Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcsldcd From the way the left wingers are defending the Democrat organization ACORN, it appears they have no problem with child prostitution and slavery.
There are bad apples in every basket, do you throw out the whole basket?
Depends on how rotten the apples are. It seems like the majority of Democtrats and Republicans in congress answered your ridiculous question with a resounding "YES".
Name one other publically funded organization in America where you can walk into four offices and get help on how to start a prostitution ring for underaged girls ("link please"). If you think they are so great, invite them to your own country of Canada and pay for their services with your own money--we're cleaning house and they're looking for jobs. It's a win-win deal for EVERYONE!!
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time."
I thnik it can make him a lame duck for his remaining years if it gets stuck to him.If it sticks hard he could be gone;who know considering the reputation of Chicago politcs.
Well, what happened to their "seat at the table" that Obama promised?
Oh, yeah, I forgot, just like he didn't happen to be in church when Wright was ranting, he probably didn't know what ACORN was all about.
I read the article. Obama himself didn't comment but one of his "trusted" people did.
This is 3 now..Wright, Van Jones and Acorn. Once the "stink" hits the press he walks away..no comment, no defense. He sends his people to make the public comments.
I don't really know what you expect. He's a politician, you bang him on his associations so he dumps the associations so the administration can focus on real issues.
That's the problem when you use Washington corruption as part of your campaign.
I don't really know what you expect. He's a politician, you bang him on his associations so he dumps the associations so the administration can focus on real issues.
That's the problem when you use Washington corruption as part of your campaign.
At least Bush spoke himself when his administration's "stink" hit the public.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
