Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So she can ask for unmasking - and sorry but do I think that Obama and his co-horts did everything by the book and according to law - WE KNOW THEY DIDN"T
Rice married to ABC News producer Ian Officer Cameron. Is there much difference?
The "difference" is that people clearly do not care if they report false information.
If they cannot be bothered to make sure they know the truth about Ms Rice's husband, why should anything else said be believed?
They were sent to all those at the National Security Council, some at the Defense Department, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and then-CIA Director John Brennan and Ben Rhodes.
The names were part of incidental electronic surveillance of candidate and President-elect Trump and people close to him, including family members, for up to a year before he took office.
NOBODY that had their names shared were under any investigation, or had committed any crime. It was a fishing expedition, for political purposes. If this doesn't disgust you, you are either corrupt to the core or a liberal.
..the ONLY reason Trump and his inner circle got caught in incidental collection is because of who they associate with. If you don't pal around with Russian spies, mafia figures, have servers connected to Russian banks, or launder money from overseas, then you don't get caught in the incidental web. There would be nothing to unmask...
Bingo.
The fact that Trump supporters see these revelations as a "good thing" is stunning, honestly.
Never underestimate the stupidity of the American populace, I guess.
They were sent to all those at the National Security Council, some at the Defense Department, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and then-CIA Director John Brennan and Ben Rhodes.
So, they unmasked the names, and sent them to themselves?
Interesting saga.
Maybe they should have used pay-phones to make all those calls to Russia.
The "difference" is that people clearly do not care if they report false information.
If they cannot be bothered to make sure they know the truth about Ms Rice's husband, why should anything else said be believed?
But the implication being married to someone in the liberal media "who is supposed" to inform the public truthfully is correct. In other words how do we know they are reporting the truth. Do you expect her husband to report anything that goes against the administration she works for?
But the implication being married to someone in the liberal media "who is supposed" to inform the public truthfully is correct. In other words how do we know they are reporting the truth. Do you expect her husband to report anything that goes against the administration she works for?
He had quit ABC for 3 years before Rice was appointed as National Security Advisor. Did you miss that bit?
Agree with katzpaw here: Rice did not leak unmasked names. She requested unmasking for her own consumption, which is a part of her job.
And then passed them on. Knowing they would be leaked.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
