Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which cities' fabric is the most urban?
LA 66 52.38%
NOLA 36 28.57%
Miami 24 19.05%
Voters: 126. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-30-2012, 01:28 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,087 posts, read 34,686,093 times
Reputation: 15078

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
I've been to all 3, LA about 5-6 times, Miami 5-6 times, New Orleans around a dozen. I'd go with N.O. as the winner here, and you could quantify it if you used the "correct" stats, which aren't population but street width, one lane roads, setback, walking friendly zones, bike friendly zones, and percent of that area which is connected. Adding bits and pieces of LA and Miami to statistically form a core of N.O. doesn't work, because you are adding pieces. The word fabric suggests that the areas need to be connected and not spread out. Gaps in these walkable zones represent a metaphorical hole in said fabric. If LA can go head to head with New Orleans, you could just measure Santa Monica, I think anybody would be fine with that, but there isn't one cohesive area in LA that can match up with the New Orleans core, and it isn't close.
This is precisely on target. Could not have said it better.

Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
The other argument going on:
LA is definitely has far more walkable areas than Atlanta even if they are disconnected from each other.
That's not really the argument. My point goes to your aforementioned point, which is that small areas of walkability will not function anything like a city that has a connected urban fabric. Especially when that fabric is large. Manhattan's neighborhoods in all of their splendor would provide a far worse experience than San Francisco or Chicago if it had gaping holes in its urban fabric. It wouldn't matter how dense its neighborhoods were.

Last edited by BajanYankee; 11-30-2012 at 02:22 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-30-2012, 01:28 PM
 
1,750 posts, read 3,389,720 times
Reputation: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
Because it only counts if white hipsters/yuppies are using transit.

F F S
There is a huge difference between choice/and no choice riders.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2012, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,087 posts, read 34,686,093 times
Reputation: 15078
Quote:
Originally Posted by prelude91 View Post
There is a huge difference between choice/and no choice riders.
Yup. Captive riders who elevate their economic status stop riding transit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2012, 01:33 PM
 
640 posts, read 1,225,412 times
Reputation: 459
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Maybe is just perception and what people are accustomed to. Growing up I had the most experience with NYC and Philly of which Philly felt small. Then I traveled more later. From that relative perspective NOLA and Charleston felt moreso on the same scale to me, with NOLA a little bigger. To me the biggest difference as a visitor is really an attached CBD making NOLA feel a little larger in the core. The garden district to me never felt urban and I will be hones that I didnt venture too far from those areas in NOLA so maybe just where I experienced felt similar

A question on Transit - what is the ridership like for NOLA. The street cars seem more quaint than functional (sort of like the cable cars in SF in that regard) but never used buses (actually only ever used the St Charles I believe line and never even the Desire line)
Well, most of the city is laid out similar to the garden district (although obviously smaller and denser houses) along retail corridors with corner groceries, restaurants, and such sprinkled throughout neighborhoods. Uptown is more of a green part of the city lots of trees and such. Downtown (everything downriver from canal street) exhibits more of a hard urban edge with mostly buildings and concrete. It definitely doesn't feel as big as Philadelphia but it is MUCH more vibrant and large than Charleston. I do think New Orleans can feel small and limited if you limit yourself to the FQ/CBD, however there are many more neighborhoods in New Orleans.

As for transit, the streetcars are actually the most used transit lines in the city. St. Charles has a lot of tourists but the Canal line is mostly locals who take it to work and shop (desire line hasnt existed since like 60s). But, there are plently of locals who use the streetcars for daily transit, they may be kind of slow but they work. Also, they are very frequent, coming every 4-5 minutes depending on the line/time of day. The buses dont come as often as they did before Katrina (most every 7 minutes, now most every 15-25). But they are generally standing room only and usually full to capacity at peak hours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2012, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Earth
2,549 posts, read 3,978,305 times
Reputation: 1218
Here's an area in Santa Monica I found to be pretty pedestrian friendly. The 3rd Street Pomenade must be some sort of pedestrian mall like what you see in places like Denver's 16th Street or Minneapolis. 4th street looks walkable. The beach near by is a plus since it isn't far to walk from there. This area reminds me of some of the areas in Miami Beach or Coconut Grove. I've not been to this part of the LA area so this changes my mind as not all areas are loaded with just wide streets along with tons of parking lots and stripmalls. I need to visit this area when I return to LA.

