4,000 must die so 300 can defend themselves (Afghanistan, fence, guns, million)

[DoniDanko]

Originally Posted by Rapaport

But they didn't use box cutters to kill 3,000 people, did they?

They couldn't have killed 3,000 w/o the box cutter. If they got on the plain w/o a weapon, they could not have taken the plain over, but I can play dumb too... Answer this, When has a gun ever been used to kill someone?

[TheMoreYouKnow]

Originally Posted by Rapaport

Because less people have more guns...

Prove it. Where are the facts to prove this?

[gunlover]

Originally Posted by Rapaport

But they didn't use box cutters to kill 3,000 people, did they?




I am really lost that people with your level of knowledge can actually find websites to post their ridiculous opinions? How did you manage to do it?

They used the box cutters to hijack the planes, without control of the planes they could not have killed that many people, the box cutters by default are the weapons the hijackers used to gain accuse to the fightback and control of the aircraft.

That is right, change the subject, move on, and personal attacks...Stay classy

[TheMoreYouKnow]

Originally Posted by Rapaport

Here:

That's a chart, show me some facts, show me some data. Prove that less people have guns... you keep saying it over and over again, it should be easy to prove.

[TheMoreYouKnow]

Originally Posted by Rapaport

Do you have a knack for asking stupid questions? Ask the father of the kid who got shot in California recently.

Why don't we ask the parents of the kids who were killed with a knife or the guy who got run over by the killer. Aren't their opinions as valuable?

[gunlover]

Originally Posted by Rapaport

Here:

Debunking Mother Jones' '10 Pro-Gun Myths, Shot Down' | The Truth About Guns


Yeah that is nothing more then a biased poll based on calling selected groups(people in the North East, calling Democrats in vastly large number then other groups,ect).

[TheMoreYouKnow]

Originally Posted by Rapaport

The chart is based on data.

Great, show it to me because the website that put out that chart doesn't list it anywhere.

Here's another one:

Analysis: Fewer U.S. gun owners own more guns - CNN.com

That's based on the same VPC numbers which is all based on surveys which people can and usually lie in. Nice try though.

The cold hard data proves in the US that more guns = less crime of all types.

[TheMoreYouKnow]

Originally Posted by Rapaport

Why would people lie to pollsters? You're delusional.

I'm not delusional, I'm a realist and I don't want anyone to know where I keep a bunch of high dollar items that thieves tend to like.

More importantly, it's none of anyone's business if I own firearms.

[TheMoreYouKnow]

Originally Posted by Rapaport

Here is two more surveys:

Your own chart shows an increase in gun ownership from 1970 - 2010 based on the phone survey. The other line is the same as the survey above.

[TheMoreYouKnow]

Originally Posted by Rapaport

Yup. But Gallup makes clear again:

Makes what clear? Who did they ask? What other questions did they ask?