Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
#1 - There is no evidence to support that Trump, or any of his "team" were the targets of any sort of surveillance efforts. Let alone surveillance that was directed by/initiated by President Obama.
#2 - Unmasking identities of US citizens that are incidentally collected because they are communicating with foreign agents is not illegal and reportedly not unusual.
#3 - There is no evidence that Rice was the source of any "leaked" info.
It would have been much different if the logs had show she looked at strings of intel from the same "so called" foreign target. But they don't. They show she specifically targeted Americans.
The beauty of this is how far Democrats have shifted the goalposts.
Trump made his accusation. Everyone went crazy, said that never happened and called him a liar.
Now we know Trump was right.
Everyone says well, that's okay because it was legal. And so what,Trump is stupid and so are Republicans.
You can lie, lie, lie, and be caught in the lie. Every time. WSJ, CBS, Bloomberg. Need we go on with you attempting to lie and being found out?
Arrest her? No. Arrest Flynn, Manafort? No. Let the investigation run its course to a natural conclusion. Whoever is guilty will be found out. That is fair and even handed, is it not?
I can live with it. Can you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight
Just arrest her, you don't need any proof other than Infowars. LOL
We also do not yet know the leaker got the information they leaked. Isn't it right and fair to conduct a thorough investigation, leaving no stone unturned. Then whoever is guilty can be adjudicated. I can accept that. Can you?
one thing is that Susan, the video, the video, the video, Rice has been found to have lied before.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge
#1. It's not illegal for the National Security Advisor to unmask information in intelligence reports.
#2. We don't know that anyone got the information.
It would be a violation of an individuals 4th amendment. Americans were targeted here!
Then top that... Classified intel, as Trump had won the election. That becomes espionage.
#1. It's not illegal for the National Security Advisor to unmask information in intelligence reports.
#2. We don't know that anyone got the information.
#1 - it has to be for national security purposes.
#2 - Yes - we need to find out what she did with the info. See the former US attorney's statement below.
----------
Former President Barack Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice ordered U.S. spy agencies to produce “detailed spreadsheets” of legal phone calls involving Donald Trump and his aides when he was running for president, according to former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova.
"What was produced by the intelligence community at the request of Ms. Rice were detailed spreadsheets of intercepted phone calls with unmasked Trump associates in perfectly legal conversations with individuals,” diGenova told The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group Monday.
“The overheard conversations involved no illegal activity by anybody of the Trump associates, or anyone they were speaking with,” diGenova said. “In short, the only apparent illegal activity was the unmasking of the people in the calls.”
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
