Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-03-2017, 10:41 AM
 
10,097 posts, read 10,017,051 times
Reputation: 5225

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by OpinionInOcala View Post
To clarify, I never said that I was fearful of speech. I simply worry more about the behavior of religious zealots than I do folks who use marijuana.
What about zealots for marijuana?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-03-2017, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,667,797 times
Reputation: 7485
Blue states use pot. Red states use opioids like fentanyl and OxyContin.

Which is worse?...............Hmmmmmm...........You be the judge.

Those people who od'd in the car with their children in the back seat were from a red state and would've voted for Trump if they stayed sober long enough.

Tats.........

I was offered a management position at a major property in Kauai, Hawaii, back in the mid 80s. Free car. Free lodging, great pay. They accepted me and said to submit moving estimate costs.
I found out that management does not wear suits in Hawaii. They wear short sleeved, Hawaiian shirts.
I have forearm Tattoos from my Vietnam days.
When they found out they said, "Thanks for applying, but not thanks."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2017, 10:42 AM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,567,335 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by radiolibre99 View Post
Nothing is in it for me, just that people who choose not to get tatted up or pierced up or choose an exhibitionist style tend to ascend higher in the ranks of business, law, academia, etc etc etc, probably because they know that being an exhibitionist like that will hurt your chances. Why? Maybe there are other "pretentious" people like me in the higher ranks that thinks that exhibitionist style looks silly.
Again, why do you care what a total strangers salary is? Why can't you answer such a basic question?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2017, 10:43 AM
 
10,097 posts, read 10,017,051 times
Reputation: 5225
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefragile View Post
Why should I favor anyone over another? Why should I favor someone with no tattoos to someone who has sleeves, or vice versa? This is you picking the fight, no one else.
I am mostly taking about this notion that many liberals have about dispelling this idea that things are XYZ in the average in favor of using the outlier as a way to prove the truth in the average wrong. That if I say that in the average, people with exhibitionist tats, hair, and piercings don't make up the ranks of the higher class in this country that it's an erroneous opinion because they know a guy who has tats and runs a start up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2017, 10:45 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,428,613 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by radiolibre99 View Post
What about zealots for marijuana?

What about religious zealots who also toke up?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2017, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Here and now.
11,904 posts, read 5,592,795 times
Reputation: 12963
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzzSnorlax View Post
Why the heck are you guys having a completely off topic discussion about tattoos and piercings in the first place? This isn't left field it is the bowling alley next door to the park.
Ask the chick who brought it up. NC something, I think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2017, 10:47 AM
 
3,340 posts, read 2,142,463 times
Reputation: 5171
Quote:
Originally Posted by radiolibre99 View Post
What about zealots for marijuana?
What about them? Zealotry is silly in general, but different forms of zealotry produce distinct behavioral consequences -- some notably worse than others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2017, 10:47 AM
 
10,097 posts, read 10,017,051 times
Reputation: 5225
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefragile View Post
Again, why do you care what a total strangers salary is? Why can't you answer such a basic question?
I don't care about salary because like you snidely said, that hipster actress with the sleeve tats and cheshire grin, makes way more money than I do, and probably more than an attorney before making partner. MY point is that in the average the best positions where the smartest people go into, there tend to be less exhibitionists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2017, 10:49 AM
 
10,097 posts, read 10,017,051 times
Reputation: 5225
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
What about religious zealots who also toke up?
Yeah, they're called pot heads. LOL The cult of cannabis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2017, 10:50 AM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,667,797 times
Reputation: 7485
Quote:
Originally Posted by radiolibre99 View Post
I am mostly taking about this notion that many liberals have about dispelling this idea that things are XYZ in the average in favor of using the outlier as a way to prove the truth in the average wrong. That if I say that in the average, people with exhibitionist tats, hair, and piercings don't make up the ranks of the higher class in this country that it's an erroneous opinion because they know a guy who has tats and runs a start up.
But in a backhanded sort of way you do prove a point.
Liberals are inclusive and include a wide diversity of individuals and are accepting of their lifestyle choices.
Conservatives are exclusionary and do all in their power to reject, demonize and ostracize from society all who are different in looks, color, demeanor and lifestyle choices.
Conservatives pass laws that are designed to separate and exclude whole segments of society.
Liberals pass laws that are inclusive and accepting of all segments and lifestyles.

Major difference between the two. One is based on love and acceptance.
The other is based on hate and exclusion.
You are attempting to further the exclusionary process right here in this thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top