Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Her logs show, it was not incidental, as she claimed March 22. The search was targeted at everything TRUMP. Not targeting Russians, not targeting Turks, not targeting Syrians... Targeting Americans and only those involved in a political campaign. Her logs nail her. Now the question. Why would she take it upon herself to do such a thing and leak it all to her husband, that broke the story? Did her BOSS direct her to do it? He did sign an unconstitutional EO, that violates individuals 4th amendment, by distributing classified intel, right before leaving office for this very reason?
Silly allegation.
She was reviewing intel where the names (of Trump and Trump's associates) were redacted. She didn't know the names until AFTER she unmasked them. Even Nunes says the surveillance was incidental. So your entire diatribe is nonsense.
She was reviewing intel where the names (of Trump and Trump's associates) were redacted. She didn't know the names until AFTER she unmasked them. Even Nunes says the surveillance was incidental. So your entire diatribe is nonsense.
Allegation? Or did you mean evidence. The logs are there and it directly list what materials she got.
Obviously more than you think.
Who's this ladies BOSS?
#1 - There is no evidence to support that Trump, or any of his "team" were the targets of any sort of surveillance efforts. Let alone surveillance that was directed by/initiated by President Obama.
#2 - Unmasking identities of US citizens that are incidentally collected because they are communicating with foreign agents is not illegal and reportedly not unusual.
#3 - There is no evidence that Rice was the source of any "leaked" info.
Well Trump said that Obama wiretapped Trump Tower. And the Trump supporters all seem to believe that. And if you're saying that what has come out about Susan Rice, doing her job, validates Trump claims, then somehow someone is saying that Susan Rice was involved with wiretapping Trump Tower. Trump's claim wasn't that he and his associates were caught up incidentally in wiretaps of foreign parties.
She was reviewing intel where the names (of Trump and Trump's associates) were redacted. She didn't know the names until AFTER she unmasked them. Even Nunes says the surveillance was incidental. So your entire diatribe is nonsense.
You would think the purpose of unmasking is to find out what the name is, but the assumption in this witch hunt that she already knew which is why she unmasked them. Logically thinking there would be no need to unmask something which is already known, but logic rarely plays a part in these discussions.
#1 - There is no evidence to support that Trump, or any of his "team" were the targets of any sort of surveillance efforts. Let alone surveillance that was directed by/initiated by President Obama.
#2 - Unmasking identities of US citizens that are incidentally collected because they are communicating with foreign agents is not illegal and reportedly not unusual.
#3 - There is no evidence that Rice was the source of any "leaked" info.
1.) what do you call snooping by Susan Rice? Was she just going for a joy ride looking at old photos to bring back memories?
2.) Just because you have clearance to see the identity of Americans on highly classified intel(dragnet NSA stuff), does not mean you are authorized to distribute it. Only the party or parties that log in eyes see it. It is called spying. espionage in other words.
3.) This ladies husband at ABC, blew the Flynn's name out there in CLASSIFIED intel, for all to see. The Logs show, she is the only one to view the material. What she did with it is anyone's guess. But it is out there. It was for her eyes only. It was targeted to the Trump campaign. Not the Russians, the Turks, the Syrians.... TRUMP. The only thing national security advisor about TRUMP would have been purely political.
Well Trump said that Obama wiretapped Trump Tower. And the Trump supporters all seem to believe that. And if you're saying that what has come out about Susan Rice, doing her job, validates Trump claims, then somehow someone is saying that Susan Rice was involved with wiretapping Trump Tower. Trump's claim wasn't that he and his associates were caught up incidentally in wiretaps of foreign parties.
Allegation? Or did you mean evidence. The logs are there and it directly list what materials she got.
Yes. And, she was authorized to unmask redacted names in intelligence reports. So your allegation is....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