3rd Street
Los Angeles, CA - Google Maps
4th Street
Los Angeles, CA - Google Maps
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2012, 01:40 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,895,654 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanologist View Post
Here's an area in Santa Monica I found to be pretty pedestrian friendly. The 3rd Street Pomenade must be some sort of pedestrian mall like what you see in places like Denver's 16th Street or Minneapolis. 4th street looks walkable. The beach near by is a plus since it isn't far to walk from there. This area reminds me of some of the areas in Miami Beach or Coconut Grove. I've not been to this part of the LA area so this changes my mind as not all areas are loaded with just wide streets along with tons of parking lots and stripmalls. I need to visit this area when I return to LA.

3rd Street
Los Angeles, CA - Google Maps
4th Street
Los Angeles, CA - Google Maps
Santa Monica is a great area (think technically not actually part of LA) but has a nice walkable area and feels sort of hybrid of town/resort. The 3rd street promenade is a great example of basically a mall turned inside out and fosters better mixed use IMHO (especially restaurants and nightlife). Yet SM never feels big city but definitely walkable.

Get there early when you go, the farmers market lives up to the hype


a pretty cool even if kitchy amusement pier to boot
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2012, 01:42 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,980 posts, read 32,634,523 times
Reputation: 13630
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
though and this probably depends on the intensity required (which is probably different and ranging) LA even with disperate enclaves probably would have the single largest singular place fabric.

I love NOLA, a real charm for US cities but to me outside of the relatively small quarter and maybe half of the CBD it doesnt maintain fabric intensity (North of the CBD it loses it and into the garden district as charming as the area is it doesnt either) NOLA to me feels far closer to the size of urban fabric of a Charleston SC than it does LA. And Miami, well to me just somehow loses connectivity to the pedestrian everywhere (as does much of LA to me as its feels fragmented but still in its biggest fragment seems the largest) LA OTOH to me say from Hollywood to DTLA does moreso.
It doesn't maintain the "intensity" of the FQ or CBD but still has a better urban fabric with narrow streets and homes where the front of the house comes straight up to the sidewalk. The pedestrian and human scale is still there despite it's lower density/intensity nature.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2012, 01:46 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,410,810 times
Reputation: 6288
Can you get to the same place, and beyond, looking completely different? In L.A.'s case, you can, quite easily.

Here is a walkscore comparison between Boston and Los Angeles. To make it fair to Boston, I'm only counting areas within Central L.A. (58 sq miles) as defined by the Los Angeles Times:
Central L.A. - Mapping L.A. - Los Angeles Times.

Otherwise, Los Angeles would crush Boston in total numbers. Keep in mind that Boston is generally regarded as one of the most urban cities in America and finished 3rd among U.S. cities in walkability:


Residents Above 90

Boston: 128,406
Los Angeles: 138,692

Above 80

Boston: 249,353
Los Angeles: 560,958

Above 70

Boston: 484,306
Los Angeles: 749,391


L.A. = Atlanta? Sure thing, buddy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2012, 01:54 PM
 
640 posts, read 1,225,412 times
Reputation: 459
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
It doesn't maintain the "intensity" of the FQ or CBD but still has a better urban fabric with narrow streets and homes where the front of the house comes straight up to the sidewalk. The pedestrian and human scale is still there despite it's lower density/intensity nature.
In fact, several people like past mayors and stuff have said that "New Orleans is a world-class city built on the human scale"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2012, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Earth
2,549 posts, read 3,978,305 times
Reputation: 1218
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Santa Monica is a great area (think technically not actually part of LA) but has a nice walkable area and feels sort of hybrid of town/resort. The 3rd street promenade is a great example of basically a mall turned inside out and fosters better mixed use IMHO (especially restaurants and nightlife). Yet SM never feels big city but definitely walkable.

Get there early when you go, the farmers market lives up to the hype


a pretty cool even if kitchy amusement pier to boot
I've always wanted to walk the Santa Monica Pier after seeing it in so many movies and on TV.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top