Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Kind of like the requirement to buy liability insurance as a condition of driving. They can charge whatever they want and in most states cancel your coverage or refuse to allow you to renew your policy without explanation.
You can choose to not drive. You do have many choices if you do decide to drive.
That noted, I believe that if the government is going to force something, there should be a non profit option.
Most people couldn't seem to hear or understand a word Obama said while POTUS, especially when it came to this subject. For example, how many here have heard Obama speak about how the ACA came out after the legislative process versus what he had in mind when he campaigned to overhaul the system? How many heard him explain why it didn't come out perfectly?
How many even still can't seem to hear that progress doesn't always start with an immaculate conception?
Having been in business most my adult life, involved with the roll out of significant business programs, I surely know better than to think you can get a program as large as Obamacare "out the door" without significant issues that will need to be fixed and improved upon. What you have to do, however, is get the thing "out the door" and then move from there. That's how progress is had!
No progress comes from forever complaining something needs to be done while doing nothing...
Something here does not ring true. Someone who has been involved in "the roll out of significant business programs" (whatever you mean by that) does not write like a high school drop out.
As to your first comments, no part of Obamacare came by way of "the legislative process." That's why Nancy Pelosi had no idea what was in the bill, nor did anyone else. It was entirely created from the Executive Branch and handed to the Legislature, so that it appeared to be "legal" (all legislation must originate in the Legislative Branch). It is unconstitutional and illegal.
Something here does not ring true. Someone who has been involved in "the roll out of significant business programs" (whatever you mean by that) does not write like a high school drop out.
As to your first comments, no part of Obamacare came by way of "the legislative process." That's why Nancy Pelosi had no idea what was in the bill, nor did anyone else. It was entirely created from the Executive Branch and handed to the Legislature, so that it appeared to be "legal" (all legislation must originate in the Legislative Branch). It is unconstitutional and illegal.
Pelosi's comments were in reference to death panel comments and that nonsense. It wasn't not knowing what was in the bill and it went through the normal process.
That's the problem ...they don't want it repealed. And it can't be "fixed." It should be repealed because it was unconstitutional in the first place.
And, by the way, don't link articles from The Atlantic. Not a credible source.
Anything can be fixed if there is a will, something as enourmous and critical as health care should be addressed by both parties. Reapealing health care without a viable replacement lacks basic common sense.
Something here does not ring true. Someone who has been involved in "the roll out of significant business programs" (whatever you mean by that) does not write like a high school drop out.
As to your first comments, no part of Obamacare came by way of "the legislative process." That's why Nancy Pelosi had no idea what was in the bill, nor did anyone else. It was entirely created from the Executive Branch and handed to the Legislature, so that it appeared to be "legal" (all legislation must originate in the Legislative Branch). It is unconstitutional and illegal.
Not ringing true here
Many hearings and legislative input.
SC ruled it legal; therefore constitutional.
That's the problem ...they don't want it repealed. And it can't be "fixed." It should be repealed because it was unconstitutional in the first place.
And, by the way, don't link articles from The Atlantic. Not a credible source.
Unconstitutional?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
