Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-30-2014, 12:50 PM
 
Location: St Paul
7,713 posts, read 4,750,449 times
Reputation: 5007

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
It would be an interesting stat.

1.) Out of all the shootings in, say, 2013, how many were one gang member shooting another gang member?

2.) And how many were one person with a criminal record, shooting another person with a criminal record?
(Many gang members don't have criminal records with the police.... yet)

3.) And how many were a criminal in the process of committing another crime (robbery, rape etc.) shooting someone?

4.) And how many were justified cases of self-defense by an innocent person?

5.) And how many were suicides?

If you deleted all those, what you have left, is all the law-abiding people shooting other law-abiding people. These are the cases that might be affected by "tighter gun control laws". My guess is, it will be a relatively small number.
Statistically, it's under 5% before discounting "self defense" shootings.

 
Old 05-30-2014, 12:51 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,787,000 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason3000 View Post
Statistically, it's under 5% before discounting "self defense" shootings.
Got a link or reference?
 
Old 05-30-2014, 12:58 PM
 
3,147 posts, read 3,503,896 times
Reputation: 1873
Quote:
Originally Posted by doc1 View Post
Shotguns can be had pretty cheap. Good enough for a home defense weapon.
And I encourage them to purchase them if they can, but when you are in serious poverty you have to choose between feeding your kids and a shotgun, usually feeding the kids comes first.
 
Old 05-30-2014, 12:58 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,465,596 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back to NE View Post
Guns nut love to spout phantom numbers about guns preventing deaths. Few politically spun statistics are as obviously made up/BS as those. Tens of thousands of lives every year are saved because good guys are armed! Let the nonsense begin...
Well, just as they have no way to prove that thousands of lives were saved by people having guns you have no way to prove they weren't. So your contention that few lives were saved due to guns is just as much unsubstantiated nonsense as their contention that many lives were saved.
 
Old 05-30-2014, 01:00 PM
 
59,112 posts, read 27,330,758 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Think4Yourself View Post
Remember this the next time the gun nuts post a thread to only highlight when guns are used defensively. There is over an order of magnitude more cases of criminal gun use.



http://nocera.blogs.nytimes.com/2014...88400000&_r=2&

That's 11,268 people killed or injured vs just 331 instances of defensive gun use in the whole damn country. It's a completely different scale.
Sorry, I will take the FBI stats over the NY Times any day.
 
Old 05-30-2014, 01:09 PM
 
29,503 posts, read 14,663,209 times
Reputation: 14458
Wonder what would have happened to the homeowner or children if he didn't have a firearm....

Central California Man Defends Younger Siblings In Home Invasion Shootout, Killing 1 « CBS San Francisco
 
Old 05-30-2014, 01:10 PM
 
3,147 posts, read 3,503,896 times
Reputation: 1873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
I have maintained from the start, that if all law-abiding adults were allowed to carry weapons, still most of them wouldn't bother.

But crime rates would go way down anyway. Because although the criminals know that most people still aren't carrying, they know that a few in the crowd probably are. Especially in the high-crime area where the criminal hangs out. And so he's less likely to take a fatal chance of mugging or assaulting someone.

I make no exception for anyone due to skin color or whatever. ALL law-abiding adults should be allowed to carry guns. Even if they choose not to, that's up to them.

BTW, many of the "gun control" laws in the country, were put in place to keep guns out of the hands of black people.

Some things don't change much among leftists.

I agree with you completely. If every adult could legally carry, crime rates would plummet.
 
Old 05-30-2014, 01:16 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,787,000 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xander_Crews View Post
I agree with you completely. If every adult could legally carry, crime rates would plummet.
Correct. Even though only a few people would actually carry.

The criminals wouldn't know which ones they were. A definite downer when you're about to assault , rob, or rape a stranger. Especially when there are other law-abiding people around.

It's enough to make a criminal who values his ass, change jobs.
 
Old 05-30-2014, 01:18 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,787,000 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Think4Yourself View Post
Remember this the next time the gun nuts post a thread to only highlight when guns are used defensively. There is over an order of magnitude more cases of criminal gun use.

That's 11,268 people killed or injured vs just 331 instances of defensive gun use in the whole damn country. It's a completely different scale.
Sorry, I will take the FBI stats over the NY Times any day.
Not much point in debunking the misnamed "think4yourself" for the 24th time. As soon as people started questioning his post, he vanished from the thread without replying, and hasn't been seen since.

But he's been posting today, here: CA Gov Moonbeam cuts Texans off at the pass- Sriacha to stay in SoCal ,

here: Maya Angelou On Reaganomics ,

and here: WSJ: The Myth of the Climate Change '97%'; The False Belief That Almost All Scientists Agree About Global Warming

....posting the same kind of BS. Why not drop in and ask him why he left?
 
Old 05-30-2014, 01:22 PM
 
3,147 posts, read 3,503,896 times
Reputation: 1873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Correct. Even though only a few people would actually carry.

The criminals wouldn't know which ones they were. A definite downer when you're about to assault , rob, or rape a stranger. Especially when there are other law-abiding people around.

It's enough to make a criminal who values his ass, change jobs.
Exactly!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top