Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-27-2016, 12:10 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,515 posts, read 33,531,365 times
Reputation: 12152

Advertisements

^^ The DC area has grown by nearly 500 thousand so far this decade.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-27-2016, 02:20 AM
 
2,770 posts, read 2,603,217 times
Reputation: 3048
There seems to be 7 distinct tiers (population wise) within the top 10.

Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), 2015:
(Tier 1) 001. New York, NY-NJ-PA MSA: 20,182,305
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
(Tier 2) 002. Los Angeles, CA MSA: 13,340,068
^
^
^
^
(Tier 3) 003. Chicago, IL-IN-WI MSA: 9,551,031
^
^
^
(Tier 4) 004. Dallas/Fort Worth, TX MSA: 7,102,796
^
005. Houston, TX MSA: 6,656,947
^
(Tier 5) 006. Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV MSA: 6,097,684
007. Philadelphia, PA-NJ-DE-MD MSA: 6,069,875
008. Miami/Fort Lauderdale, FL MSA: 6,012,331
^
(Tier 6) 009. Atlanta, GA MSA: 5,710,795
^
^
(Tier 7) 010. Boston, MA-NH MSA: 4,774,321

Last edited by jdaelectro; 03-27-2016 at 02:29 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 05:18 AM
 
4,344 posts, read 2,805,346 times
Reputation: 5273
Didn't realize DFW was almost 2.5 M more people than the Boston MSA.

Also, you have Atlanta two tiers below DFW yet people keep saying that Atlanta is the most important city in the south. I think people keep confusing the south with the SE. Atlanta is still the king of the South East, but the South is a huge .

This is a public use image from wiki commons, permission given by the author, Stephen F to be used by anyone .



In that Image DFW HAS a centralized position and anchors 7.1M people.

The North east has a clear King, the Midwest has a clear king, the West has a clear king, Atlanta is the clear king of the SE, but had to say which is the clear king in the South. DFW by far is the biggest and along with Houston has by far the biggest economy, but still kind of hard to say it is more important than Miami and Atlanta.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 08:13 AM
 
Location: MPLS/CHI
574 posts, read 689,134 times
Reputation: 427
Is there a way to compare the amount of jobs added to the amount of people added to each area?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 09:20 AM
 
Location: Michigan
4,647 posts, read 8,598,154 times
Reputation: 3776
Quote:
Originally Posted by walker1962 View Post

Then Detroit is somewhat questionable when the core of the CSA has rotted out, dropping 1 MILLION people in the City since 1960 or 60% AND because so much of the auto industry has left for the Sunbelt. Detroit metro is really closer to 4 million CSA and 3 million MSA.


The suburbs grew by 2.6 million in the same time frame. With the city's current population that's still a just under 4 million. Not only that, but Detrot's MSA includes 3 mostly rural counties that adds another 300,000 residents.

Also most of the car companies that are operating in the Southern US are foreign automakers who had little to no presence anywhere in Michigan at anytime. If anything, most of the Big 3 located in Detroit have often moved their operations to Mexico. Besides which, there's still an economy in Metro Detroit outside of the auto industry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 11:35 AM
 
Location: Windsor Ontario/Colchester Ontario
1,803 posts, read 2,226,750 times
Reputation: 2304
Quote:
Originally Posted by walker1962 View Post

Then Detroit is somewhat questionable when the core of the CSA has rotted out, dropping 1 MILLION people in the City since 1960 or 60% AND because so much of the auto industry has left for the Sunbelt. Detroit metro is really closer to 4 million CSA and 3 million MSA.
What? Your thinking is very simplistic. You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. Are you just pulling numbs out of the air and trying to pass them off as something you actually have knowledge of?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 11:47 AM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,560,868 times
Reputation: 5785
Quote:
Originally Posted by walker1962 View Post
Crowded, expensive, worse traffic, and politicians. You can do that comparison for many cities WEST of the Mississippi. Natural barriers to sprawl are fewer, so no need to pile everyone into a denser area. Overall, the Mid-Atlantic/NE corridor has seen a 50 year loss of residents to places like Houston. That is not likely to change with more immigration to the Sun Belt coming from the Pacific Rim and Latin America
You do realize the DC area has the 5th largest numerical population growth in the nation this decade don't you? And has pretty much followed suit the past 45 years. The rest of the NEC hasn't grown like DC. It pretty much has "sunbelt like" growth over that time frame.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 12:47 PM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,133,368 times
Reputation: 6338
Quote:
Originally Posted by atadytic19 View Post
Didn't realize DFW was almost 2.5 M more people than the Boston MSA.

Also, you have Atlanta two tiers below DFW yet people keep saying that Atlanta is the most important city in the south. I think people keep confusing the south with the SE. Atlanta is still the king of the South East, but the South is a huge .

This is a public use image from wiki commons, permission given by the author, Stephen F to be used by anyone .



In that Image DFW HAS a centralized position and anchors 7.1M people.

The North east has a clear King, the Midwest has a clear king, the West has a clear king, Atlanta is the clear king of the SE, but had to say which is the clear king in the South. DFW by far is the biggest and along with Houston has by far the biggest economy, but still kind of hard to say it is more important than Miami and Atlanta.
The thing is Atlanta has no large metros near it so it's sphere of influence is very large. It holds the title over a very distinct area....you can draw a circle with a 600 mile radius around Atlanta and you still don't hit a metro over 4 million though you do begin closing in on both Miami and D.C. That just goes to show you how "un-urbanize" the South is.

Dallas, while 7.1 million is right near Houston who some would argue is the most important city in Texas so they both don't have large spheres of influences.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 03:41 PM
 
4,344 posts, read 2,805,346 times
Reputation: 5273
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
The thing is Atlanta has no large metros near it so it's sphere of influence is very large. It holds the title over a very distinct area....you can draw a circle with a 600 mile radius around Atlanta and you still don't hit a metro over 4 million though you do begin closing in on both Miami and D.C. That just goes to show you how "un-urbanize" the South is.

Dallas, while 7.1 million is right near Houston who some would argue is the most important city in Texas so they both don't have large spheres of influences.
You can say something similar about Denver, but wouldn't call it king of the West. It is king of a subset of the west.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 04:00 PM
 
5,758 posts, read 11,634,135 times
Reputation: 3870
Atlanta is central to its region. Its identity is generally "southern" first and foremost, while the identities of Houston and (especially) DFW are "Texan" before anything else. They are on the fringe of the south, if southern at all.

Denver is arguably Midwestern, as it sits on the Great Plains, which some consider a sub-region of the greater Midwest. But again, wherever it is, it is on the boundary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top