Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-04-2017, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,713,235 times
Reputation: 14818

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
That's funny - they talked about it at length this morning on both New Day and the show that comes on before it.....


They're doing a lousy job of "not covering it".
My local news channel covered it this morning too.

As per the report, there was absolutely NOTHING illegal about any unmasking, if indeed she did request this information.
Her job title gave her clearance to see whatever had been collected.

Reading through this thread, no one has been able to prove that any of this alleged unmasking was done for political reasons.
There was no public announcement during the campaign.
There was no talk of prosecutions being started during the campaign.
So, where was the benefit?

Just the usual wishful thinking from 45's supporters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-04-2017, 08:35 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,894,256 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Obviously more than you think.
Who's this ladies BOSS?
So Susan Rice wiretapped Trump Tower?????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2017, 08:36 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,956,603 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
No, wrong. NONE of this vindicates Trump's claims that Obama was "wiretapping" Trump Tower.


None. Of. It.
I had this discussion with a Trumpcultist yesterday. Apparently, interpreting what Trump Tweeted (see below) can't be taken "literally." So, even though Obama wasn't involved; and, Trump's phone wasn't tapped; and it was after the election, not during the election process, it vindicates Trump. To this group, words mean whatever they want them to mean.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2017, 08:36 AM
 
51,655 posts, read 25,843,388 times
Reputation: 37895
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
My local news channel covered it this morning too.

As per the report, there was absolutely NOTHING illegal about any unmasking, if indeed she did request this information.
Her job title gave her clearance to see whatever had been collected.

Reading through this thread, no one has been able to prove that any of this alleged unmasking was done for political reasons.
There was no public announcement during the campaign.
There was no talk of prosecutions being started during the campaign.
So, where was the benefit?

Just the usual wishful thinking from 45's supporters.
Rice was doing her job.

Congress needs to do theirs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2017, 08:39 AM
 
51,655 posts, read 25,843,388 times
Reputation: 37895
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
I had this discussion with a Trumpcultist yesterday. Apparently, interpreting what Trump Tweeted (see below) can't be taken "literally." So, even though Obama wasn't involved; and, Trump's phone wasn't tapped; and it was after the election, not during the election process, it vindicates Trump. To this group, words mean whatever they want them to mean.
You got it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2017, 08:42 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,894,256 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
I had this discussion with a Trumpcultist yesterday. Apparently, interpreting what Trump Tweeted (see below) can't be taken "literally." So, even though Obama wasn't involved; and, Trump's phone wasn't tapped; and it was after the election, not during the election process, it vindicates Trump. To this group, words mean whatever they want them to mean.
Alternative facts, alternative meanings, alternative narratives.

It's a circle-jerk validation of an alternate reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2017, 08:49 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,231,797 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzy24 View Post
Which was someone doing their job and perfectly legal.
It doesn't appear at all that way.


Quote:
Trumputin and his conservative lapdogs are just barking to get the heat off of his corrupt tail.
That has nothing to do with my statements.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2017, 08:51 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
As conspiracy theories go, this one about the evil "unmasking" is pretty low on the credibility scale.
Tell me about it, but they'll grasp at any straw to distract from the Russia ties.

I think Trump is going to hit back by unmasking Obama's name, and maybe even Hillary's name.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2017, 08:51 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,654,236 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post

Reading through this thread, no one has been able to prove that any of this alleged unmasking was done for political reasons.

Her logs show, it was not incidental, as she claimed March 22. The search was targeted at everything TRUMP. Not targeting Russians, not targeting Turks, not targeting Syrians... Targeting Americans and only those involved in a political campaign. Her logs nail her. Now the question. Why would she take it upon herself to do such a thing and leak it all to her husband, that broke the story? Did her BOSS direct her to do it? He did sign an unconstitutional EO, that violates individuals 4th amendment, by distributing classified intel, right before leaving office for this very reason?


You all forget so quickly to make your point. The stuff she distributed to her husband(who broke the story), was Classified material.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2017, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
No, wrong. NONE of this vindicates Trump's claims that Obama was "wiretapping" Trump Tower. None. Of. It.
The deflector in chief doesn't need proof as long as there is something else to tweet about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top