Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-03-2015, 06:22 AM
 
Location: Fairfax, VA
3,826 posts, read 3,389,337 times
Reputation: 3694

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Actually, the Congress would have to authorize the money for the fence and other measures the bill called for.

Just declare it part of "national defense" and move some money from there. Money for the fence was budgeted and passed during the Bush Administration so the money had already been appropriated and construction started.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-03-2015, 06:25 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,116,982 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
The reason:

Immigration reform not happening under President Obama, Speaker Ryan says | Fox News Latino

If Ryan is bothered by Obama "going around congress," wouldn't the fix be for congress to pass whatever reform they wanted.

IMO, this is nothing but a poorly veiled excuse for Ryan appealing to the hard conservatives without facing his own views as listed here: Paul Ryan on Immigration

Ryan is just another pandering political wimp who scapegoats.

Congress is going to do nothing. Well, it's worked so far, hasn't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2015, 06:29 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,651,295 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsRock View Post
Just declare it part of "national defense" and move some money from there. Money for the fence was budgeted and passed during the Bush Administration so the money had already been appropriated and construction started.
No, "W" asked for money to build a partial fence, and he got it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2015, 06:38 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,758,281 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsRock View Post
Just declare it part of "national defense" and move some money from there. Money for the fence was budgeted and passed during the Bush Administration so the money had already been appropriated and construction started.

That money has already been promised to the defense contractor/ military complex, despite that the Pentagon has NEVER been able to account for spending and has managed to never be audited despite a law requiring it be audited.

Back in 2009, GAO estimated it would cost $400,000- $15 million a mile to finish the fence depending on type of fence, topography, materials, labor costs and land acquisistion. The latter is the real wild card because final costs will not be known until each and every challenge of eminent domain is concluded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2015, 06:39 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,758,281 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
No, "W" asked for money to build a partial fence, and he got it.
670 miles of single layer fence was built between 2006-9 at a cost of $2.4 billion.

38 miles of a 19' double layer fence near El Paso ran $170 million and according to the contractor summary required 1100 people and 600 pieces of equipment.

Costs do not reflect land acquisition.

Last edited by middle-aged mom; 11-03-2015 at 06:51 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2015, 06:40 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,317 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCN View Post
Amen. Why don't "constitutional experts" realize this? The president swears to uphold our laws and then doesn't do it.
Obama has deported more undocumented aliens than prior years, besides illegal immigration reached it's peak in 2008 where was this outcry in 2006, 2007?

What laws does he circumvent, have congress provide more funds for border patrol and legal assistance if you don't think he is deporting enough. It's not as if that is a solution but let congress come up with more money.

Executive orders are well within the powers of the president and they have been used in the past, that is not a circumvention of the constitution.

Last edited by Goodnight; 11-03-2015 at 06:56 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2015, 06:46 AM
 
17,468 posts, read 12,943,456 times
Reputation: 6764
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCN View Post
Amen. Why don't "constitutional experts" realize this? The president swears to uphold our laws and then doesn't do it.
At least he has shown us why he became a Constitutional Lawyer......to screw America!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2015, 07:05 AM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,754 posts, read 14,834,803 times
Reputation: 35584
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
The reason:

Immigration reform not happening under President Obama, Speaker Ryan says | Fox News Latino

If Ryan is bothered by Obama "going around congress," wouldn't the fix be for congress to pass whatever reform they wanted.

IMO, this is nothing but a poorly veiled excuse for Ryan appealing to the hard conservatives without facing his own views as listed here: Paul Ryan on Immigration

Ryan is just another pandering political wimp who scapegoats.


Seriously?

Someone apparently hasn't read the many posts here biotching about do-nothing Ryan, so give me a break with claiming that he's appealing to the hard conservatives by continuing to NOT address what we've already acknowledged that he NEVER addressed before.

You see, that is the difference between Conservatives who talk turkey about the deficiencies in their candidates, and Liberals who follow theirs like sycophants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2015, 07:10 AM
 
17,440 posts, read 9,273,672 times
Reputation: 11907
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
The reason:

Immigration reform not happening under President Obama, Speaker Ryan says | Fox News Latino

If Ryan is bothered by Obama "going around congress," wouldn't the fix be for congress to pass whatever reform they wanted.

IMO, this is nothing but a poorly veiled excuse for Ryan appealing to the hard conservatives without facing his own views as listed here: Paul Ryan on Immigration

Ryan is just another pandering political wimp who scapegoats.
From your own links about Paul Ryan - he said the same thing in 2012 that he said this week.
No "comprehensive" Immigration Law, but break it into pieces is fine.

It's clear to anyone with Reading Ability that the Congress & Citizens can't trust Obama. Not on Immigration and not on National Security.

His latest (possible) illegal action is to circumvent not only Congress and the Laws on the books - but a Court Order in a Federal Court ...... according to a Homeland Security Memo on the "Obama Amnesty".

Leaked DHS memo shows Obama might circumvent DAPA injunction |The Hill 11/2/15

The internal memo reveals four options of varying expansiveness, with option 1 providing EADs to “all individuals living in the United States”, including illegal aliens, visa-overstayers, and H-1B guest-workers, while option 4 provides EADs only to those on certain unexpired non-immigrant visas. Giving EADs to any of the covered individuals, however, is in direct violation of Congress’s Immigration & Nationality Act and works to dramatically subvert our carefully wrought visa system.

By claiming absolute authority to grant work authorization to any alien, regardless of status, DHS is in effect claiming it can unilaterally de-couple the 1986 IRCA work authorization statutes from the main body of U.S. visa law. While DHS must still observe the statutory requirements for issuing visas, the emerging doctrine concedes, the administration now claims unprecedented discretionary power to permit anyone inside our borders to work.


TeamObama members and DHS all LIED to Judge Hanen, they have ignored his Injunctions and continued to issue work permits outside of the law ..... this is not based on an "Executive Order" - there was no "Executive Order", it was an Executive Memo to Homeland Security.

It the strange world of Democrats - Memos now circumvent all Federal Laws and Federal Court orders are nothing more than Toilet Paper. Paul Ryan is exactly correct - the last thing this Nation needs is ANY "comprehensive Law" on anything at all. These massive Comprehensive Laws leave too much to departments and unelected bureaucrats to write "Rules" used to implement Congressional Laws.

All the evidence of Corruption within the Obama Administration (particularly in the DOJ) means the best we can "hope" for is to hang on until they are all gone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2015, 07:55 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,537,022 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
The reason:

Immigration reform not happening under President Obama, Speaker Ryan says | Fox News Latino

If Ryan is bothered by Obama "going around congress," wouldn't the fix be for congress to pass whatever reform they wanted.

IMO, this is nothing but a poorly veiled excuse for Ryan appealing to the hard conservatives without facing his own views as listed here: Paul Ryan on Immigration

Ryan is just another pandering political wimp who scapegoats.

He's too busy getting that old 'smoke' smell out of the carpet in his new office.

Priorities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top