Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You can't sue the manufacturer unless you can show a defect they know about. You can't tax constitutionally protected right to make it harder to exercise.
Its defect is that it is very efficient in killing people.
And yes. make it harder to own a mass killing machine. Which the AR-15 is.
Its defect is that it is very efficient in killing people.
And yes. make it harder to own a mass killing machine. Which the AR-15 is.
It is NO different from any other semi automatic rifle. Instead of demonizing the tool, how about we restrict the criminals, and insane, and make it more difficult to commit acts of violence. A gun, car, truck, knife, bomb, etc can not act on its own.
We already have tons of gun restrictions, and gun control laws. The END GAME of all you anti gun nuts is to further CONTROL the law abiding populace, and make them more dependent on GOVERNMENT.
Not legal, nor Constitutional. If you want to do that you need to AMEND the CONSTITUTION. See how that works out. My state (Commonwealth of PA) also has the equivalent of the Second Amendment in the state Constitution. It reads,
Its defect is that it is very efficient in killing people.
And yes. make it harder to own a mass killing machine. Which the AR-15 is.
Let me clarify this for you so that the cultists can have a rest. The AR-15 is a "hunting rifle". Get your facts straight! After all, ban the AR-15 and someone like Cruz will just bring a box cutter the next time. After all they are JUST as deadly and efficent as an AR-15 "hunting rifle", right???
Let me clarify this for you so that the cultists can have a rest. The AR-15 is a "hunting rifle". Get your facts straight! After all, ban the AR-15 and someone like Crux will just bring a box cutter the next time. After all they are JUST as deadly and efficent as an AR-15 "hunting rifle", right???
The AR-15 is a very popular hunting rifle. It is also a very popular rifle for target shooting, competition, and home defense. I have several rifles more powerful, and potentially dangerous as an AR-15, but they just don't LOOK as scary to all you anti freedom types.
The AR-15 is a very popular hunting rifle. It is also a very popular rifle for target shooting, competition, and home defense. I have several rifles more powerful, and potentially dangerous as an AR-15, but they just don't LOOK as scary to all you anti freedom types.
LMAO. Did not think it would take long to get that clarification. You guys are a hoot.
Just wondering... if a nutbag went into a school with big chainsaw and chopped up a bunch of kids would we be demanding chainsaw control? I don't think we would.
Guns are tools, just like chainsaws are tools. Either has a legitimate use and can be used to cause great harm to others.
So when these things happen. why do we focus so much on the tool but not the operator of the tool?
Just wondering... if a nutbag went into a school with big chainsaw and chopped up a bunch of kids would we be demanding chainsaw control? I don't think we would.
Guns are tools, just like chainsaws are tools. Either has a legitimate use and can be used to cause great harm to others.
So when these things happen. why do we focus so much on the tool but not the operator of the tool?
The amusing part of all this is that you guys ACTUALLY BELIEVE this pretzel logic argument. If it was not so sickeningly sociopathic it would be hilarious.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.