about their safety.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 12:44 PM
 
6,084 posts, read 6,048,136 times
Reputation: 1916
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Why? The statistics are pretty clear. 4th Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated

What's unreasonable about a suspicion triggered by the 8 times higher probability that a person who is a member of a certain identifiable group will commit a gun homicide?
Not exactly. There are HUGE differences in crime rates among the various racial groups. Clearly, some races more than others see themselves as above the law, and would continue to commit these crimes regardless.
You have to put profiling in its proper context to accomplish its desired goals and results.

Look at who's committing the crimes and where they are committing it. Are there certain areas they frequent, do they wear certain clothes, make certain signs, have certain codes?

Just randomly snatching any one darker than a paper bag is not the way to go when it comes to catching perps.

I agree that the way to really restore order is to bring in the National Guard but you would catch hell on the civil rights/liberties front.

Gentrification seems to be the route to go without catching hell from any side.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top