Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-23-2019, 02:58 PM
 
Location: Belton, Tx
3,892 posts, read 2,207,955 times
Reputation: 1783

Advertisements

Don't know if this has already been discussed, if so I apologize. Anyway, at the moment DFW has about a 500,000 lead over Houston as far as metro population is concerned. In the future do you think that gap will get smaller, close completely or widen even more?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-23-2019, 03:44 PM
 
4,775 posts, read 8,845,243 times
Reputation: 3101
Nope. There will likely always be 500-600 thousand gap between the two.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2019, 05:29 PM
 
Location: Houston, Tx
1,507 posts, read 3,413,358 times
Reputation: 1527
Default I dont think so

There are many variables but at the current rate of Dallas adding 20k-30k more people every year it's not likely. Of course the actual urban area is a different story. That number of 20k-30k is counting all of north Texas and part of south Oklahoma. It counts places that are well over 100 miles from Dallas.
The Urban area is a better comparison. In that case they are both very close at around 5.5 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2019, 09:18 PM
 
3,028 posts, read 5,088,095 times
Reputation: 1910
DFW has more open land area to grow. Houston is blocked to the South, the Gulf, and pretty much east, no one really wants to live that far East toward Beaumont. So, SW, W, NW, N, and NE, seem reasonable as the growth pattern. Actually north across to the west, will likely be the greatest growth, by far. IMHO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2019, 02:07 AM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,904 posts, read 6,612,278 times
Reputation: 6425
It might but not by trajectory. Houston has the possibility of absorbing College Station and the Golden Triangle which would put it over. But that wouldn’t be until a few more census.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2019, 08:56 AM
 
Location: Katy,Texas
6,476 posts, read 4,079,302 times
Reputation: 4522
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParaguaneroSwag View Post
It might but not by trajectory. Houston has the possibility of absorbing College Station and the Golden Triangle which would put it over. But that wouldn’t be until a few more census.
I can see College Station eventually just with many of the high income individuals coming from College Station and the possibility of a rail stop within a short commute as well as the completion of the 290 expansion will lead to massive growth in Northern Waller County. Beaumont though I could never see at least this century. It’s a declining metropolis in Texas and not far from the Texas Triangle either. Beaumont would have to see the emergence of a completely new industry or Houston getting so expensive but still taking growth that Beaumont becomes a viable option for East Houston commuters. Texas Triangle like the nation is likely to slow in growth rate although it might still be getting a 100,000 a year as a snowball effect takes in, with this decline in growth I seriously doubt Beaumont would be able to take in much of that growth at all and in fact might decline even faster with lower growth rates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2019, 08:59 AM
 
4,775 posts, read 8,845,243 times
Reputation: 3101
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd433 View Post
There are many variables but at the current rate of Dallas adding 20k-30k more people every year it's not likely. Of course the actual urban area is a different story. That number of 20k-30k is counting all of north Texas and part of south Oklahoma. It counts places that are well over 100 miles from Dallas.
The Urban area is a better comparison. In that case they are both very close at around 5.5 million.
Durant Oklahoma is only counted in DFW CSA from what I researched.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2019, 04:22 PM
 
Location: Houston, Tx
1,507 posts, read 3,413,358 times
Reputation: 1527
True, with those distances Houston could add both College Station (280,000) and Beaumont (410,000) if you did that Houston metro would have the same population at about 8 000,000 and be growing just as fast. Heck from. Dallas to Caddo Oklahoma is 117 miles.even Waco is closer to Dallas. Yhat would add 270,000 people. Beaumont is 85 miles from houston and college station 90 miles. Austin is only 150 miles from Houston or if you in Katy its only 135 miles.


Quote:
Originally Posted by kdogg817 View Post
Durant Oklahoma is only counted in DFW CSA from what I researched.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2019, 04:37 PM
 
Location: United States
1,168 posts, read 778,839 times
Reputation: 1854
I think Houston needs an entirely new industry to really change the game. Otherwise I'm not seeing how Dfw won't always have the advantage.

Of course both places need to grow up rather than out. I truly hope College Station and Beaumont never become part of the Houston metro area
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2019, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
8,354 posts, read 5,514,165 times
Reputation: 12304
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frustratedintelligence View Post
Of course both places need to grow up rather than out. I truly hope College Station and Beaumont never become part of the Houston metro area
Im with you there. Thats why I prefer urban area as a measurement as opposed to MSA/CSA. I think its more reflective of the area.

But to the question, no. DFW is a much bigger magnet for domestic migrants and its economy is more diverse. I think the combo of those two will have bigger growth prospects.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top