Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-21-2008, 04:59 AM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,820,597 times
Reputation: 3587

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by akm4 View Post
"Gay or regular"?!?!

I'm done with this thread.
You know what I mean- gay or straight, homo or hetro. Don't read anything into it that isn't there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-21-2008, 06:10 AM
 
Location: Nashville
74 posts, read 138,813 times
Reputation: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
What you say is all too true. Low paying jobs started coming into Oklahoma worse than ever after Right to Work was passed in 2001. This was a backward thing to do that came out of the 1940's. No other state has been interested in Right to Work. It was a movement that petered out during the 1960's.

And it's a fact that there is so little serious concern about environmental quality in Oklahoma that not even the Democrats give a damn that Oklahoma Republicans inserted in two places into their state platform that animal waste should NOT be labeled as hazardous. I would think in more civilized states people would really be in an uproar over such an outlandish statement.
Animals have been ****ting since the beginning of time without the need to label their **** 'hazardous'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2008, 06:12 AM
 
Location: Nashville
74 posts, read 138,813 times
Reputation: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luiso View Post
Gays are the last group in America that its fine to discriminate against them it happens all the time they are considered second class citizens dont have same right like marriage as rest of us.
Homos have the exact same rights that all US citizens gave.



Quote:
Some relegious extremist see it as a "badge of honor" to hurt them . "Their" God thinks thats fine.

America should have on the books bias hate crime laws .
That's retarded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2008, 06:55 AM
 
4,050 posts, read 6,153,128 times
Reputation: 1577
Quote:
Originally Posted by BilleeBob View Post
Homos have the exact same rights that all US citizens gave.
This isn't rocket science. Heterosexual people are allowed to marry while homosexual people are not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2008, 11:21 AM
 
Location: um....guess
10,503 posts, read 15,596,159 times
Reputation: 1836
Quote:
Originally Posted by BilleeBob View Post
Homos have the exact same rights that all US citizens gave.





That's retarded.
Calling homosexuals "homos" & also calling something "retarded" shows a lack of intelligence. But then again, your screen name says alot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2008, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Beautiful Lakes & Mountains of East TN
3,454 posts, read 7,424,143 times
Reputation: 882
Okay, is "homo" not an abbreviation for "homosexual"? But, that's derogatory right?

How many times do people call heterosexual people "hetero" or "hetero's"? But that's perfectly okay, right?
_________________________________

And as for the marriage issue, once again, the primary entry from Merriam-Webster.com:

Main Entry: mar·riage
Pronunciation: \ˈmer-ij, ˈma-rij\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English mariage, from Anglo-French, from marier to marry
Date: 14th century

1 a (1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law...

Marriage takes place between a man and a woman; hence, there is no "right" of same-sex people to "marry". Not because they're homosexual, but because of the above-referenced definition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2008, 12:06 PM
 
Location: CITY OF ANGELS AND CONSTANT DANGER
5,408 posts, read 12,687,024 times
Reputation: 2270
so you will limit people rights based on a dictionary? another book that is made up. wasnt bling bling added to the dictionary not too long ago? thats pretty funny.

why do you want to limit your fellow citizens rights?

ok so dont call it marriage, let the church keep that. but in this civil society, two loving consenting adults in a romantic relationship who are willing to commit to eachother for the rest of their lives should be allowed to.

i dont think a book, be it a bilbe or a dictionary should impede that or infect peoples ideas on equality.

but i thought this was about proteting those targeted by lowlifes?

Last edited by the one; 07-21-2008 at 12:28 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2008, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Austin
4,105 posts, read 8,306,284 times
Reputation: 2134
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbkaren View Post
Okay, is "homo" not an abbreviation for "homosexual"? But, that's derogatory right?

How many times do people call heterosexual people "hetero" or "hetero's"? But that's perfectly okay, right?
_________________________________

And as for the marriage issue, once again, the primary entry from Merriam-Webster.com:

Main Entry: mar·riage
Pronunciation: \ˈmer-ij, ˈma-rij\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English mariage, from Anglo-French, from marier to marry
Date: 14th century

1 a (1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law...

Marriage takes place between a man and a woman; hence, there is no "right" of same-sex people to "marry". Not because they're homosexual, but because of the above-referenced definition.

You need to get a clue. There is a certain word that is an "abbreviation" of negro. "Homo" has been used as a slur often enough to qualify it as such.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2008, 12:47 PM
 
3,964 posts, read 10,652,962 times
Reputation: 3294
Voter used to be defined as a land-owning male. Bet you have no problem with that definition having changed......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2008, 01:32 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Lakes & Mountains of East TN
3,454 posts, read 7,424,143 times
Reputation: 882
I don't have a problem with civil unions; they're just not marriages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top