Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-24-2013, 08:04 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,081 posts, read 51,259,863 times
Reputation: 28330

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Hope this was supposed to be a sarcastic post.

If it was intended to be serious, it is frightening, as it implies that the only value a human being has in an economic one. 'If you can still work, we'll keep you around a little longer. Else, off to the Soylent factory.'
It was not meant to be sarcastic. Frightening? Maybe, but it is reality. As in so many other areas, we are now wanting what we were not willing to pay for. The old people voted and lobbied against higher taxes during their lives in the amount needed to cover their medical expenses. They failed to save for their own care. It is illogical to borrow trillions to care for old people who have neglected their own needs and have no economic value anymore. It is immoral to saddle generations to come with staggering debts, lost opportunity, widespread poverty and a sharply reduced quality of life that will be the price for repaying those debts. As the saying goes: you made your bed, now lie in it.

Last edited by Ponderosa; 07-24-2013 at 08:13 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-24-2013, 08:05 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,119,250 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
What's your solution, death panels?

You beat me to it. So old people don't deserve medical care?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2013, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Too far from home.
8,732 posts, read 6,785,535 times
Reputation: 2375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
It was not meant to be sarcastic. Frightening? Maybe, but it is reality. As in so many other areas, we are now wanting what we were not willing to pay for. The old people voted and lobbied against higher taxes during their lives in the amount needed covered their medical expenses. They failed to save for their own care. It is immoral to borrow trillions to care for old people who have anymore thereby saddling generations to come with staggering debts, lost opportunity, widespread poverty and a sharply reduced quality of life that will be the price for repaying those debts.
Ahhh, I get it. Kill them off because it's all their fault. I think I've heard that from the whiners who aren't contributing anything to this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2013, 08:12 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,081 posts, read 51,259,863 times
Reputation: 28330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaten_Drinker View Post
Medical care should be used only to HEAL illness, not to prolong life. People should be allowed to die of natural causes.
I would add PREVENT illness as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2013, 08:17 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,081 posts, read 51,259,863 times
Reputation: 28330
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
You beat me to it. So old people don't deserve medical care?
That is the emotional question. The reality answer is we can't afford to give them the care they think they deserve. They refused to pay for it when they were young. They refused to save for their own needs. Now, they want to borrow trillions that they will not have to repay to cover the staggering costs of keeping them alive a few more months than they might otherwise have. They simply are not worth it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2013, 08:27 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post
27% of Medicare's annual $327 billion budget goes to care for patients in their final year of life.

The question is can we still afford this kind of expense, and is it right to be spending this much for a hopeless causes when there are more productive ways to spend this money that would be in the better interest of the country and the general welfare of the people.
How could the system be improved.
Unfortunately a lot of this care is given to people who don't want it. This is why it is important to have a living will to prevent hospitals to keep you alive with machines after something happens when you are old. Hospitals generate a lot of profits by keeping such people alive and the relatives are too weak to make the call, but the end result is a patient who is ready to pass, but is not allowed. They die anyway, but not before they suffer unnecessarily. It's a bad death.

Quote:
One of her doctors, Ira Byock, told "60 Minutes" correspondent Steve Kroft it costs up to $10,000 a day to maintain someone in the intensive care unit. Some patients remain here for weeks or even months; one has been there for six months.

"This is the way so many Americans die. Something like 18 to 20 percent of Americans spend their last days in an ICU," Byock told Kroft. "And, you know, it's extremely expensive. It's uncomfortable. Many times they have to be sedated so that they don't reflexively pull out a tube, or sometimes their hands are restrained. This is not the way most people would
want to spend their last days of life. And yet this has become almost the medical last rites for people as they die."

Dr. Byock leads a team that treats and counsels patients with advanced illnesses.

He says modern medicine has become so good at keeping the terminally ill alive by treating the complications of underlying disease that the inevitable process of dying has become much harder and is often prolonged unnecessarily.

"Families cannot imagine there could be anything worse than their loved one dying. But in fact, there are things worse. Most generally, it's having someone you love die badly," Byock said.

Asked what he means by "die badly," Byock told Kroft, "Dying suffering. Dying connected to machines. I mean, denial of death at some point becomes a delusion, and we start acting in ways that make no sense whatsoever. And I think that's collectively what we're doing."

A vast majority of Americans say they want to die at home, but 75 percent die in a hospital or a nursing home.

"How do so many people end up in the hospital?" Kroft asked Dr. Elliott Fisher, a researcher at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy.

"It's the path of least resistance," Fisher said.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-6747002.html

Last edited by Finn_Jarber; 07-24-2013 at 08:44 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2013, 08:59 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,958,729 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
It was not meant to be sarcastic. Frightening? Maybe, but it is reality. As in so many other areas, we are now wanting what we were not willing to pay for. The old people voted and lobbied against higher taxes during their lives in the amount needed to cover their medical expenses. They failed to save for their own care. It is illogical to borrow trillions to care for old people who have neglected their own needs and have no economic value anymore. It is immoral to saddle generations to come with staggering debts, lost opportunity, widespread poverty and a sharply reduced quality of life that will be the price for repaying those debts. As the saying goes: you made your bed, now lie in it.
Perhaps you underscored the difference between liberals and conservatives. Conservatives, such as you, assign an economic value to a human being -- in this case, our parents and grandparents. When they have no economic value left, even though they were the people who won World War II and gave us the lives we no have to enjoy, deny them medical care. Why? Because we don't want to pay what is need to keep them alive. That's a disheartening immoral viewpoint.

Liberals, such as myself, think that human beings have an intrinsic value and the cost of keeping our parents and grandparents alive and affording them the respect due is a worthy price to pay to those who have given us so much. We just shouldn't cast those people into the trash heap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2013, 09:42 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,295,951 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
that does seem to be the only two choices, either treat the elderly in their final stages of life or deny them such care. If one denies such care, it is essentially the death panels that the GOP false claimed Obamacare instituted.
There's a third option, permit people to end their lives with dignity.
Assisted suicide is a valid response to terminal illness and dementia.
Heck, I have no problem with people ending their lives because they're tired of living.
It should be their choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2013, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,823,758 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
That is the emotional question. The reality answer is we can't afford to give them the care they think they deserve. They refused to pay for it when they were young. They refused to save for their own needs. Now, they want to borrow trillions that they will not have to repay to cover the staggering costs of keeping them alive a few more months than they might otherwise have. They simply are not worth it.
Divisive much?

WTH do you mean, "refused to pay for it". Aren't we all paying into Medicare? A separate Medicare tax was enacted in 1965.

"Refused to save for theri own needs"? Please explain.

"Want to borrow trillions"? Ditto

You don't know a lot about health care, and you need an empathy transplant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2013, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,295,951 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
That is the emotional question. The reality answer is we can't afford to give them the care they think they deserve. They refused to pay for it when they were young. They refused to save for their own needs. Now, they want to borrow trillions that they will not have to repay to cover the staggering costs of keeping them alive a few more months than they might otherwise have. They simply are not worth it.
What the hell are you talking about.
The number one reason for bankruptcy in the US is medical costs.

They?
Shall we start with your parents, grandparents, children, siblings, etc?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top