Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-07-2013, 07:16 AM
 
6,073 posts, read 4,746,641 times
Reputation: 2635

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mackinac81 View Post
Yes, blacks did own slaves...all ten of them did

I love how people trot out that fact as if to take the blame off white southerners for that. Slavery was largely a race based system with white people (and very few black outliers) at the top, and four million black slaves at the bottom. And bringing up black slaveowners won't change that a bit.
putting the blame on white southerners is where you are wrong. the average southern soldier in the civil war didn't own shoes. you think he owned slaves? you had a system of rich white aristocrats at the top who owned slaves, and controlled the flow of information. don't pretend that all southerners were slave owners, and that they actually knew what they were fighting for in the civil war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-07-2013, 07:33 AM
 
Location: Meggett, SC
11,011 posts, read 11,018,321 times
Reputation: 6192
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4thand1 View Post
The American slave system was like none other in the history of existence. A group of people were permantely stripped of their identity and culture. Unlike whites, you can find only a handful of blacks (myself included) who could trace their ancestry as far back to the 17th century. We are still feeling the after effects of it and Jim Crow.
Point of fact, you are incorrect on the bolded portion (emphasis mine). If you recall your history lessons, slavery was extremely prolific in South America and the Caribbean during the same time it was active in the United States. In fact, Brazil was the most common destination for slaves during the Atlantic Slave Trade. Less than 4% of slaves were sent to the United States.
Fascinating Database about the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade » Sociological Images
Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2013, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,450,777 times
Reputation: 27720
I thought it was kinda funny.
July would be a good month to be "White History Month".
Actually has a nice ring to it.

Whites are becoming a minority and are already in some states so why not prepare ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2013, 08:40 AM
 
20,524 posts, read 15,895,818 times
Reputation: 5948
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Dude, nobody in the middle east was white. You need to put down that European blond haired blue eyed Jesus and do a little exploration into the world of genetics.
Uh; those people ARE "white" going by their DNA. Not all of us are pasty in color. Sheesh!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2013, 08:51 AM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,035,296 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by lionsgators View Post
putting the blame on white southerners is where you are wrong. the average southern soldier in the civil war didn't own shoes.
Just goes to show you how po' white folks fought against their own class interest 150 years ago and still do today. Ya at gotta at least give'em props for being consistent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2013, 08:52 AM
 
199 posts, read 160,954 times
Reputation: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by mackinac81 View Post
Yes, blacks did own slaves...all ten of them did

I love how people trot out that fact as if to take the blame off white southerners for that. Slavery was largely a race based system with white people (and very few black outliers) at the top, and four million black slaves at the bottom. And bringing up black slaveowners won't change that a bit.
Ding. We have a winner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2013, 08:57 AM
 
6,073 posts, read 4,746,641 times
Reputation: 2635
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Just goes to show you how po' white folks fought against their own class interest 150 years ago and still do today. Ya at gotta at least give'em props for being consistent.
so you expect poor people in the south to trust the federal government now? it's always telling when a liberal pretends to know what is in the best interest of others. this is why there are poor people who vote for republicans. it's because liberals are an arrogant bunch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2013, 09:28 AM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,035,296 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packard fan View Post
Uh; those people ARE "white" going by their DNA.


As much as "white" folks like to claim non-white folks when it is convenient the people of the Arabian peninsula and northeastern Africa aren't Europeans. So unless you have a temporary opening in the "white" membership club, Jesus (if he existed at all) wasn't "white' by any meaning of the word.

Semitic people - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2013, 09:33 AM
 
20,524 posts, read 15,895,818 times
Reputation: 5948
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post


As much as "white" folks like to claim non-white folks when it is convenient the people of the Arabian peninsula and northeastern Africa aren't Europeans. So unless you have a temporary opening in the "white" membership club, Jesus (if he existed at all) wasn't "white' by any meaning of the word.

Semitic people - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ovcatto: there are 3 races in the world; the rest of us are "mutts". So WHICH "race" are the Arabs? The ones I know call themselves "white". Sheesh!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2013, 09:35 AM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,237,465 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunnyKayak View Post
A picture snapped by a parade-goer at a parade in Hope Mills NC shows a man on a tractor flying a confederate flag and pulling a wagon loaded with watermelons. A sign on the trailer read: “White History Month. Hug WTE PPL.”

Town officials said when the farmer applied for the parade permit he would be hawling watermelons with a sign they are for sale at a nearby bank.



Controversy surrounds float in Hope Mills July 4 parade | abc11.com
Person driving tractor must be confused. Appears to be an American flag being flown [displayed} in the driver's hand, while a confederate flag is being flown {displayed} nearby.
Any rednecks I've ever known only display the confederate flag, and nothing else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top